News - Reader comments

Samsung i7110 pops up - Symbian S60 plus 5 megapixel camera on-board

Samsung i7110 pops up - Symbian S60 plus 5 megapixel camera on-board - read the full textA new Samsung handset appeared online before its official announcement. As it seems, we will be seeing a new Symbian OS-based smartphone with a 5 megapixel camera - the Samsung i7110. Update 20 Oct: The Samsung i7110 is finally released. Check out our scoop and preview along with exclusive live...


Sort by:

I have received a Samsung I7110 in October 2009. The phone is sleek and stylish. Display is excellent. It has onboard GPS and in South Africa it comes with Garmin. It has a Music Player with a FM Transmitter that allows you to listen to your music on any radio. The 5 Mega pixel camera is sharp and does take good photos.

There are one problem with the phone. It's battery life is very bad. The battery only last 1 and a half day and must rather be charged daily, which compared to other phones is not good. According to specifications talk time of up to 11 hrs and standby time of up to 451hrs is accomplished with a 1200 mAh is possible. My experience with the phone makes this a myth. Samsung urgently need to tend to this.

  • Reply
  • 2009-12-12 19:00
  • fweE

on gsmarena and google shows 2 different i7110 phones

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-19 13:54
  • 0Ffw

Its exactly a revamped i550, but with a nicer design. Same kind of side buttons and same slider slot for Samsung charger.

  • Reply
  • 2008-10-09 00:07
  • nncn

have this phone a GPS feature?

  • Reply
  • 2008-08-13 12:35
  • nMv2

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-08-12 21:43 from nTJx - click to readif you want this to end bro..i got an idea....dont come back...
as I've said there are plenty of other phones here with 'poor displays' just waiting for your petty comments..

  • Reply
  • 2008-08-13 05:19
  • PGcX

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-08-12 21:43 from nTJx - click to readrepeating those nonsense? yeah, thats great english right there..

once again... no answer???? Your agruement is getting weaker by the second, you've now resorted to getting personal in your petty remarks..there wasnt even a hint of an answer in that last comment,..Im asking a question mate.. which you cant seem to answer???

  • Reply
  • 2008-08-13 05:16
  • PGcX

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-08-12 19:31 from PGcX - click to readLOL...
Beaten by you.
Who do you think you are, huh?
You just trolling & can't understand anything about that.
& repeating those nonsence.
You even can't speak English properly.
Go learn more how to speak English, & then talk about other things.

  • Reply
  • 2008-08-12 21:43
  • nTJx

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-08-12 18:59 from nTJx - click to readso other factors come into it right? its not just black and white is it? so thank you, you just validated my point. of course its related.. according to 2 expert review sites a 256k color display can be as good if not better than a 16m color screen. and thats not coming from me.
second thing... first quote was taken from so get your facts straight before you go around calling people noob's. lol wtf???
u want me banned because u know i got you beat..
last of all, u can say all that you want about that 'terrible-end' se phone cas according to experts its any good as any 16m color display.
seems like 'poor' might be as bad as that 'terrible-end' cell phone, which.. is looking pretty good going by expert opinions.
i get it bro..u aint got a leg to stand on.
i aint not nothing against you.. just stating the facts.

  • Reply
  • 2008-08-12 19:31
  • PGcX

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-08-12 15:12 from PGcX - click to readWhy you always showing that horrible site:
Listen noob, it's not related to 262K or 16M display color quality.
Just thing a bit, it's all about default setting: brightness, contrast & gamma of 6500S display driver.
Sony Ericsson just tweaked that terrible-end cell phone display driver.
With Nokia tools, you can do that for 6500S.
It's just software tweaking.
Like always, you don't get it.
Admins, please ban him, he is just trolling.

  • Reply
  • 2008-08-12 18:59
  • nTJx

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-08-12 14:34 from nTJx - click to readawwww, that aint nice.. must be getting to you huh?.. wow what a suprise..couldnt answer my

heres another quote for you..
'The 6500 Slide's display is capable of showing up to 16 million different color shades. I don't find it to be quite as bright as many other similar displays though, and easily would have preferred a brighter 65k or 262k color display in its place'.

from :

thats funny.... u seem to think these are purely my opinions???

in the real world...dont give up your day job.
thanks bro.

  • Reply
  • 2008-08-12 15:12
  • PGcX

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-08-12 13:43 from PGcX - click to readYou're just freaking yourself out with that knowledge you have.
You are forcing your thoughts to people with just that blind tests to telling you're right, but you aren't.
Don't you think people may laugh you out loud?
If you dare, post your thoughts for devs in & wait for replys.
You're just a no0b, but talking like a master of devs.

