News - Reader comments

16GB Motorola Moto X to cost $575 SIM-free

02 August, 2013 | Read the news | Post your comment
16GB Motorola Moto X to cost $575 SIM-free - read the full textMotorola Moto X was unveiled yesterday and the smartphone will soon be available from the top 5 carriers in the USA. The 16 GB variant of the Moto X is priced at $200 and the 32 GB unit costs you $250 with a two-year contract. At the announcement event Motorola did not announce the pricing...

 

Sort by:

$575? Can this phone warp us to a space ship? So we can travel around the world in like few second, and our money is same value around the world 1$=1€=1¥=1for the rest of the world currency. Motorola phones dropped to 1/2 after you purchase. Or probably it contain super fast component inside, That can calculate our galaxy total planet 100% accurate, and can calculate worm holes location accurately. Lol inflations in the making.

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-03 16:31
  • KZ8P

Motorola is refusing anything except to fail

Very expensive phone with no much great difference from nexus 4
Good job Motorola :-)

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-03 16:16
  • fmkc

Wow! So the 16GB for $575 and 32GB for $629...so what if these devices had a 1080p HD screen and a Snapdragon 800 chipset...what will the price be...maybe $675 for 16GB and $729 for 32GB. I have decided as a Nexus man i will just wait for the new Nexus phone.

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-03 16:05
  • TfjR

Mid-range phone with "Designed and assembled in USA" label on it made this phone ultra-expensive. This is crazy.

Go for Nexus 4 instead.

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-03 15:55
  • wMHH

Motorola , stay in America !!! 575 euro in europa for this phone ?
my god !!!! For 350 Eoro in Romania i buy LG G975 ( NO CONTRACT)
With 200 Euro i buy HTC ONE, with contract.
Please, stay in America! Price=Joke!

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-03 15:37
  • nDCD

575?? HAHA, OMG I SWEAR I LAUGHED, WHEN I SAW THIS!

It's no better than Xperia SP or Nexus 4, why pay much more?

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-03 15:26
  • 3Q5i

Rofl. That's a horrible price. This phone is an epic fail. Had it been ~$299 off-contract, insta-win, but as-is it's a disgusting failure and terribly uncompetitive.

Moto is gone.

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-03 14:20
  • vkMn

let me know when its three hundred and sixty nine dollars

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-03 13:56
  • 4@ur

What!!!! This is a joke 575$ for a phone that costs 225$ to manufacture? Double the price, go with god motorola....

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-03 13:34
  • prpP

coming back to Asia, especially to Singapore ?

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-03 13:28
  • uH@a

That's why they are spending $500+ million in marketing to make the phone appear better than it is and get us to buy it!

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-03 13:23
  • jBu9

Why would you buy this over the LG nexus 4. I mean at least make it competitive. Here in Pakistan you can get a SGS4 i9505 for under $600. And the i9500 for $630.

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-03 13:21
  • 258X
  • techlover no genius
  • Report
  • Rating0

Google common we have become accustomed to overkill specs like quad cores and 2 gb ram not last gen standards...

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-03 13:02
  • 39x{

The only thing moto x has is lot of colors . Paying a premium price for a bit of customization is a waste of money.
And of course increase the price by making it in USA.

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-03 12:13
  • 2SP3

> In reply to raj @ 2013-08-03 07:42 from YQVs - click to read250$ really ? :)

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-03 11:54
  • rJDB

not worth for this type of user's interface

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-03 11:49
  • utF$

> In reply to raj @ 2013-08-03 07:42 from YQVs - click to readIt would be like a dream come true if it does...

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-03 11:36
  • 2SP3

> In reply to eken @ 2013-08-03 09:06 from qDj@ - click to readI absolutely agree with you. Cutting SD slots and only offering 16-32 will not be enough for many.

It would be enough with 32GB for me, but let's be honest and see what Apple has done the past years. Granted they overcharge like crazy for more space, but at least they offer it.

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-03 09:36
  • m}iU

too greedy.. 299usd shld be the right pricing for the spec and feature.. 575 will be too expensive and rather go for upcoming mi3 at lower price.. who need a value added features at a high premium?

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-03 09:34
  • RILN

> In reply to Motofail @ 2013-08-03 03:33 from 8RHX - click to readJust because it has same name of GPU, does not mean the same performance. Check first before posting useless comments.

This gets double the results in GPU, CPU and CPU+GPU tests. Same off-screen results as S4 and One. Only this has half resolution so in actual on-screen performanece it's the better option. And has the better camera.

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-03 09:30
  • m}iU

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.