News - Reader comments

Nokia Lumia 1020 now official, 41MP OIS camera in tow

11 July, 2013 | Read the news | Post your comment
Nokia Lumia 1020 now official, 41MP OIS camera in tow - read the full textAfter an unprecedented amount of leaks, Stephen Elop took the stage at the Nokia Zoom Reinvented event in New York to proudly announce the Nokia Lumia 1020 - the company's new Windows Phone 8 cameraphone flagship. The Nokia Lumia 1020's centerpiece is the 41MP autofocus PureView camera with a...

 

Sort by:

Nokia when will you release this mobile in India

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-02 05:13
  • 98UP

Have a kyocera hydro vn droid.last was a nokia istil have and usehadfor yrs with 5mp camera,must say its a fine smartphone allso.

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-26 23:10
  • jBur

> In reply to and! @ 2013-07-12 03:49 from 6{2Z - click to readNew mobile late

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-31 19:39
  • U@yu

> In reply to vichu @ 2013-07-17 13:43 from uuTI - click to readIF you are talking about the comment right under you then they only asked if it did or did not

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-18 10:52
  • 4QSR

bull shit all nokia lumia 720 920 have bluetooth

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-17 13:43
  • uuTI

is this phone having bluetooth or not ??

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-17 11:09
  • tUib

Nokia rule

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-17 10:21
  • TL5j

love u nokia u are great

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-16 12:53
  • utE8

> In reply to kapil-sharma @ 2013-07-15 13:35 from 7qy9 - click to readUm they said Samsung innovates. They did not say what, how, or that everything is. Nor does just say they innovate imply all of that. So since nothing specific was implied you took what you wanted. You specifically chose things that you personally felt you could use to say they copied.

And again I have already pointed out this and the whole picture of that situation. But you ignore every other aspect to only bring that part up again and again which is exactly what I have been talking about.

Again. I came in and defended Nokia to that troll who was blabbing about Samsung. You replied to my comment agreeing. i replied to them multiple times. When you said what you said I made on short simple response saying you were acting like them. Nothing more. From there you made a long exaggerated reply that started this whole mess saying I only like and defend Samsung. And again then you brought up the LCD. Said i supported their comment. When I pointed out I corrected them you said sorry that you didnt see my reply. But if you didnt see my reply then how can you say I supported them? That's my point. And these are the false facts you keep using against me. I have brought this up over and over and the only thing you reply is only the part about my replying to your comment and saying it made me a troll and a Samsung fan. You ignored every ever part over and over. Only to continually only ask what you want and call me a fanboy and make up claims of me only liking Samsung to which even you know is false. Since you specifically know you made it up, keep dodging, and making these claims Im pretty sure you are an actual troll and are enjoying this.

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-15 23:36
  • 4QSR

> In reply to kapil-sharma @ 2013-07-15 13:31 from 7qy9 - click to readIgnoring as in sidetracking and negating what has been said only to ask what you want.
AGAIN. If you had actually read the comment you would see that I told you you answer was mainly answered already. It was in the post about the OS's. And if you had been ready my comments then you would've gotten the most of your answer from when you "read" that post and replied to it. You wouldn't have to keep asking.

And again. As I keep explaining you might not like the answer that was already there, but it is answer and I have answered almost everything else. Where you as usual keep dodging everything else. Like for the zillionth time how you started this over the comment. And now when you finally do bring it up you negate the rest of the facts I bring out only to tell me I was supposedly so angry over your reply to them instead of owning up to the rest of it that I pointed out. Then you dodge and negate everything else only to ask what more suits your need.
Since you have a reading problem though Android ran the same way in comparison on single and dual core as well. But it does more, is capable or more...They just moved on to quads because of advancements and to get even more performance.

