News - Reader comments

Apple wins patent infringement lawsuit against Samsung in UK

08 March, 2013 | Read the news | Post your comment
Apple wins patent infringement lawsuit against Samsung in UK - read the full textThe Apple vs. Samsung legal kerfuffle continues, with the latest round going in favor of Apple. According to a UK court, Apple was not found guilty of infringing upon three of Samsung's patents. Samsung had claimed in court that Apple was infringing upon three of its patents related to...

 

Sort by:

> In reply to SUNNY @ 2013-03-08 10:08 from 98Wj - click to readi cant tel anything ... U ur self agreed tat crapple is useless !!!! Lolz :D

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-08 11:33
  • 7qD@

I want u all to see samsung as a price controller. if u must sell, then u must reduce your price n increase technology becus phones r becoming 2 expensive this days. Most phone r not worth d price they place on them

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-08 11:32
  • HHHH

> In reply to MINIME @ 2013-03-08 10:40 from pj}V - click to readCORRECT! 2 thumbs up for this comment.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-08 11:29
  • vxui

> In reply to SUNNY @ 2013-03-08 10:08 from 98Wj - click to readlolzzz dudee we are not talkin about diamonds or gem stones !!! Lolzz ur completly going outt of the actual discussion !!!! Guess u are out of ua mind??? Do u knw wat r v talkin abt ???? Again once more for ur kind info we are talkin abt phones dude not diamonds or gem stones... Lolzzz ur so funny lmao !!!

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-08 11:26
  • 7qD@

> In reply to samsung rules @ 2013-03-08 10:52 from v0qu - click to readHahaha, i advise you to think harder the next time you make such a comment. If sammy is the maker of such an efficient chip/processor, how come Sammy can't make a phone (with the same chip/processor) of equal or greater efficiency? What say you?

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-08 11:17
  • t7Xi

> In reply to MINIME @ 2013-03-08 10:40 from pj}V - click to readyaa.. & that 1.2 ghz chip manufactured by Samsung

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-08 11:08
  • MfxH

> In reply to MINIME @ 2013-03-08 10:40 from pj}V - click to readIphone 5 came out "after" the s3 and is using newer architecture. Plus there's more to CPUs than core count and clockspeed.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-08 11:06
  • qLvb

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-03-08 10:19 from srdF - click to readI guess I phone doesn't have any features...
Confused! :s

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-08 11:05
  • PUmB

I'm wondering what if Apple and Nokia win the case against Samsung and Google stop selling Android to Samsung!

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-08 10:57
  • 3Y2h

Let's look at both sams and apple, yes apple is asking for too much but its worth it, when samsung was rolling out phone compatible with Bada os, no body copy them becos we all saw as their style of designs only God knows what would become of them may be king or servant like Nokia who married symbian and almost died of nuptials. Apple has so much into technology to be able to design a phone that has its unique factors, they never went for any third party contribution except even hav to meet with samsung for their chipsets and screens, if samsung have a priority opportunity to know what apple make then they took the steps, apple never bothered any one for taking a risk into a market they never new how its runs. In 2007 apple took the risk and design a phone not minding the huge investment ......now samsung saw the success and decide to share from it and become number in a shot while. Samsung have to pay for not dreaming of such and not taking any risk.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-08 10:57
  • 3sE3

> In reply to MINIME @ 2013-03-08 10:40 from pj}V - click to readIts also because iphone5 can't do multitasking so their processors are not frequently stressed

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-08 10:56
  • v0qu

Justice! :)

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-08 10:55
  • IaHc

I wonder who they paid off to get this verdict..

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-08 10:52
  • N9@y

> In reply to MINIME @ 2013-03-08 10:40 from pj}V - click to readWell let me tell you something! that dual core processor you are saying is 100% made by samsung so your crapple doesn't beat samsung s3 so you should thank samsung with that

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-08 10:52
  • v0qu

lol who cares, with the rate of samsung selling phones there wont be any apple soon.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-08 10:48
  • Tu2w

who cares about this..as long as I am happy with my mobile...Id rather go to a company that support thier handset. I mean in a way that they keep it updated. And I guess that's not samsung because they have too many handset to support. But compared to apple,samsung high end devices are a way better than apple. For me apple is for those rich people,people pretending they are rich and people who just think they are cool if they had it. and samsung is for those people who uses their brain. But today samsung is just like apple who are greedy with money. Because their handsets are becoming expensive also. so in my opinion they are both S**T for me!.so open your eyes there are a lot of manufacturers our there who can give your needs for a reasonable price.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-08 10:46
  • K5gv

How can u explain a dual core proc clocked at 1.2GHZ beating a quad core 1.4GHZ proc in benchmarks????
thats what apple did to ur beloved galaxy s3 . That's not catching up, that's humiliation.Now samsung is cooking a 6 or 8 core 1.8 proc to beat iphone 5 and then 5s will come out looking just about the same but with dual core 1.4 prob and still beats up S4.
Cant u people see that it is not apple who is catching up but samsung .
If samsung was using IOS it would be different ....

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-08 10:40
  • pj}V

If anything Apple is it's own worst enemy, they are too scared to break out of their shell of control. They are so used to sticking to the same idea that no innovation is done at all. Samsung is doing what Apple isn't :P

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-08 10:37
  • Nhv8

Why said samsung's copy cat?
A lot of special features is created by samsung, like AMOLED, Note S Pen, etc... samsung make what peoples want, not like apple, pay so much to buy an fast processor phone, fast only nothing more.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-08 10:34
  • Ui%V

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.