Whatever you say guys...I'm out...you can say whatever but I still like android and ios...still think its better..doesn't say wp is worst but still lagging behind..and dosent say Nokia is worst again but Nokia is great but still only for the camera..and you know I'm right...windows only great in computers....
AnonD-61409, 16 Jul 2013I thought my comment had been erased. Ha. Sometimes they do. Btw, I couldn't care less abou... moreI think it's kids to get the perfect toys...I'm one of them...maybe you to...and about the camera, it's not important to me also..it just an added bonus...
AnonD-156746, 16 Jul 2013exactly...android is almost known everywhere in the world whereas wp8 is not so well known,and... moreInferior maybe...if its a computer it's not...even windows have a hard time with wp8 comparing to win7 and xp...if you see in every comment in gsm...they all talk about specs..what is bigger than the others...then they talk about os...I have use all os in my life that I know..still using now..but wp will be grown boring when time fly...everybody need a change..look and feel..that's why even ios or android user keep changing it because they can..can wp do that...does wp phone spec better than iphone or android...other than the camera..what else you got that can challenge ios or android..
AnonD-61409, 16 Jul 2013Are those bezels a joke?
Huge bezels!!!
What a pity. The rest is fine, but not better than ... moreI thought my comment had been erased. Ha. Sometimes they do.
Btw, I couldn't care less about an smartphone's camera. You all complaining must be photography enthusiasts or kids looking for a perfect toy. -.-
- L.
AnonD-124528, 16 Jul 2013Why do you all always comparing to the old android os...yes it worst but today's is not..we se... morebecause if you see the comment i'm replying to says wp7 was worse than first android versions...
MdN, 16 Jul 2013Symbian is not simpler, even now it has some features and possibilities that others won't have... moreWell I have use Symbian and it simpler by my perspective...they use ios or android not because its simpler to people, but because it have more feature and apps and whatever comparing to Symbian...maybe Symbian have feature that others don't have maybe that because it doesn't really needed...in today's world..we cn get what the old left behind...only the matters is did we need it or not...
AnonD-124528, 16 Jul 2013Symbian is superior the old days because it was simpler and more to known around the world...a... moreexactly...android is almost known everywhere in the world whereas wp8 is not so well known,android is simple to people,people find wp8 hard to use it right now....but it is improving,does that mean it is inferior to ios and android?
MdN, 16 Jul 2013A 20MP camera with a sensor smaller than the one on Nokia N8 12MP camera, and no Xenon...Buy a dslr or lumia 1020..case close...
AnonD-124528, 16 Jul 2013Symbian is superior the old days because it was simpler and more to known around the world...a... moreSymbian is not simpler, even now it has some features and possibilities that others won't have any time soon. Others got popular because of simplicity for the common user, but at least Android is catching up.
AnonD-156746, 16 Jul 2013cupcake did not even had a stock video player and lagged like hell ...wp7 was infinitly better... moreWhy do you all always comparing to the old android os...yes it worst but today's is not..we seeing what today's phone can give us..not that old is that already died..
AnonD-156746, 16 Jul 2013you are clearly a fanboy then....in 2009,you saw symbian everywhere,so symbian was superior to... moreYou can say what you want... I just stating the fact...yes..the old days Symbian is everywhere..so where is it now..what is everywhere now...ios and android..you can say wp is gaining strength and popularity..but clearly not as much as android and ios...another reality check..
Anonymous, 16 Jul 2013Windows Phone 7 is even worst.cupcake did not even had a stock video player and lagged like hell ...wp7 was infinitly better than that....
AnonD-156746, 16 Jul 2013so symbian was a superior os than ios and android because it was older than those two in 2009.... moreSymbian is superior the old days because it was simpler and more to known around the world...android phone is hard to use and people doesn't know how to operate it..now android is easy to use and know around the world..because we have grown advance..that's because Symbian is died today..cause Symbian is not that advance comparing to android and ios even wp...
AnonD-124528, 16 Jul 2013By everybody's parameter if u ask me..by research, by media..by public...please tell me everyw... moreyou are clearly a fanboy then....in 2009,you saw symbian everywhere,so symbian was superior to android....
laggdroids, 16 Jul 2013such a lame comment..learnt the fact that android took 6 years to develop itself. Cupcake,Donu... moreWindows Phone 7 is even worst.
laggdroids, 16 Jul 2013such a lame comment..learnt the fact that android took 6 years to develop itself. Cupcake,Donu... moreIt doesn't matter...the old days of android..people won't ready for it..their mind don't go that advance yet...so they still using Nokia Symbian because its simpler...today's not that simple my freind...and you know that...in the world of touch screen phone..that's when the android take the lead...
AnonD-124528, 16 Jul 2013It doesn't matter how long...what we need is right now..you can't say you lag behind because y... moreso symbian was a superior os than ios and android because it was older than those two in 2009...that is the most illogical comment i've ever seen...
If these specs are correct, then this simply isn't the camera phone rumours made it out to be.
It can still be a good smartphone, with a pretty good all round spec-sheet. But it won't offer anything special over the next bunch of high end phones.
I really hope, that ine day soon, Sony will get the guys who develop phoes and the ones behind the RX100/II in the same room, talking about how to achieve something similar for mobiles (fitting a large sensor in a really compact format, and achieve good high ISO pics).
Sure, what Nokia achieved with the 808 and 1020 is even more impressive in it's field, than what Sony did with the RX100, in it's field. But the RX100 is more sensible (actually getting a pixel level resolution close to what is to be expected from a Anti Alising filter equipped 20MP camera sensor, the 808/1020 are both far behind the per pixel level resolution that can be expected from a 41MP Anti Alising Filter equipped and I strongly believe that ditching those extra pixels for larger ones and a lower resolution would have been a better compromise for the 1020).
AnonD-156746, 16 Jul 2013microsoft made wp8,google acquired android,their is a lot of difference....Who cares? Android is much better than Windows Phone 8.
Tip us
1.7m 126k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up