News - Reader comments

Meizu MX3 spotted flexing Octa muscle on AnTuTu, bests the S4

04 September, 2013 | Read the news | Post your comment
Meizu MX3 spotted flexing Octa muscle on AnTuTu, bests the S4 - read the full textThe Meizu MX3 was unveiled the other day, but it has already popped up on the popular AnTuTu score list with a very high result. The Exynos 5 Octa 5410-packing smartphone posted a score above 29K, which puts it above the Samsung Galaxy S4 I9500, which has the same processor. Aside from the...

 

Sort by:

> In reply to the.matchless @ 2013-09-04 15:37 from 6P}@ - click to readthe main power (4cores) are used only when used by heavy software (apps) and benchmarking.. other wise it just uses the other ones which uses less power...it is not a true octacore..it is only marketed as one because it has 8 cores total

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-05 18:47
  • m@Ww

> In reply to Kevin Samuel @ 2013-09-04 16:41 from y{jR - click to readdon't forget to look at the size of the rom too...samsung vs cm...the 4.2.2 S3rom that leaked before is over 900mb!

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-05 18:40
  • m@Ww

> In reply to darknite @ 2013-09-04 16:51 from YQ8u - click to readIt means that you achieve 25000 (25k) score in AnTuTu Benchmark

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-05 04:05
  • thu9

I got 28455 in my galaxy S4 I9500...it need some tweaking or mod to make it optimize with its hardware

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-04 17:11
  • tued

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-09-04 16:35 from Im42 - click to readWhat does 25k score in an tu tu means?!

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-04 16:51
  • YQ8u

> In reply to raverrain @ 2013-09-04 15:50 from U{tC - click to readi agree. It's about software optimization that could deliver a great user experience using the hardware to it's fully potential. Not this kind of benchmark.

I have Galaxy S3 mini. Score about 6.5k. The device lag when using stock firmware.

Then i root and installed custom roms. I choose Cyanogenmod 10.1 which more like pure android experience (Nexus devices). Benchmark increase to 6.7-7.1k (Yes it increase because Samsung's Touchwiz and other Samsung thing is removed, decrease RAM and increase score in Antutu's RAM section so more user-available RAM). And this custom rom delivers what i need. Super smooth, run apps n games with a good performance. Dual core 1GHZ and MAli-400MP single core delivers what is needed. Not being bogged down by Samsung's Touchwiz and others.

So, a good phone is how far a software optimization goes for a device. I really hope that samsung should stop seeking for muscle phone but optimize their amazing touchwiz.

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-04 16:41
  • y{jR

I got 25600 on my quad core S4 in AnTuTu.

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-04 16:35
  • Im42

Mind, Antutu 3 scores are not compatible with Antutu 4. And Antutu 4.0.1 scores are not compatible with Antutu 4.0 and 4.0 preview.

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-04 16:30
  • x1nH

> In reply to raverrain @ 2013-09-04 15:50 from U{tC - click to readYes friend....somehow i agree your comment.antutu no. are meaningless and gsm arena keep on published this no based on antutu score.how about gl bench2.7 ,egypt hd2.1 and3d mark.

The real performance can be trust when the benchmark instructed the cpu/gpu render real life 3d graphic that carrying heavy task.

Your eyes will judge the real performance. Not the no. Of score.
For me....i never trust antutu as what anandtech also oppose to believe.
Even my nex.4 antutu lower than note2 ....but....the gpu computations horse power much much faster while running 3d mark test.adreno 320 is so much powerful in the nex4.

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-04 16:27
  • vV5G

Competitors are getting close to Samsung... Micromax expected to beat it in q3 in India, others are surpassing it in benchmarks...the process has begun !

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-04 15:55
  • YQ8u

This android oem cheats the benchmark score. Look at s4 it self lags a lot(8core). I feel like throwing my s4 out of window sometime. Don't befooled by score. Go for raw performance. Even google made phone moto x itself doesn't have good benchmark score. Google know its not muscles that make a good phone its the way the muscles r used

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-04 15:50
  • U{tC

MX3 is optimized for Antutu. Alot of chinese manufacturer are ban or caught cheating in Antutu, like samsung.

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-04 15:45
  • t7}9

> In reply to sams @ 2013-09-04 14:33 from 61vM - click to readLolz seriously? it just got beat by a Quad core chip-set although I do admit that its got beat by the Z Ultra which is a real beast.

By the way Antutu is an overall benchmark and takes into account the effects of Ram performance, memory I/O etc. and so it doesn't represent the pure CPU performance. I'd be interested in looking at Benchmark Pi and Linpack from Meizu MX3 where I am sure the Octa will show pretty much the same results as before.

To me OCTA cores make no sense at this point as a much more complex OS would be required to make real use of all the cores and a complex OS isn't quite whats required in a mobile device so far, the future, however , may defy this...

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-04 15:37
  • 6P}@

any phone with octa core processor other than Samsung will be fast because Sammy don't know how to optimise their software.

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-04 15:28
  • 39xV

My HTC One (m7ul) scores 25562 in Antutu. It's not overclocked but i have Maximus HD rom. It's basicaly a HTC One Google Edition 4.3 with the Sense 5 on top and it has just the basic apps preinstaled, no unnecessary bloatware. It runs perfectly. PS:I like those Meizu scores .

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-04 14:45
  • LaEU

Octa rules

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-04 14:33
  • 61vM

No name phones will cruel the world.

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-04 14:33
  • 0xMq

> In reply to SteveCHOPS @ 2013-09-04 14:29 from tCQw - click to readIt's completely different chipsets. Comparing clock speeds is pretty pointless. As it always have been.

What's interesting is to see how much better performance Meizu gets out of Sammys HW. Aparantly they have much better software engineers then Sammy.

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-04 14:32
  • 5i4e

Awesome. It even catches up with the Xperia Ultra Z despite having 0.6 less clock speed.

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-04 14:29
  • tCQw

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.