News - Reader comments

Neo N003 will be the cheapest handset with 1080p display

09 March, 2013 | Read the news | Post your comment
Neo N003 will be the cheapest handset with 1080p display - read the full textThe Chinese market exclusive Neo N003 will be the most affordable Android smartphone featuring a 5" 1080p display. The handset's retail price will start at only 899 yuan ($145; 112) when it hits the shelves in the near future. The Neo 003 will undercut the previous affordability champion...


Sort by:

yes! this is a very powerful smartphone, very cheap however I think maybe it's just under $200,they'll release neo 003 on August 1st.

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-24 08:56
  • j0c1

I'm from India, when could I buy this phone, looks good.I found a one from , well I'm not sure even if I could buy from there or not.

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-12 10:29
  • w7$x

Is the phone is reliable to usu and what about its build quality

  • Reply
  • 2013-04-15 13:42
  • Kh2i

China goes out on the new level of production of electronics. From last data smartfon will be produced in two variants, and here complete descriptions of both versions of smartfona neo n003

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-15 17:19
  • s3E6

no comment! from algeria

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-14 19:52
  • SsYE

i hope it will realeased in indonesian

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-13 10:59
  • tA$b

> In reply to Neo @ 2013-03-10 12:12 from utBU - click to readDid i say that I'm the CEO of Samsung?So according to you whomever support their favorite brands needs to be the CEO of those brands? So answer to you I'm telling my opinion about Samsung that's all .

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-11 08:05
  • utG3

> In reply to Question @ 2013-03-10 21:14 from Ycn7 - click to readthey care about the plastic cause it's the ONLY one thats left that makes an iphone differ...

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-11 06:58
  • Sa%}

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-03-11 03:44 from PGXj - click to readI think a good high-quality plastic (like synthetic blends) is better than metal, but can also be pretty pricey.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-11 06:12
  • Fv4$

Sigh. What's with people nowadays? Get the main point. this is "Chinese market exclusive" so stop whining and judging around because it won't even reach to your shore. and comparing it to phones which cost few times the price isn't a fair play(or talk about other brands in this post and comparing to one another). what's the point? to prove yourself right? seriously...

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-11 03:56
  • IVWW

> In reply to Question @ 2013-03-10 21:14 from Ycn7 - click to readIMO is because you cannot change the phone's skin.. like you would for a plastic case.

So people will consider build, as it has to be durable for the lifespan of the phone.

Now whether plastic is better then metal or visa versa.. i do not know.. but metal seems more durable.. and show company is putting in effort.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-11 03:44
  • PGXj

> In reply to qaid @ 2013-03-10 14:32 from Sqj} - click to readso what are you expecting in that price as offered by the company? alloy? silver? gold? carbon fiber?? lols! think before you post! its the cheapest quadcore, and still expecting a iphone build quality?? lols! where you came from???

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-11 02:30
  • t7ya

hahaha! your right man, lols!

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-11 02:22
  • t7ya

polycarbonate is plastic.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-11 02:05
  • M7r0

$140 thats crazzzzzzzzzzzzzzy!!!

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-11 00:20
  • T6FK

Why you people care about plastic? I have IPhone 5 and? It's in the plastic case all the time. I most of the iPhones people are using with plastic cases. You care that phone is made from plastic, but keep forgetting that most of the people using plastic cases anyway.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-10 21:14
  • Ycn7

> In reply to SubhasisBishoyi @ 2013-03-10 16:48 from 7txr - click to readIn fact, polycarbonate has nothing of special. The same polycarbonate found on Nokias and HTCs is the same polycarbonate found in Samsung Galaxy S2, S3, note I and II, only the manufacturing process is different.

Apple, NOKIA, Samsung, HTC, SONY and Moto devices are quite similar in building quality and final price, in fact, the screen and SoC are the major costly parts, not the building process. Believe it or not.

That's why an iPhone 5 cost US$ 165.00 to Apple, and yes, Foxconn is still having a good profit margin at that price, so, if the iPhone cost the same or less than other similar gadgets, where is the building quality that many claim?

In the marketing department. Just like Prada clothes vs GAP, the same sh*t w/o the price tag.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-10 17:26
  • Pnc8

> In reply to joonius @ 2013-03-10 11:03 from qbYR - click to readgo and read lumia phones specification and you will fnd out it has polycarbonate plstic body, then go for some reviews of a lumia phone and see how everyone praises lumia for its building quality.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-10 16:48
  • 7txr

Cheap phones can compete in specs like processor cores, screens and batteries. However, quality and reliability are questionable. I have a supposedly reliable China Android phone (ZTE) now under repair in less than a year due to dead spots on the touch screen (can't sense). Still waiting for parts and it's been over a month.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-10 15:45
  • v0qu

Aluminum and plastic have good and bad qualities. Plastic can be cheap but aluminum is also used in soda cans and food wrapper. Plastic in fighter jet canopies and sport car bodies (carbon fiber reinforced polymers) are worth much. Overall plastic is faster to build and shape and color. Aluminum takes hours to machine or cast, and to anodize.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-10 15:40
  • v0qu

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.