News - Reader comments

Samsung GT-I9500 captures the Browsermark 2.0 top spot

27 February, 2013 | Read the news | Post your comment
Samsung GT-I9500 captures the Browsermark 2.0 top spot - read the full textSamsung GT-I9500 made an appearance in Rightware's Browsermark 2.0 database by recording the most impressive score to date. The device is likely the soon to be unveiled Samsung Galaxy S IV. The result you see above is the best we've encountered in our experience with the Browsermark 2.0...

 

Sort by:

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-02-28 14:21 from nCi3 - click to readShifting back to iPhone admit it man just like Pacquiao gone are the days when IPhone use to rule the world of mobile phone.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-05 06:02
  • t7Xr

I just saw it on AnTuTu. Seems to be running 4.2.1 and had a 1.8 GHZ processor. Looking good.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-03 00:41
  • mHae

These are results based on the experimental 8 core processor that was determined to have issues with overheating and has been changed to the same quadcore processor that's in the LG and HTC that follow it. It's kind of cheating to run the tests this way since its not being released that way.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 18:57
  • 4Kt7

> In reply to Spidey @ 2013-02-28 17:33 from ibcd - click to readGreat quote

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 16:56
  • U$k}

We want
Drop test.......
We want
Drop test.......
We want
Drop test.......
We want
Drop test.......
We want
Drop test.......

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 05:03
  • vV5G

This is not mind blowing benchmark points.
Wait for next....
Nexus5... that time we will know who is the real king...

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 03:57
  • vV5G

Oh c'mon.. This better be the benchmark for the US edition because this is more like the Snapdragon 600 scores :/ All I can hope for is that the Global variant have the exynos octa chipset (: I really wanna see how the big.LITTLE configuration fare in real life usage.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 03:38
  • uBQb

Yawn...................!

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 23:54
  • sXM$

Eh, looks like Krait after all ;-( An A-15 core at 2ghz would be significantly faster.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 19:41
  • 3ZH5

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-02-28 16:37 from m7KR - click to readn why r u here? :D

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 18:44
  • vV5G

Not as good as I expected, but this may or may not be the Exnyos 8 core chip. I've heard it could have the snap dragon 600 in the USA.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 18:11
  • k%Jh

glBenchmark will be the real decider.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 18:04
  • 3x1y

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-02-28 14:21 from nCi3 - click to readso did u count all those people who shifted from S3 to apple, htc n sony?? n more than 50% users got shifted to other brands?? ur facts r wrong... just browse it in the internet n u will come to know who is mastering now...

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 17:36
  • U{ZS

With great power comes great responsibility.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 17:33
  • ibcd

http://browsermark.rightware.c...esults/97018
Samsung Galaxy S4=>2710
ISP: Samsung India Software Operations (IN)

http://browsermark.rightware.c...esults/97017
Samsung Galaxy S3=>2626
ISP: Samsung India Software Operations (IN)

??????????????

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 17:32
  • uGrx

Sry~
U can choose the 1st link in "recent post"...
Or dis is the link~
http://blogs.sonymobile.com/20...-booth-test/

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 17:11
  • sF{3

> In reply to JingXiang Lim @ 2013-02-28 16:52 from sF{3 - click to readplease put valid link and double check after posting

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 17:04
  • t@fH

Any phone dare 2 take the challenge?
Super AMOLED?
Retina display?
Ultra Pixel?
Haha~
All abv will b rubbish compare 2 SONY Xperia Z...=]

http://blogs.sonymobile.com/20...c-booth-test

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 16:52
  • sF{3

> In reply to yo @ 2013-02-28 13:52 from vV5G - click to readBecause of this benchmark? Do you honestly believe that most people care about a benchmark, and do you think that Xperia Z has low performance?? I have a Note 2 and have more than enough performance, performance is not the reason why i already ordered Xperia Z.

Performance is already saturated, for now, there are more important things to consider in a phone this time around. Like build quality and less bloated UI without preinstalled stuff that cannot be disabled without rooting. Samsung really insist that i need all their stupid services running, but why??

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 16:37
  • m7KR

hmm, and I was thinking about buying Xperia Z... well, anyway, Iphone5 is nowhere to be seen

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 16:17
  • UidU
Sort by:

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.