News - Reader comments

Here go the first Galaxy Note 3 camera samples from IFA 2013

06 September, 2013 | Read the news | Post your comment
Here go the first Galaxy Note 3 camera samples from IFA 2013 - read the full textWe've got some early camera samples from the Samsung Galaxy Note 3, which we were able to snatch off the Samsung booth at the IFA 2013 floor. While we like to step outside for these matters we were still happy to see how the 13 MP snapper on the Note 3's back does even inside the venue. Before...

 

Sort by:

The camera on the note 3 is terrible even when compared to my older, outdated phones. This is a flagship phone and it should have a good camera. Period.

  • Reply
  • 2014-03-05 03:12
  • q@Xj

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-10-05 17:30 from kV4$ - click to readI totally agree with you. I previously own a Note 2 and prefer the camera more than the Note 3's. I could take indoor pictures which are so much sharper and clearer on my Note 2. Note 3 camera disappoints...

  • Reply
  • 2013-11-16 11:54
  • uCmF

> In reply to Scorpio @ 2013-09-07 10:20 from HIfi - click to readI've had the note 3 for two weeks and like most of it. What irritates me is that like my gs3, it I takes horrible pictures, nearly the same despite "specs". Watercolors in the rain is the best description I can say. All light situations, flash, no flash, zoom or not, etc., yet not one picture with any detail. I have an old 1.3mp camera that takes better pictures!. In fact the front cam on the note 3 takes pictures nearly identical to the "13mp" rear. Hey Samsung, did you forget to put the right sensor in some phones? Since they are made in china, it wouldn't surprise me. I spent way too much on this phone, and don't get me started on how bad the radios are. Even full wifi signals get an "unstable connection" error message. I'm not happy at all....

  • Reply
  • 2013-10-26 18:17
  • Ibxs

The Galaxy Note II has the best camera in regards to the Samsung line. The S4 takes grainy photos even in bright light, and the Note 3 does as well. I don't know if this is a firmware issue or what, but Samsung needs to quickly fix it.

  • Reply
  • 2013-10-05 17:30
  • kV4$

picture quality doesn't look as good as the s4

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-18 16:12
  • PIaJ

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-09-06 22:41 from HInx - click to readi got to admit this HTC camera is very very good. I am not using HTC.

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-09 04:55
  • IaHc

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-09-07 11:43 from nCfs - click to readcome on, S4 and Note 3 are not marketed as superior camera phone.

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-09 04:55
  • IaHc

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-09-08 12:54 from uSg% - click to readnote a apple-to-apple comparison as Note 3 is not positioned as a camera phone. its strength is note-taking s-pen

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-09 04:54
  • IaHc

for everybody out there if sony,lg,and ofcourse the now taken by MS , nokia are doing so well with their phones than why arent they being purchased...its like praising a classic movie but not watching it cause you know from inside you dont wanna watch it...people everywhere are buying samsung( or otherwise they wont be no. 1 in smartphones now) and people just dont care about sony , lg , or now non-existent NOKIA or they wont be in loss or just wont be selling their companies...samsung has proven track record over the time in smartphones so stop trolling about plastic , cheap etc etc etc and face the truth...

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-08 15:07
  • RBA}

dude, you seem to be more aptly paid by sony rather than me...in my post i never even for a word talk about benchmarks...i m a doctor nd these benchmarks dont matter for me atleast in practical life...have used 6 sony phones ( now how can u say that its a botched up story ... have you been following me lol )...i was once a fan of sony with their walkman series but started having trouble with my each phone , latest being your loved companies not so distant flagship xperia z.. maybe the worst phone i have ever handled in my life...got rid of it in just 17 days by selling it for almost a loss of 75% of what i purchased it...have being using samsung galaxy s4 since june 20( it launched in my country on 18 june) and have got every game that you think can be downloaded on my phone be it nfs mw , asphalt 8 , dead trigger or any other that you can think...atleast for me i have never had a single glitch in my phone or so called lag...maybe sony paid you enough to try their phones for free and praise them on every forums...in that case i want to know actually how much you got paid...???

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-08 14:58
  • RBA}

I want to see proper camera comparison between z1 and note3. Indoor photos with same ISO, then we will see which one is superior.

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-08 12:54
  • uSg%

> In reply to Nightmare @ 2013-09-06 17:45 from j8wI - click to readWell, if the Note 3 using the same camera modules as the S4 then it should give very detailed pictures. If it is blurry then perhaps the reviewer did not hold the device properly or out of focus. Remember that S4 performed well in almost all areas except in VERY LOW to ALMOST NO light conditions although not as good as Lumia 1020. Night mode on S4 was functioning better than those on HTC One in low light condition...So I presume that the Note 3 will be good enough and on par with most of the current flagship devices.

Didn't you read the reviews about Z1 in gsmarena or other sites? The picture quality wasn't mind-blowing at all. Was just marginally better than the current flagship devices except Lumia 1020 of course. Don't tell me the comparison from Sony page, please.

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-07 23:01
  • DBAh

> In reply to persophile @ 2013-09-07 13:59 from 44rF - click to readhahaha surely just wait, if its the same as Xperia Z, low light quality will suck harder than actually sucks the note3, believe me.

Xperia S,Z and older xperia TM devices, ( since the neo )
sony added to much compression to images, and a lot
of post processing filters, not like samsung so
before talking plz, research....

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-07 15:50
  • 3Npj

embarrassingly crappy and low quality.... I will definitely go for Z1 or Z Ultra.

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-07 13:59
  • 44rF

Still the same crappy low light performance as S4.

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-07 11:43
  • nCfs

it seems companies try to fool us with mega pixel! we need something better something create picture clear! not giant picture with blurry face!

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-07 10:20
  • HIfi

> In reply to 1 @ 2013-09-06 22:45 from 3sEp - click to readAre you blind or just didn't read the review? There's NOT a single benchmark where the Note 3 doesn't beat Z Ultra. Embarassing! Lol

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-07 08:25
  • XMFa

Samsung ..how come you forget apple's new Apple EarPods case, please check (it's cool and useful as well )and include in your box !!!

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-07 07:35
  • UNVN

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-09-06 23:57 from jAG} - click to readTell me usefull feature on smartphone..smartphone sucks,
battery problem,small screen,when a matter is too tight,,,even on facebook chatting like a quarrel,i throw my note 2 and shifts to my desktop..because my experience is smartphone can never be used as a full fledged internet devices.

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-07 04:39
  • utxi

not impressed the LG G2 camera and sony z1 million times better

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-07 01:16
  • 43xf

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.