News - Reader comments

Judge from Samsung vs. Apple case is on Samsung's legal team

28 February, 2013 | Read the news | Post your comment
Judge from Samsung vs. Apple case is on Samsung's legal team - read the full textNot so long ago a UK judge ordered Apple to post on its website that Samsung didn’t copy the iPad, but then he wasn’t pleased with Apple’s execution of his order and made the company do it again, properly. Remember? Guess who that judge is working for now. Put your tin foil hats on and read on....

 

Sort by:

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-03-01 23:51 from 4Er} - click to readNo prob. I accidentally misread things. We all do.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 23:55
  • 4QSR

> In reply to [deleted post]ohh I now see that u had replied to a deleted post. In that case, i agree. my bad

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 23:51
  • 4Er}

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-03-01 07:58 from Iw6U - click to readTheir scenario was not exact, but it was close...You just however created a false setup that is very false while claiming theirs was false...Good job

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 23:40
  • 4QSR

> In reply to XXX @ 2013-03-01 05:22 from LK3S - click to readIf it's a computer or has chips in any way shape or form then yes. As every thing in this entire existence is flawed.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 23:38
  • 4QSR

> In reply to [deleted post]Umm no. Samsung was not the first to do everything, and I don't believe that they falsely claim to have done so like Apple does... yeah, some things were first...features galore on Samsung phones. People buy Samsung because right now, they are the best out there. Apple was the best in 2007, thanks to improving (not innovating). But now there is much competition, which has improved yet again. Your "sheep" buy Apple products; inferior, over-priced phones.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 19:33
  • 4Er}

Mueller is NOT a legal expert. He is payd by the "ennemies" of Goggle for the blogging he do.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 08:23
  • 9xds

> In reply to A Nony Mouse @ 2013-03-01 07:22 from NHTh - click to readHuh? How is that example even remotely the same? That laborer had no power or control over anything. This would be more like if the contractor promised to hire the clerk at city hall if he would grant him the permits he needed to go ahead on a project. You really don't see a conflict of interest here?

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 07:58
  • Iw6U

Its a common problem with the Americans.
Whenever someone or something going to get bigger than them. They start panicking.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 07:25
  • t@JS

Lol
You guys are pretending that you would do differently?
I hired a builder and one of his labourers was very hard working and an overall nice guy. So after the job was done, I hired the labourer to help out around the house with small stuff.

The principal is somewhat the same.... (insert something about Windows Phone here)

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 07:22
  • NHTh

Instead of focusing on this case, they should focus on the new handsets.. to prove that they have their so-called "innovation". That goes to samsung and apple.

Both of them should stop these non-sense case. While these 2 giants are fighting, the other companies are already making their way to the top.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 06:23
  • vj1N

> In reply to Ken @ 2013-02-28 22:22 from IEIk - click to readApple is the best.....

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 05:52
  • wiR}

The money can buy everything in the planet

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 05:25
  • rAN}

> In reply to Lepra @ 2013-02-28 22:06 from L90V - click to readWindows has a phone? Does it crash and get viruses?

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 05:22
  • LK3S

that's the prove how stupid samsung are.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 03:34
  • UNA6

> In reply to gilbs @ 2013-03-01 02:38 from wMHH - click to readAgreed

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 02:42
  • 4QSR

> In reply to Lepra @ 2013-02-28 22:06 from L90V - click to readAnd guess what... Samsung makes Windows phones.

Btw Microsoft (who owns Windows in case you didn't know) is also participant in stupid patent wars, so this can't be a rational reason for Windows phones.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 02:38
  • wMHH

> In reply to StarStuff @ 2013-02-28 20:56 from R3Df - click to readYes Samsung needing a strong defense because crapple wont stop trying to bully everyone when they are the biggest copy cats and thieves of them all....is Samsung using unethical means....Smart thinking. How can so many of you make so many backwards illogical statements?

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 01:38
  • 4QSR

This is great news! Means Samsung may actually get a fair trial

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 01:29
  • 4QSR

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-03-01 01:17 from j@}2 - click to readThey couldn't even come up with an original commercial for the original galaxy. They had to rip off Halo.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 01:20
  • j@}2

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-03-01 01:17 from j@}2 - click to readOh yeah....Let me tell you how those are such epic copies.....not to mention all phones share in barrow designs or ideas in the small of a depth...but thats a very small depth. And you talk about others not knowing??????????

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 01:20
  • 4QSR
Sort by:

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.