News - Reader comments

LG KC560 surfaces - did someone say tacky or what?

LG KC560 surfaces - did someone say tacky or what? - read the full textThe LG KC560 handset leaked today with a supposed release date just in time for the holidays. Having multimedia as its key element the LG KC560 does have some… okay, "interesting" design solutions....

 

OK..GSM arena..consider it ugly...but why when another manufacturer create a phone which is really ugly u call it very very nice only becauz its SE.

Common...i like this site and the reviews are really good but i dont need to read ugly for a new phone before people see the photos & i dont need to read that Nseries design is ugly with each Nseries phone review and preview.

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-10 23:09
  • 0nVC

LG Rock...

I dont know why people just say LG's are just made to be cheap? So? When there is a expensive phone you all say "omfg i want it but its expensive...sad". LG phones are just cool phone i own Secret and its the best mobile for me ever. (I also own Shine too...)I was always trying those not-top phones like LG, Dragon, Sharp, Sagem. Samsung's are also good.

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-10 23:06
  • pu4b

> In reply to ars @ 2008-11-10 21:24 from n{x{I don't know what Microwens is...
I know that LG makes TV, refrigerator, washers and dryers...
Mmmhh, cell phone MUST definitely be one of their expertise...
Maybe one day, LG will make a cell phone that is combined with a steamer for your laundry... Hehehehe.
Peace!

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-10 22:50
  • i}dR

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-11-10 18:43 from mFEUGeez!
No need to be so offended; what are you... The owner of the company?
Is it your grandmother's? Or just plain LG fanatic (even more path3tic...)

If you don't like this website,
you are more than welcome to get off this site and never come back.
It is a common knowledge that LG is a cheap phone for mass market, so its design IS kind of tacky and bland...
Just accept the reality...

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-10 22:45
  • i}dR


Tell me why y'all say its ugly? I mean I think its a little big but ugly. Not really. Guess everyone is opinionated....CC

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-10 21:37
  • jsta

> In reply to DeJust @ 2008-11-10 20:59 from p$Kxright,lg was out with 5mp before n95

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-10 21:31
  • n{x{

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-11-10 19:14 from u1wDlg has 8mp phone out,''leader'' nokia hasn't,video taken from old viewty easily beats any new n-series so who should make microwens?

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-10 21:24
  • n{x{

The KC750 is really ugly too...

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-10 20:59
  • nSHG

> In reply to Ryo Jin @ 2008-11-10 18:51 from ji{RThis phone is beautiful. For as long as I've known LG it was the first one to put a 5MP camera ( KG5xx? maybe the 1st in my country, South Africa) and the first to make a smartphone (touchscreen) without an "OS" with the Viewity.

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-10 20:59
  • p$Kx

cheap look of a cheap phone why dont lg makes only MicroWaves?

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-10 19:14
  • u1wD

Some people here said that LG Mobile doesn't have good design.

But remember LG KF750 Secret won Best Stylish Phone at UK Mobile Choice Consumer Awards 2008, LG KE770 won Best Design Product at RedDot Design Award 2007, etc.

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-10 18:51
  • ji{R

why tacky? Because it has gold??? Spare me, who the hell are you? Coco channel??? Actually I like black and gold, so whats your problem? You're better than me? Shame on you gsmarena, what kind of website is this?

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-10 18:43
  • mFEU

in my country we call this "GRASA" (grease).... this HAS to be meant for cheap ppl ...OMG...Black Gold and lights ...ugly!!!... i would expect more from LG designs !!!

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-10 18:34
  • xsM5

looks like the Nokia N85 this mobile,LG always try to compete but there quality an relibilty as always been below par,they started off getting themselves a bad name releasing mobiles for the "3" network an no phone turned out to be either good or reliable,thats why i have kept away from there mobiles an alot of other people do as well,so they have got to upgrade there quality to compete with the top mobiles but with cheap mobiles for kids they do well because there mobiles are that cheaper than the others

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-10 17:46
  • 3paG

> In reply to LG lover @ 2008-11-10 16:56 from wr9NDon't get me wrong... Samsung is probably alright...
(Not that I want to own one after a horrible experience with it! Fool me once is enough... No more Samsung for me...)
Nokia + SE have always kept me satisfied (Especially SE Customer Service - One of the best!! They sent me FREE phones!!)
It is LG that I question here.
Sexy...? You want to call a phone with a brand 'Life's Good'...Sexy?
;-p Thank you for making me smile in this rainy Monday!

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-10 17:26
  • i}dR

Man... The LG KC560 looks like the kind of phone a pimp would've used back in the 70's... I mean, what's with the disco ball?? Bet someone down at LG's design department is still wearing their bottom bells... They shoulda called it the LG Boogie-woogie-phone! Let's all make love not war!! Lol Peace out!

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-10 17:20
  • G2GS

oh really? i think SE designer doesnt have creative idea for their phones..look so robotic..samsung n LG are sexy..

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-10 16:56
  • wr9N

http://www.mobile-review.com/a...nov-08.shtml
there`s also some info about LG KC560.

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-10 16:47
  • 03Ky

nooo renoir sells for about 600-700 US dollars right now unlocked

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-10 16:44
  • x3pL

I don't get it with LG phones...
Their models look so lame and cheap.
With enough models from Nokia, Sony Ericsson and HTC floating around, I wonder what's the big deal with LG (especially these 'gold' models)
Perhaps I already answered it:
LG is cheap(er)...
Peace Out!

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-10 16:42
  • i}dR

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.