News - Reader comments

Samsung GT-I9500 captures the Browsermark 2.0 top spot

27 February, 2013 | Read the news | Post your comment
Samsung GT-I9500 captures the Browsermark 2.0 top spot - read the full textSamsung GT-I9500 made an appearance in Rightware's Browsermark 2.0 database by recording the most impressive score to date. The device is likely the soon to be unveiled Samsung Galaxy S IV. The result you see above is the best we've encountered in our experience with the Browsermark 2.0...

 

Sort by:

I just got my htc one x put throu this test and its score 2049 so I don't think those numbers above are accurate...in fact in my opinion they have been just made up and have got no technical sense

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 16:03
  • 3J4N

Benchmark just only for references. The most important thing is to get the device and use it and compare. Use the device in real world with the application and feel it and see the different. Don't ever ever follow the benchmark blindly. Thanks.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 15:58
  • KRWu

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-02-28 14:21 from nCi3 - click to readWhere did you get that information from? I would realy like to know...

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 15:13
  • tUaI

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-02-28 14:21 from nCi3 - click to readKeep dreaming

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 15:04
  • 4QSR

I'm waiting..........

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 14:49
  • utYP

> In reply to spity @ 2013-02-28 12:38 from t}g% - click to readBecause browsermark is not much about CPU, but more about optimizing your browser...and now they are sh***** around saying it's the fastest CPU! Well...that still remains to be seen very soon.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 14:40
  • MNSr

Plz Samsung the battery must be >=3000mah. with this specs

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 14:22
  • 9GTU

> In reply to INDROID @ 2013-02-28 07:09 from U{iH - click to readYou mean 40 million Galaxy y and S3 mini and 20 million S3 owner. Get your fact right lot of S3 owners shifting back to iPhone, HTC and Sony.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 14:21
  • nCi3

sony n htc fans will cry more :D

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 13:52
  • vV5G

Damn! More than twice s3!
Where is iph 5 btw?

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 13:51
  • 0ZJS

I have just updated my chrome. After running browsermark on my Xperia V, I got 2193. Maybe it is not a matter of the CPU, but actually the browser?

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 13:43
  • P@E@

> In reply to daysaver @ 2013-02-28 08:19 from t}1q - click to readYeah, but if you look at the rest of the list the Xperia Z, and HTC One fall behind the Optimus G. So atleast you can see the s4 marks are indeed impressive.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 13:26
  • RcFM

What abt antutu geekbench, glbench,...why only consider browsermark and say it top....s4 lost antutu to HTC one and LG optimus g pro in recent leaks...

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 12:38
  • t}g%

my Nexus 4 Android 4.2.2 got 2242

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 11:54
  • YHRM

If the device is really the Samsung galaxy s4!?, so really compliments to Samsung!, well done & keep it up!.and because everyone i know (and i know really a lot), they are all waiting just only for the galaxy s4! (Including obviously me!).but Samsung this time must really work harder than ever before!,1 to beat all the excellent competition!,2 for Samsung it self (as a profit), and 3 to give season to the more than 40 or 50 million users of the galaxy s3 to switch to the galaxy s4!!!!!!!!!, and to convince new buyers!, and so to reach the record of 100 million sells!.so for now compliments to Samsung!, and we are all waiting for it, and with great enthusiasm! !!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 11:31
  • gxKq

I'm impressed. These new benchmarks show practically twice the S3 and Note2 power! Good thing is, so much power already with the current Samsung quad cores - when ICS and JB are running pretty well with dual core devices. Owners won't need to upgrade yet.

iFans used to insist anything bigger than 3.5" is too large (3.5" is ideal), justifying why Apple phones and touch kept the same size for many generations. Now Apple came out with 4". iFans looked silly. iFans used to insist 10" is the best tablet size - saying 7-8" is awkward. Eventually Apple came out with iPad mini. Again iFans looked stupid. Why does Apple keep following Samsung? What will they come up with next.... 5-6" phablet? Quad and Octa Core processors? Naaah... that's just crazy - Apple wont' do that. Or will they?

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 11:28
  • wMHH

If the device is really the Samsung galaxy s4!?, so really compliments to Samsung!, well done & keep it up!.and because everyone i know (and i know really a lot), they are all waiting just only for the galaxy s4! (Including obviously me!).but Samsung this time must really work harder than ever before!,1 to beat all the excellent competition!,2 for Samsung it self (as a profit), and 3 to give season to the more than 40 or 50 million users of the galaxy s3 to switch to the galaxy s4!!!!!!!!!, and to convince new buyers!, and so to reach the record of 100 million sells!.so for now compliments to Samsung!, and we are all waiting for it, and with great enthusiasm! !!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 11:26
  • gxKq

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-02-28 10:49 from 2mCd - click to readIs the score for the sIII up to date? Cause my GT-I9305N Android 4.1.1 got a score of 2061.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 11:11
  • d%17

> In reply to Last Knight @ 2013-02-28 10:36 from 3Trb - click to readthen you are stucked at current speed technology while
other people moving forwrd with better CPU/GPU power.

WHen the new hardware chipset come....there is always
new software will demand for it.

Do you still think 2010 galaxy S can run all new
2012 HD games?Come on man.......

That is why "BENCMARK IS VERY IMPORTANT",
Smart consumer will analyze benchmark data not just
throw money buy phone base on ADVERTISEMENT or hupe GIMMICK.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 10:49
  • 2mCd

Only sammy blind fan will thought:"BENCHMARK is not nothing"

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 10:38
  • 2mCd

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.