News - Reader comments

Judge from Samsung vs. Apple case is on Samsung's legal team

28 February, 2013 | Read the news | Post your comment
Judge from Samsung vs. Apple case is on Samsung's legal team - read the full textNot so long ago a UK judge ordered Apple to post on its website that Samsung didn’t copy the iPad, but then he wasn’t pleased with Apple’s execution of his order and made the company do it again, properly. Remember? Guess who that judge is working for now. Put your tin foil hats on and read on....

 

Sort by:

> In reply to Communion @ 2013-03-01 01:05 from ITVZ - click to readYou seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of patents. No one is suing anyone because they created a device with the same function as another company. It's the design. Samsung's been doing this for years. They did it to Motorola with the Blade (Razr....Blade, get it?) RIM with the Blackjack (Blackberry...Blackjack). Apple is just the first company to really stand up to them and call them out for their blatant copying.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 01:17
  • j@}2

Apple patented what? Already invented technologies? In fact, Apple inc, is that moronic company who has copied others work. Long before apple launched its first iPhone, companies like Nokia was making smartphone with symbian OS. Apple got an inspiration and started fooling rich customers with its products. And not only this ipad type touchbased devices were already invented long time ago and Microsoft was the first company who introduced its Windows OS on tablet like machine years before apple ''invented'' its ipad. Apple just copied the idea.So, in a nutshell, who is copying? Further more, I do not understand the patent laws of America. If one is powerful like Edison, he gets the fruit out of others hard work.
And on one ground, apple is claiming anything about something being copied? Its own products are using hardware manufactured by others companies especially by Samsung.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 01:05
  • ITVZ

> In reply to Lepra @ 2013-02-28 22:06 from L90V - click to readI don't really follow your logic. How does Samsung hiring someone compel you to buy a Windows Phone?

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 00:43
  • nyFn

> In reply to uu @ 2013-03-01 00:22 from wHrS - click to readSo he landed a plum job as a consultant for Samsung. Revolving door at it's finest.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 00:37
  • j@}2

"Sir Robin Jacob is not a legal representative of Samsung Electronics. A highly reputed intellectual property expert and academic, Sir Robin has been contracted as an expert by a law firm that represents Samsung Electronics in its case against Ericsson."
-samsung

guys stop this hate!

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 00:22
  • wHrS

I don't like Apple, but this doesn't look so good on Samsung... Remember, they do this all the time in their own country. http://www.independent.co.uk/n...8510588.html

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-01 00:11
  • pwYX

The good old revolving door. Looks like Samsung is stepping up their government officials buying spree to the international level.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 23:44
  • j@}2

Well this just makes things even after the biased judgement that the judge gave when they had that case in the Rotten Apples front garden!

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 23:44
  • 39x{

I didn't know you could buy judges lol

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 23:13
  • X3tk

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-02-28 20:18 from xbS{ - click to readDo you mean apple? Cause there really corrupt

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 23:12
  • X3tk

Even if the judge is already retired... it still does leaves a bad taste in the mouth.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 22:29
  • UD%n

> In reply to Lepra @ 2013-02-28 22:06 from L90V - click to readReally THIS is the reason you bought a windows phone? This?

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 22:22
  • IEIk

> In reply to JF @ 2013-02-28 20:39 from YbaI - click to readThat's the reason i bought Windows phone .

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 22:06
  • L90V

> In reply to killer droid @ 2013-02-28 20:41 from QGtq - click to readlol glad I could be of service my good comrade

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 21:24
  • jxxN

> In reply to [deleted post]Really? What part of it do you take offence to?

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 21:14
  • mc6Y

LOL looks like money can buy almost everyone in this planet. What Samsung has done is normal for a company of its size. Same with Apple. Big companies seek all unethical means for the growth of their companies. It's just the fanboys who elevate the makers of their electronic gadgets to a level of god. They assume that just like god those companies have to be perfect and ethical.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 20:56
  • R3Df

Ofcourse didn't!
Why?
Because, ipad is bad, ugly and unusable compare samsungs products!

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 20:52
  • LdQb

> In reply to Ubuntu Takeover @ 2013-02-28 20:30 from jxxN - click to readLol this made my day!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 20:41
  • QGtq

> In reply to [deleted post]Samsung has a much worse history of bribing public officials than any other tech company out there. You tell yourself what makes you feel better, but it's easy to research past precedents on Samsung unethical, borderline illegal and full blown illegal actions in the past. It's just not a topic that most fanboys know about or like to acknowledge.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-28 20:37
  • Iw6U

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.