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-15 23:26
  • 4QSR

> In reply to Ahme @ 2013-07-15 21:42 from fsVK - click to readIt's a flagship upgrade not a whole new phone. They still update their design a little though and look better than Iphone

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-15 23:18
  • 4QSR

The funny thing is that I thought only apple makes or uses the same design over n over again but I was wrong .Samsung with its s3 n s4 now nokia with its lumia 900, 928 , 925 n 1020 . Wats wrong with these companies ? Wats the whole point of buying a new phone when it looks the same as the old 1? it doesn't makes any sense . There is no difference between anything now only internal hardware difference . Which other companies can we look up to ?

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-15 21:42
  • fsVK

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-07-15 13:26 from 4QSR - click to readSo what exactly are you trying to say..that i chose things from s4 what i wanted to prove wrong?

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-15 13:35
  • 7qy9

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-07-15 13:22 from 4QSR - click to readPLZ get your eyes checked,how did i say you are ignoring me??i said you are giving irrelevant answer....and you are still doing that...plz if you dont have an answer than confess it but plz dont say the same thing again and again and again...i'll put it as simply as i can--why android using quadcore cpu lags BARELY more than other OSes which use old dual core cpu......and this time i am plz Answer what I ASKED!!!!you are really frustrating...

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-15 13:31
  • 7qy9

> In reply to kapil-sharma @ 2013-07-15 13:22 from 7qy9 - click to readYou say"they said Samsung innovates." My reply is they "said they were" As in they said Samsung was innovative. But it makes sense when you say "they said", but when I do it in direct reply to you it makes no sense?

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-15 13:26
  • 4QSR

nokia...please, please, please.. don use android. try to search "ten most common samsung galaxy s4 problem" (never user google)(90% of user don know android belongs to google) they filter everything..

try search with yahoo or other search engine. even octa core cant solve their problem.

nokia please don jump into android...it's like commit suicide....

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-15 13:23
  • sF%w

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-07-15 13:14 from 4QSR - click to readcan you be more clear here--" They said they were. So you took what you wanted from it and said they just copy. You were just doing to them what they did to you"...i cant make any sense out of these lines......

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-15 13:22
  • 7qy9

> In reply to kapil-sharma @ 2013-07-15 12:41 from 7qy9 - click to readStill twisting things around to say Im ignoring you when I keep answering almost everything you ask despit you ignoring almost everything I say including how all this started. Where does that say why. You butted in and negated what I said to ask a question more to your liking so I gave a simple answer. To which as usual you negated again claiming nothing was answered and that you were not satisfied. So you ignored it all, dodged my points and questions, including again how this all started. My answer sufficed and your question was already more nswered in my comment of the way they os's work and what they are capable of...and finally slightly finished by that statement that you found insufficient, but just claimed I did not answer at..Which in reality is what you are doing. And you will make the same claims in your next reply and dodge everything else as usual. Again you must be used to people giving up way before. Now what's really throwing you off is probably me be able to actually explain who did and said what and they way you have been dodging everything.

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-15 13:22
  • 4QSR

> In reply to hobbit @ 2013-07-15 11:44 from 7qy9 - click to readHere we go again you ignoring everything else as usual and only asking/saying what you want. And exactly. They said they were. So you took what you wanted from it and said they just copy. You were just doing to them what they did to you. And again you ignoring where I had already been in that and made a long reply helping you and defending Nokia. To which you replied back liking and agreeing. Then when you did that I made a small very simple reply telling you that you are just acting like them. You flew over the rocker and made a long exaggerated statement of how I only like and defend Samsung and troll this fanboy that. Since then you keep dodging the whole thing only to bring up what you want or to continue calling me a troll. Also without providing anything to back it up. Probably because you know thats not true due to you seeing me defend Nokia. You just enjoy saying...but normally someone wouldve given up with your antics and games a long time agao.

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-15 13:14
  • 4QSR

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-07-15 11:40 from 4QSR - click to readyou are just answering what you want to...i never questioned why android uses quad core,i asked why even after using quadcore android lags more(even barely more) then OSes using old dual cores?If you still dont answer sensibly and repeat the same answer you gave last two timr ...then I can swear to god that you are the one who is twisting sentences....

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-15 12:41
  • 7qy9

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.