News - Reader comments

Apple wins patent infringement lawsuit against Samsung in UK

08 March, 2013 | Read the news | Post your comment
Apple wins patent infringement lawsuit against Samsung in UK - read the full textThe Apple vs. Samsung legal kerfuffle continues, with the latest round going in favor of Apple. According to a UK court, Apple was not found guilty of infringing upon three of Samsung's patents. Samsung had claimed in court that Apple was infringing upon three of its patents related to...

 

Sort by:

https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/geohives/id58322­3414?mt=8

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-12 09:57
  • 9xHt

> In reply to mannu4u4u @ 2013-03-11 07:41 from vbxJ - click to readhaaa apple sucks...

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-11 16:45
  • Y}K4

> In reply to Talal @ 2013-03-10 05:49 from ITVd - click to readi am waiting for his reply...hehehe

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-11 12:22
  • 9xB$

Lack of innovation but full of lawsuit.... That's the Apple way;-)

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-11 09:24
  • khM7

If you Love Apple then you must read this buddy
An Attacker can Steal your Passwords while you are using Apple App store
http://www.hackersnewsbulletin...sswords.html

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-11 07:41
  • vbxJ

why this case always took place uk
because that apple only wins in uk
or judge of uk court want some money
u can all see how many times apple try to defect samsung its became strong and strong.
instead of fighting with samsung
apple must try to improve his vision
pls apple wrold is watching u

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-11 06:28
  • vIfM

> In reply to zikrito @ 2013-03-09 09:42 from wHrS - click to readdo u really think samsung is the only semiconductor manufacturer around? there's intel qualcomm tsi amd texas. so many. its not zikrit u know

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-10 19:26
  • 04Vf

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-03-09 02:50 from Kn{Y - click to readthis is the best and the most logical comment so far... one more name before microsoft .. it was hp actually

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-10 11:19
  • vGBb

Apple keeps winning these battles because the way they run things they need a huge percentage of their revenue going to their legal department, But it won't work forever because they have all their eggs in the iPhone basket and a change in public tastes will destroy Apple the same way it happened in the early 90's, But Samsung will survive.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-10 10:33
  • 39x%

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-03-09 16:57 from vjrR - click to readEdison was a ***k. He hired Tesla, got his bulb perfected, took credit out of his work and forced him to leave without paying him a penny. You are taught wrong in books.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-10 05:49
  • ITVd

... and in the end, people will go back to sending letters, and some use tin 'n' string phone as a communication media. some are way too desperate, they start to draw message everywhere possible to communicate, just like the stone age era. It is where we won't sue anything for anymore...

Anyway, both are still the best I think, because I am a fan of both Sammy for the tech and Crapple for its built quality.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-09 21:04
  • PBU3

Because third-party corruption .. Apple can win in this case

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-09 20:43
  • tu2V

> In reply to humprey @ 2013-03-09 13:52 from vfxa - click to readThats true, but when you have people who are too lazy or moronic to do any research on a claim and shout to the top of their lungs something that is far from the truth it leaves you, as a person who has done thorough research, to step to them with proof and facts...not just biased opinions. If they refuse to adhere then leave them to their talk.

After all....empty vessels make the most noise.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-09 19:55
  • 8yUI

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-03-09 16:57 from vjrR - click to readLol. Basically nothing had to fall into place, like i said earlier...xerox had the whole puzzle pieced together. Everything was there to begin with. Jobs didnt get the GUI 'right' he basically took a black&white picture and colored it so to speak, Eddison put pieces of a puzzle together...see the difference? The GUI on the monitor, the keyboard, mouse, the whole shebang was under xerox but the xerox's heads weren't pushing it they never saw the profit in it.

Most would agree they were 10+ years ahead of their time and the researchers and engineers at xerox saw the value of what they built but as usual corporate knuckleheads gave it away cheaply. Now the mainstream public doesn't even know who xerox is...most's best guess would be a prescription drug.

History is a treacherous subject which is only skewed and written by the victors. You have to look at BOTH sides of the coin with scrutiny, see what adds up and let common sense do the rest.

Also, some food for thought for the iboys: If apple blatantly ripped ideas and technologies from other people/companies...what makes samsung any worse? One would have to look really close to see identical similarities between samsung and apple devices(if there is any at all) so technically it cant be called a blatant rip in samsungs case and if it is....then there are at least 7 companies that owe apple good money.


Pot calling the kettle black story. Am I right or wrong?

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-09 19:41
  • 8yUI

> In reply to Kaln0x @ 2013-03-09 12:56 from 8yUI - click to readIts the same man .. with the lightbulb. Many have tried to make the "lightbulb" idea.. but failed.. like the glowing wire.. only edison got the formula correct.

But in the case of jobs, hes the same thing, he got the UI correct, the mouse correct everything falls into place.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-09 16:57
  • vjrR

Apple has been trying to remove Samsung as their supplier but Samsung keeps finding ways to tie them in (eg Samsung upgraded their Texas manufacturing plant). It's Samsung that needs Apple.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-09 16:10
  • rv2c

> In reply to zikrito @ 2013-03-09 09:42 from wHrS - click to readApple will go somewhere else to get their Chips manufactured. May be to Qualcomm. Apple & Samsung both will move on.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-09 16:03
  • nGsP

> In reply to iulik @ 2013-03-09 08:49 from LaBD - click to readThe first mobile phone was from IBM called Simon but the first popular were the iPAQ by COMPAQ...

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-09 14:36
  • nTu5

Apple can never suppress Samsung no matter how long they drag them to any court

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-09 14:30
  • Nw6N

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.