  • Reply
  • 2008-08-12 14:34
  • nTJx

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-08-12 10:56 from nTJx - click to readgive up??? ohh i get it.. its about winning & loosing to you huh? seriously how old are you? way to show your maturity.

  • Reply
  • 2008-08-12 13:43
  • PGcX

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-08-12 10:56 from nTJx - click to readno bro, i dont really know what 262k color means... as i said i aint no u answer my question?? if the difference is so great as you state... how, and i quote can a display quality be 'supreme' or as good as a 16m color display????
wait i will even quote from you...
'Win Mobile has the best rendering method in mobile OSs, but Win Mobile only supports 65K color'.
you competely contradicted yourself.

now, i've got both 256k and 16m color display phones and im telling you now the color quality/ display is better on my 256k mobile.
so answer my question? if the difference is so great as you say, how is this so??

o yeah..your gonna statement.....LOL that was a joke right? they are both incorrect grammer einstein...

  • Reply
  • 2008-08-12 13:38
  • PGcX

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-08-12 07:34 from PGcX - click to readWhere do you live?
The other important thing about color quality is rendering methods.
You even don't know what rendering method Symbian developers uses.
You even don't know about display drivers of Symbian cell phones & also OSE cell phones of Sony Ericsson.
Win Mobile has the best rendering method in mobile OSs, but Win Mobile only supports 65K color, & it's too bad for Microsoft.
Win Mobile 7 will support 16.7M color.
Also, Microsoft copy & paste many features of iPhone OS in Win Mobile 7.
So, what do you want to tell next time?
Why don't you give up?

  • Reply
  • 2008-08-12 10:56
  • nTJx

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-08-12 06:11 from PGcX - click to readHahahaha...
Can't stop laughing.
Gunna? It's gonna, Mr. Dictionary.
You even don't know what's really 262K color, do you?
262k is just 65K effective color.
It's very low quality.
You made my day.

  • Reply
  • 2008-08-12 10:41
  • nTJx

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-08-11 19:39 from n{Qc - click to readok bro.. u tell me this... quotes taken from from the sony-ercisson c702

remember the c702 has a 256k display...
'In many ways thanks to its supreme display, the C702 is very good at displaying images and photos; it even manages to look similar to Nokia’s top-of-the-line solutions on this front'...

how it that possible??? nokia's top of the line solutions?? hmm correct me if i am wrong but nokia's high end phones come with 16m color displays right??? but no,, it cant be!!! say its not so! how is this possible when the difference in color display/quality is so great?????????????go figure?
LOL...guess the experts are color blind too right?...

  • Reply
  • 2008-08-12 07:34
  • PGcX

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-08-11 19:39 from n{Qc - click to readok, im gunna assume english is not your first language so im gunna let that one go... guess i am color blind, along with 99% of the population. the only one around here thats funny is you with your agruements that are as weak as your grammer. oppss..i guess i let that slip after all.
Once again...the websites filled with 'poor quality' off you go, knock youself out... o yeah, that link was about as useful as you being here.

  • Reply
  • 2008-08-12 06:11
  • PGcX

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-08-11 18:36 from PGcX - click to readHahahaha...
You're funny, not me, & speaking eng horrible funny.
Looks like you're color blind.
You can't understand, it's not my problem.
I don't care.
Learn more here, instead of talking so funny like this:

  • Reply
  • 2008-08-11 19:39
  • n{Qc

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-08-11 17:46 from nTJx - click to readcut the crab??lol.. not mate i am right.. pride is a hard thing to swallow huh? your arguement is surmounted to 'im lying'& 'cut the c.rap'??your funny ...Ive seen many(and many will agree) 256k/262k displays that look better than 16m color displays and vice vera.. so u might come in here with your pretty agruements tryin to dis this phone cas u dont like it for what-ever reason..i couldnt care less..but in the real world and i do emphasize the 'REAL WORLD' 99 people out of a hundred would walk into a mobile phone store and would not see any significant difference if any, in comparison to the 2 screens....
So, off you go, you got nothin..i think there are plently of other phones here with 'poor display' here to keep you busy for a while with your petty comments..peace.

  • Reply
  • 2008-08-11 18:36
  • PGcX

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-08-11 06:42 from PGcX - click to readJust cut the crab.
You aren't right.
Give it up: nothing diff between 262,XXX & 16,XXX,XXX color quality.

  • Reply
  • 2008-08-11 17:46
  • nTJx

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.