News - Reader comments

After TSMC affair Apple might return to Samsung in 2015

15 July, 2013 | Read the news | Post your comment
After TSMC affair Apple might return to Samsung in 2015 - read the full textApple and Samsung are having very public fights in courts around the globe, but the two companies were working quite well together with Samsung supplying components for Apple's gadgets. Inevitably, the legal spats lead to talk that Apple will be moving on to TSMC for its next chip...

 

Sort by:

just so you know Apple designed the chip, its just they outsourced the manufacturing to Samsung.

So basically these chips are still within apple specifications and innovations to make sure IOS runs faster w/o the need of having higher clock rates and cores running ...

Apple are not using the SoC Samsung made for their Galaxy lines.

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-16 11:24
  • v0qZ

> In reply to ... @ 2013-07-16 09:56 from v0qT - click to readSomewhat. But they also use LG display, Sony cams"up from when they used Omni Vision", and even Motorola and Nokia parts. They put everything in it.

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-16 10:15
  • 4QSR

> In reply to harish @ 2013-07-16 08:40 from vIg@ - click to readProcessor, ram, nand, audio, ssd, Retina display, and couple things. These are used in any or all of Iphone, Ipod, Ipad, Macbook, and such devices.

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-16 10:13
  • 4QSR

> In reply to u-m-add @ 2013-07-16 09:44 from ib7J - click to readIncorrect. They use Samsung chips. The newer SOC is a different design, but with apple's record of everything else in the past it is extremely unlikely they did it themselves....but slightly possible.

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-16 10:11
  • 4QSR

So does that mean iPhone's are really all Galaxy phones in disguise?!

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-16 09:56
  • v0qT

> In reply to mansoor @ 2013-07-16 00:35 from KIAg - click to readSamsung only manufacturer. they not create chip for apple. Apple design its own chip. Its Apple technology using samsung product.

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-16 09:44
  • ib7J

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-07-16 08:31 from ft8R - click to readi think ip5 still using samsung component

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-16 09:32
  • ib7J

i want to know what components samsung supplying to apple

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-16 08:40
  • vIg@

Just after someone gets killed by an exploding iphone then they want to jump back in bed with samsung.typical

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-16 08:31
  • ft8R

apple is a waste company they doesnt manufacture anything depend on others.yet they call themselves innovation poor apple

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-16 08:23
  • YQAh

Apple...

i more lesson for you
Don't mess with your suplier...

and i'm not a SAMSUNG user
i'm an Apple fanboy

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-16 07:58
  • uCHT

Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha.

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-16 07:39
  • jRvg

> In reply to techworm @ 2013-07-16 06:37 from 6iRh - click to readCopy is perfectly fine so long as you pay the price and stick to the rules.

Samsung copied without paying.. so thats not OK.

It has nothing to do with copy me so i copy you .. copy everywhere childish comment.

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-16 07:36
  • PGXj

> In reply to bruce-wayne @ 2013-07-15 22:48 from 7q54 - click to readWhat Apple did is stealing, copying other ideas, get them paid and grab the patent. One thing was brilliant about Steve Jobs was his marketing ideas.

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-16 06:37
  • 6iRh

> In reply to se7engold @ 2013-07-16 03:51 from Bgdq - click to readI think that's the exact point. There was another case I dont think Apple won. When you think about the cost of the parts from Samsung it makes sense.

Apple wants enough money to not only get all those parts free, but even get paid profit to use those parts

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-16 05:46
  • 4QSR

> In reply to se7engold @ 2013-07-16 03:54 from Bgdq - click to readAt the time of the 1 Billion award, that 1 Billion was slightly less than the amount of money Apple spent for parts from Samsung in 1 QUARTER.

Given Samsung's quarter over quarter over quarter earnings in the last year, all I can say is "it didn't matter".

What does matter is that in many people's mind both companies have resorted to dirty business practices, which was only reinforced in the recent ebooks antitrust ruling against Apple.

http://allthingsd.com/20130710...trust-trial/

Although it was Tim Cook's decision to fight, it was a memo and e-mails from none other than Steve Jobs himself that was the smoking gun.

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-16 05:31
  • GT6G

> In reply to Silver @ 2013-07-15 23:57 from jxXT - click to readYet in business world money talks louder than ego. So I think we won't see that scene and Samsung will keep on supplying chips to Apple.

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-16 03:54
  • Bgdq

Well, with all the court-saga it's possible Apple got all the chips for free (or at least some big discount)

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-16 03:51
  • Bgdq

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-07-16 02:03 from GT6G - click to readmost of all ..it is the quAntity they can manufacture

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-16 03:24
  • 6t4B

> In reply to bruce-wayne @ 2013-07-16 00:10 from 7q54 - click to readThat's sales and general public. And Nokia Sony Samsung and Motorola were well known then.
That has nothing to do with weather they jumped on the bandwagon or not. Did you even think out that reply or just not like it and go off?

  • Reply
  • 2013-07-16 02:12
  • 4QSR

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.