News - Reader comments

Samsung preps 16MP OIS camera, won't premiere on Note III

26 August, 2013 | Read the news | Post your comment
Samsung preps 16MP OIS camera, won't premiere on Note III - read the full textA new report coming from Korea reveals Samsung is working on a 16MP camera module with optical image stabilization. The new sensor is intended to be used in company's upcoming Galaxy flagships. Unfortunately Samsung's suppliers won't make enough sensors in time for the Galaxy Note III release....

 

Sort by:

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-08-27 03:26 from v0Xt - click to readdont forget samsung galaxy s5 mini too hahahah

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-27 20:59
  • y{jd

> In reply to x @ 2013-08-27 12:06 from XMV$ - click to readthe rom on the s4 is like atleast 1.5gb it is 1.2gb on the prerelease s3 4.2.2 rom

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-27 19:18
  • 6jgQ

> In reply to Mobilemaster @ 2013-08-26 16:02 from 0Uu8 - click to readIn the past, android fanboys said that they dont need dual core, quad core and blah blah.

Now they need 8. yes, EIGHT cores and gigs of ram to function smoothly (is it really running smoothly even with those specs for a gaming PC?)

lol.

technology is fast advancing. who knows. we may need 82mp's next year?

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-27 13:06
  • XMV$

> In reply to Be Cool @ 2013-08-26 18:28 from n7RF - click to readcan you post a link that says that 8 cores is the best?
it terms of functionality, maybe yes for some (some cheap tricks like s blah blah may do for some)

but in everyday life, it sucks because u cant use it ( too much data cost )

no much use in normal life, just bloating the phone up.

16gb version of s4 = less than 12gb available. lol.

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-27 12:06
  • XMV$

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-08-27 04:59 from IaHc - click to readi guess you missed the bus on that one...

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-27 11:35
  • 6jgQ

I believe it will be a boring incremental upgrade like S3 to S4 with nothing to shout about.

seem like samsung ran out of idea

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-27 10:15
  • IaHc

> In reply to johnehms33 @ 2013-08-27 01:38 from vaN% - click to readIt is not an advantage over others because others also provide those features,again i'm not just talking about flagships here,they chose not to give those features in.more expensive phone for quality reaonons,you would know the strength of unibody design if you would held onto an s4 and lumia 920 for a year,and then tell me which is better,S4 sold 10 million phones not because it was above other flagships,but because it was the successor of s3,which was actually a great phone in it's year......

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-27 09:09
  • XuCQ

> In reply to UniCorn @ 2013-08-27 03:16 from uCmb - click to readNo disrespect,but those again are your opinions,most people would agree touchwiz lags compared to others,or galaxy does not look as great as htc one or lumia 925 ,etc again i am saying something which sets samsung apart,not just on flagships,s i've said beats audio on HTC,pureview on nokia.....

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-27 08:59
  • XuCQ

better samsung provide something which has high quality.... i have experienced with some samsung product. and what i got... is lagging n not smooth when i do some gaming stuff. and d one that i use the latest gadget from samsung. my experience is never good from samsung product. people may be will see that the spec is so good. but if it maximise utilise used it, lagging n unsmooth is what people will get.
nb: for people ever use maxismise their phone. not d one only do camera, messaging, borowsing, hearing music n calling for theeir phone

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-27 08:51
  • TII1

How is it differnt from LG G2 ? more megapixel ?

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-27 06:40
  • P}vn

Samsung better come out with something that beat competitors

Note 3 fatter than Sony Xperia Z Ultra
Note 3 screen smaller than Xperia Z Ultra and Huawei phablet
Note 3 MP not as high as Z1 and Lumia

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-27 05:07
  • IaHc

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-08-26 14:59 from X0%Z - click to read16MP is so yesterday. Sony Z1 in 2013 already 20MP and Nokia in 2013 41MP.

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-27 05:02
  • IaHc

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-08-27 03:26 from v0Xt - click to readand I believe S5 will still have the annoying physical home button and the irritating SAMOLED screen.

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-27 05:01
  • IaHc

> In reply to Where is 64gb? @ 2013-08-27 04:22 from PGXj - click to readI already gave up on Samsung when I saw Galaxy S4.

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-27 05:00
  • IaHc

> In reply to 9oo ooo ooo @ 2013-08-27 04:14 from 6jgQ - click to readSamsung use USA technology - Android , what's up?

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-27 04:59
  • IaHc

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-08-27 03:26 from v0Xt - click to readWhere are the 64gb samsung promises?.. ALL air.

BBC accuse them, now they are afraid, i am so happy they did, because they cannnot continue cheating like this.

In the year 2014... If samsung does not move to 128gb, and have 64gb as minimum requirements... i am not impress.

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-27 04:22
  • PGXj

> In reply to YuYu Alsalmi @ 2013-08-26 21:34 from arfA - click to readcongratulations... :-)

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-27 04:18
  • 6jgQ

> In reply to Anzio Mozie @ 2013-08-27 03:16 from IVIx - click to readand sony uses samsung memory...s0? what's up

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-27 04:14
  • 6jgQ

> In reply to Anzio Mozie @ 2013-08-27 03:16 from IVIx - click to read Yes. Because SONY is also real tech company. But not Apple.

  • Reply
  • 2013-08-27 03:49
  • n7RF

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.