News - Reader comments

Manual for Samsung Galaxy S4 with Snapdragon 800, LTE-A leaks

20 June, 2013 | Read the news | Post your comment
Manual for Samsung Galaxy S4 with Snapdragon 800, LTE-A leaks - read the full textSamsung has officially confirmed that it is working on a Snapdragon 800 based Galaxy S4 variant, carrying the model number SHV-E330S. Today we also got a manual uploaded a bit prematurely to give us more details about what the device will be like. The chipset is obviously new Qualcomm...

 

Sort by:

> In reply to [deleted post]LCD is not sharper than Amoled. That specific Amoled used a pentile matrix. And the difference is not noticeable in 90% of the scenario without close inspection of detail.
Not to mention you completely ignored everything I pointed out about contrast.
Or that fact you just spammed the page because you are a fanatic troll.
And if you use the natural mode IPS is not that much more natural. Just slightly. Until you count that is is showing grey not black and it's white balance is more off. So Amoled is overall more natural. And this is old comparison. Compare the new S4 which is just as detailed without micro scope even though it's still pentile. Or compare RGB WVGA Amoled.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-22 13:29
  • 4QSR

True HD IPS is a lot sharper than the amoled.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-22 12:43
  • t7L@

> In reply to alfu @ 2013-06-20 18:19 from uvqL - click to readNobody here is a paid troll. That's just ridiculous bs.
And acting like Samsung is some evil company and nobody else has used or uses bad or worse tactics is even more ridiculous.

Also there are all trolls on all pages. They all make erratic claims. However the majority if it is trolls from all sides all hating and bashing on Samsung. Which is why most of my comments are defending them lately. Then after so many people bash Samsung someone else comes on talking about Samsung trolls when there is one or none in site....This is going on in almost every page

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-22 04:09
  • 4QSR

> In reply to drkavin @ 2013-06-20 19:42 from sGPq - click to readThere is nothing new here.
You are just making a jealous illogical statement.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-22 04:05
  • 4QSR

> In reply to Nick @ 2013-06-20 22:04 from mG@@ - click to readmaking a big lie and hard core trolling to something you find incorrect makes you the big troll

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-22 04:03
  • 4QSR

> In reply to OSagnostic @ 2013-06-20 23:04 from m56f - click to readLike what? Please tell.
Amoled is saturated or on almost same accuracy level.
Overall less power consuming. Overall more natural in it's accurate mode due to true black, accurate colors, and more accurate white balance.

It's thinner, less reflective, far superior contrast and response time, better angles, black of course, the best of both worlds, better white balance, bendable, more even lighting, less power consuming.

LCD is brighter on average, ever so slightly better white, and less power using whites.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-22 04:02
  • 4QSR

> In reply to L7 -II P713 user @ 2013-06-21 18:11 from v0qJ - click to readNo. Amoled is capable of displaying the darker colors and contrast that LCd is not capable of. Also LCD gert turned upi brighter. You are looking at a lack of contrast at a higher brightness

As for everything else.....You obviously have not been paying attention for a long time
http://blog.gsmarena.com/samsu...rate-colors/

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-22 03:57
  • 4QSR

Cool gadget!!!
I hope it will have Radio inside, not lack of it like the Galaxy S4.
Of course it is a must for this kind of device having the same sensors even more than the Galaxy S4, and a lot of new improved features, as the best camera, best display, best softs and so forts.
I am waiting for this device, and if it will fulfill my expectations I will buy it.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-21 18:40
  • 0Ud9

> In reply to JMartin22 @ 2013-06-21 02:56 from YH{6 - click to readTrue HD IPS produces more accurate and Natural colors of an object.
Super Amoled produces very colourful / sometimes darker colour even it was not the correct colours of an object.

True HD IPS has better and brighter white
Super Amoled has Deep Black

True HD IPS has better neutral balanced of mixed colours
Super Amoled is more likely darker.

Overall True HD IPS is better.



  • Reply
  • 2013-06-21 18:11
  • v0qJ

> In reply to NeverBuySamsungAgain @ 2013-06-20 14:05 from JxHk - click to readHmm... So people who bought the xperia ARC should hate sony for releasing arc S and people who bought the ipad 3 should hate apple for releasing the ipad 4?

Please! I bet this won't even be available outside of Korea. I am buying a new phone on september/october and I wish this updated version will be available in the uk.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-21 13:34
  • i84d

> In reply to OSagnostic @ 2013-06-20 23:04 from m56f - click to readOnly in terms of screen brightness and power efficiency (since most backgrounds use white). Other than that, the 1080p AMOLED display on the S4 has beat all other competitors in terms of color reproduction. HTC One, LG Optimus Pro G and Sony Xperia Z included. The best LCD panel in terms of color reproduction, the iPhone 5, only matches it in that regard.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-21 02:56
  • YH{6

> In reply to joe1431 @ 2013-06-20 21:51 from Ijh{ - click to readIf you wan to play in that way fine .
Sharp make the 1st mobile display . Samsuang copy the rest of it .

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-21 01:25
  • IWd7

> In reply to joe1431 @ 2013-06-20 21:51 from Ijh{ - click to readYou maybe right that OLED is the future, but current LCDs outperform OLED in almost every aspect.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-20 23:04
  • m56f

> In reply to joe1431 @ 2013-06-20 21:51 from Ijh{ - click to readYou are lair, Samsung has Nothing when Sharp has the first LCD screen boy, Samsung are the biggest thief not Sharp.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-20 22:04
  • mG@@

Well, HTC does not make the screen or the lCD.

Secondly, Sharp makes the 1080p display. The layer reducing techonlogy was stolen from Samsung themselves.

Thirdly, OLED displays are way better than LCD. since they do not need a back light. they are also flexible and the future in mobile technology

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-20 21:51
  • Ijh{

amuses me as many of the commenters, discomfort published criticisms that are not at all consistent, which favors us are themselves consumers, businesses lg, samsung, apple, htc, huawei ... among other brands, is a war between them for who will sell more, the inovation the left side, everybody wants to be as imaginative as possible, in order to sell, I like it because I know I will be the beneficiary with technology, but I'm going by samsung which is the best copy :) characteristics of other phones.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-20 19:52
  • L8%1

samsung thought iphone as its only competetor , now seeing htc design, sony waterproof huawei mega screen and nokia eos camera it is verymuch insecure... wants to break into each by launching different products..ina hurry attempt it has failed to see the pricetag of its own device.. what a pity lg is eating into it...
just imagine
s4 with 20mp cam, water and shatter proof build , 3 years warrenty , 2.1 speakers,4200mah battery.. samsung could have sacrificed thinness as a feature and added these..it wod have been master piece and crown for next 3 years... samsung wasted an oppertunity.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-20 19:42
  • sGPq
  • The optimus autobot
  • Report
  • Rating0

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-06-20 18:56 from H5ZH - click to readLmao :"D #classic#

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-20 19:18
  • 3sEj

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-06-20 18:56 from H5ZH - click to readThe name is almost as innovative as the design.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-20 19:02
  • H5ZH

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-06-20 17:32 from H5ZH - click to readIt will be called the Samsung Galaxy S4.5-S2X Extremely-Advanced-Please-Give-Us-More-Money-Edi­tion-S2XAXLS34

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-20 18:56
  • H5ZH

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.