News - Reader comments

First alleged image of the Sony Xperia Honami leaks

27 June, 2013 | Read the news | Post your comment
First alleged image of the Sony Xperia Honami leaks - read the full textSony's event a couple of days ago brought us the Xperia Z Ultra, but still left only one major phone in the rumor mill – the Sony Xperia i1 Homani. This could be the first image of the device – the OmniBalance design gives away its Xperia Z family allegiance, but the camera positioning doesn’t...

 

Sort by:

All sony devices have poor sound quality. No midrange and subwoofers. Look, if u play mp3 files on samsung devices it even vibrates and very excellent sound quality. If u ask me about sony devices? No comment.

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-08 19:22
  • mIgJ

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-07-01 18:01 from fxTx - click to readThat is just your own opinion. Mostly a lonely one in the real world. Only shared in majority by online haters.

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-02 01:00
  • 4QSR

> In reply to Mobilemaster @ 2013-06-27 18:05 from 0UuG - click to readSamsung users I need a little help on this, I have both Xperia Z and the S4 which I just bought a few weeks ago. Even thought there is so must lesser stuffs running on my S4, it just keeps dieing off in the afternoon after a nights full charge but my Xperia Z even on 70% could easily go through a day sigh... Both data connections are on. I went to Samsung but didn't get any advise

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-01 18:11
  • fxTx

> In reply to Alekks @ 2013-06-28 03:49 from mIg} - click to readSign the S4 was long defeated by honami's younger brother the Xperia Z in looks way before it could be born. Samsung has 1 of the worst designs in the world seriously, who the hell puts a freaking humongous optical zoom in a phone... Honestly I even feel uncomfortable putting my Leica in my pocket and it's way smaller than the s4... So much for better design right Samsung haha..

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-01 18:01
  • fxTx

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-06-29 12:25 from 3iJC - click to readYup. All anyone does is complain it's saturated or it's only advantage is black. Then they exaggerate the white issue or claim burn in is wide spread. Then deny it's accuracy level in movie mode which makes it overall way way way way more accurate.
It's all because they are jealous Samsung is doing better. Everyone wants to say they beat the Galaxy.
It's not some conspiracy to upset people though. Samsung is an advance display chip producer. Of course they are gonna make a good phone.

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-01 00:10
  • 4QSR

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-06-29 11:53 from 3iJC - click to readI think Triluminous technology isn't bad coz it already fixed the problem in Sony's viewing angles and the colors are sharper than the Z's! The Z Ultra has great color reproductions and Sony should just change that signature wallpaper that they're using so you guys won't complain about the color being washed out. Try some other photos then you will see the changes. Also, Sony will have the screen better looking with the Honami model since it will only pack a 5" display so it will mean much sharper colors than the Z Ultra's.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-30 09:51
  • th1B

> In reply to Sethy @ 2013-06-29 16:18 from IVIG - click to readListen little boy you have no proof that IPS-LCD has 100% color accuracy. AMOLED is holding that record. Super AMOLED say it with me SUPER AMOLED

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-29 21:42
  • MWWK

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-06-28 14:02 from t78c - click to readi dont care aboutthe battery issue of sony,for as long as the design of their fones is eye catching than any other smart fones in the market today,id stil prefer the sony brand more than samsung,htc,lg,nor apple..and if the battery is the issue then ok,i can still plug my fone to charge.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-29 18:28
  • UD%J

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-06-29 14:33 from 3iJC - click to readIf I'm an Apple fanboy, then you must be sorely mistaken. Ironically, I own no Apples and a Galaxy Note. Let me correct you where you went wrong, kiddo. First and foremost, there is no official award that qualifies IPS-LCD as having 100% color accuracy, but there is a statement saying that iPhone and the iPad both had almost cleared the 100% color accuracy. They ALMOST cleared, but not quite. If you're dumb enough to not understand that, it means that both the devices are 99.99% OR LESS in color accuracy. Secondly, if LG are the ones who make those displays and supply them to Apple, then props to them. Congratz LG in producing a screen that is 99.99% OR LESS accurate colors. Next, Apple copied LG Prada? Wow, the first generation iPhone is announced in Jan year 2007 and later released to the public in the month of June on the very same year itself. LG on the other hand also released its KE850 Prada on Jan 2007. With that said, theoretically, how in the hell can they copy each other if they both are announced on Jan 2007? OK let's brush the fact that they may still be able to somehow copy one another but physically, they both look hella different if you ask me. Last but not least, yeah we're talking bout high-end smart devices, who is talking bout teenage girl's accessories.....? Were you...? Awkward... But anyway, in conclusion, if OLED is superior to whatever garbage I name and that's what YOU think, then IPS-LCD is superior to whatever garbage that YOU name and that's what I think. Your opinion isn't the only one that matters kid. Thanks~ I am posting this again because GSMarena deleted my comment too.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-29 16:18
  • IVIG

