News - Reader comments

Samsung Galaxy S4 set to release in the UK on April 26

15 March, 2013 | Read the news | Post your comment
Samsung Galaxy S4 set to release in the UK on April 26 - read the full textThe latest Galaxy flagship from Samsung, the S4, is set to hit a wide range of UK carriers. O2, EE, Orange, T-Mobile, Three, Vodafone and Tesco Mobile will be selling the devices, as well as a bunch of online retailers including Carphone Warehouse and Phones 4U. While none have confirmed the...

 

Sort by:

Another Plastic crap .... samsung its 2013 agree ur futuristic features but bundled in plastic body not fair anyway...

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-15 14:52
  • XuWK

when will it be cuming to SA

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-15 14:51
  • fj9q

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-03-15 13:51 from 2IsP - click to read100 % agree with you

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-15 14:36
  • YhdC

> In reply to Common_636 @ 2013-03-15 14:03 from RcFM - click to readIt would be stupid if they made a phone 1 year later and didn't upgrade the specs. Stop trying to state the bleeding obvious. The thing is the phone is still ugly and too plasticy!
How much different is it from the S3 barring the spec bump? With an upgrade to software the S3 will be able to do most of the gimmicks of the S4

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-15 14:28
  • n5ys

> In reply to Karim-ps @ 2013-03-15 12:22 from rqQG - click to readI and 10 million people, Please buy your preference and keep to that topic.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-15 14:11
  • fjHr

What i find quite strange, is that, the only thing you people can find to say about the s4 is that it looks like the s3, other than design, is basically is superior to all other flagships available right now.

Its a known to everyone by now the s4 design is slightly change from the s3, but everything else are well upgraded.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-15 14:03
  • RcFM



am not a fanboy. i just want the best smartphone. it happened to be s4...

this board's opinion is about s4's launch at uk not any other phone.

you don't like the topic, you can post somewhere else like a typical loser.


  • Reply
  • 2013-03-15 13:51
  • 2IsP

hello,but This samsung galaxy s4, older models look like? too bad.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-15 13:33
  • SnDd

this board is for opinions to let people decide which phone suits them most, not specific to certain die hard fans like you

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-15 13:21
  • rqQG

> In reply to Karim-ps @ 2013-03-15 12:46 from rqQG - click to read

then why not go to xperia z thread and post your comments there and see if anyone is interested...


  • Reply
  • 2013-03-15 13:13
  • 2IsP

Foxconn is responsible for making apple devices which are reviewed as premium devices as well as other major oems

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-15 13:01
  • rqQG

> In reply to Karim-ps @ 2013-03-15 12:46 from rqQG - click to read"unquestionable" based on what a fanboy like yourself opinion?
http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_t...ews-5052.php
Sony build their phones in Foxccon with cheapest build quality ever and wrap them with metal to hide the ugly outdated truth! DON'T you know metal phones increase the frequency of antenna thus increases damage to your nerve cells which is irreversible and precancerous? And some people mentioned they get electrified with metal phones while charging?

Samsung have their own CPU/GPU and their own Display technology and everything even the SIV has Samsung Sensor not that lame Sony sensor in Xperia Z even GSMarena mentioned how outdated Xperia Z camera compared to others! SIII camera is much better check the link i posted from GSMarena compare tools.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-15 12:59
  • fq6D

> In reply to TheMan @ 2013-03-15 12:34 from fqeU - click to readSony quality is unquestionable and everyone admits it, it seems that your fanboyism has gonne beyond the limits
the xperia Z wowed everyone and its the most close to perfect phone as noted by several known tech geek

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-15 12:46
  • rqQG

> In reply to Karim-ps @ 2013-03-15 12:22 from rqQG - click to readSony is the cheap one.
Using all the metals in the world won't cover the ugly inside and will still be cheap as usual or i should call it Foxccon quality?
Xperia Z is so cheap in build quality with the lame viewing angles + its 90's technology TFT and lousy weak speakers, and you can't use customize battery its Non user-replaceable battery.
Check the battery life of that lame Z its only 48h LOL SIII a year older and has better battery life than that LamoZ and better display and better camera and everything.
http://www.gsmarena.com/piccmp...dPhone2=4238
Even if LamoZ is for free i wouldn't touch that cheap quality build.

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-15 12:34
  • fqeU

Come on guys. As much I love my S3. Samsung really should have tried a bit harder with the design. Even if back is plastics a lil aluminium chassis whould have made a big difference. Let's hope the day to day aspects are on point.... as in audio quality and that kind of stuff. .

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-15 12:31
  • 3xym

who the hell wants another cheap plastic toy like the s3

shut up and take my money Sony

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-15 12:22
  • rqQG

That's wonderful news and I am absolutely delighted. :)

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-15 11:41
  • SgvH

hold on i thought that was the S3

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-15 11:32
  • 39x%

haters is another word to people who doesnt have to buy a product but also they cant just stop being jealouse haha

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-15 11:28
  • wHsV

Same old story

  • Reply
  • 2013-03-15 11:24
  • 7XHA

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.