> In reply to Sethy @ 2013-06-29 12:35 from IVIJ - click to readAs much as i expected an Apple fanboy. first of all there is no official award that qualifies IPS-LCD as having 100% color accuracy 2nd Apple doesn't make displays. The displays are made and supplied by LG. Apple also copied LG prada,Samsung and android altogether. We are talking about high end phones and displays here and not about teenage girls accessories. OLED is superior to whatever garbage you name. I am posting this again because GSMarena deleted my comment.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-29 14:33
  • 3iJC

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-06-29 12:25 from 3iJC - click to readWhoops for repost.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-29 13:50
  • IVIJ

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-06-29 12:17 from 3iJC - click to readOh you mean this article right here? http://tapthattech.com/2013/06...splay-award/
Hmmm, seems like Samsung is doing well right? Perhaps you did read the title correctly. Correct me if I'm wrong, it also did say, the latest iPad and the iPhone came in close to a 100% accuracy. Side note, IPS LCD still tends to do significantly better than that of AMOLED displays. Conclusion, . If they keep this up, they may be able to show eventually that AMOLED displays can make LCD’s obsolete, but that will be an uphill battle, because LCD’s have kept improving fast each year, too, and they also tend to have a pricing advantage, at the same resolution.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-29 12:35
  • IVIJ

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-06-29 12:25 from 3iJC - click to readWhy don't you ask the question to Samsung fanboys, why they hate Apple? Why do they attack Apple? Why not attack LG? Because Apple have one of the best displays and they are unique in their own ways. Also, they do not need to copy others to make a name for themselves. ;) Pretty good answer, don't you think? Oh and about the edge to edge thing, we'll see bout that.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-29 12:34
  • IVIJ

> In reply to [deleted post]You loathe AMOLED because you hate Samsung. Why don't you boys attack Nokia for using OLED why it's always Samsung ? just admit it you hate Samsung and hate the fact that the best display technology is used in Galaxy phones. Edge to edge era is approaching and all phone companies would have no choice other than switching to OLED.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-29 12:25
  • 3iJC

> In reply to [deleted post]Edit: And also if you don't know the bloody meaning of "loathe" please do look it up in the internet instead of typing sh*t about a technology that you don't know of. Cheers~

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-29 12:20
  • IVIJ

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-06-29 09:56 from 7F7v - click to readQuoting an article posted over a year ago by some clueless boy on blog, nice.

Actually Super-OLED was awarded for having 97% color accuracy, google it.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-29 12:17
  • 3iJC

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-06-29 07:51 from 4sp4 - click to readTriluminos is another garbage LED backlit-LCD display. I have seen it and the colors are still washed out with grayish black levels. LED backlit-IPS LCD is better than Triluminos LED backlit-LCD and Super-OLED is better than all.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-29 11:53
  • 3iJC

Wanna know why? Cuz we've been tricked! Sales and marketing gimmick have strong forces of attraction. Do not be fooled. Like I said previously, AMOLED is just OLED with Samsung's branding.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-29 10:01
  • IVIG

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-06-28 18:42 from 3iJC - click to readFalse. AMOLED displays have inaccurate colors, and are harder to produce with higher pixel densities, which is why Samsung is STILL using Pentile on the Galaxy S4.

Also, unless your screen is very dark, AMOLED isn't even more efficient than LCD. In fact, it's far LESS efficient if there's a lot of white on your screen, like if you're browsing the web.

http://mobileraptor.blogspot.c...ion-and.html

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-29 09:56
  • 7F7v

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-06-28 10:24 from 3iJC - click to readDid you saw the triluminos display yet?? I swear your not but i do and that is the best display i ever saw!

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-29 07:51
  • 4sp4

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.