News - Reader comments

Samsung to add 64-bit CPUs to its 2014 flagships

12 September, 2013 | Read the news | Post your comment
Samsung to add 64-bit CPUs to its 2014 flagships - read the full textSamsung's CEO JK Shin announced the company will start using 64-bit processors on its "next smartphones". This most probably means the 2014 flagships, such as the Galaxy S5, will be getting the new processors. This announcement follows hot on the heels of Apple's recent event that brought us...

 

Sort by:

> In reply to Bhushan @ 2013-10-01 20:59 from 7wAt - click to read@ Buhsahn, you can't fail with a Note 3 seems to me.. Best available atm

  • Reply
  • 2013-10-26 10:10
  • mng6

Dear true, if u read d article without bias u will c it sez dat bigger ram requires 64bit,hence, tinst copying wen its a requirement... N as hopefully u can c phone rams r jes reaching sed rammage

  • Reply
  • 2013-10-11 09:52
  • NugV

> In reply to Bhushan @ 2013-10-01 20:59 from 7wAt - click to readOut of those choices I would say Note 3. It's the most you can get atm. But that does not mean it's your preference. The Z1 is pretty awesome too. And if you are so die hard you could wait I guess, but you would be waiting for around half a year to a year. Or you could get something now and then trade in if you feel it's worth it.

  • Reply
  • 2013-10-02 05:41
  • 4QSR

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-09-22 22:44 from 4QSR - click to readShould I wait for 64-bit CPU based phone from Samsung or buy a Samsung Note-3/ Sony Xperia Z1? Please suggest.

  • Reply
  • 2013-10-01 20:59
  • 7wAt

Sammy why the hell r u copying???
really apple is the king of innovations!
somene has truely said when peoples were criticizing iphone 5s that "wait for sammy and sony to copy it for u at lower prices. They only know to copy and make some gimmick features which r of no use!"
iphone 5s has new features that are equally useful enogh!
salute to apple!!!
(i hv a sgs4 also which is the worst phone ever.it heat up like hell!

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-24 20:14
  • 9Ctk

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-09-13 07:33 from UixJ - click to readFirst of all dear troll. Retina is not display type. It's a pixel density. Amoled is a type of display and can be retina and is retina in the last few models. Almost all phones since 720p screens and all since 1080p screens are retina.
Dear apple was not even the first to use Retina. Sony was. All the way back in 08 or 09 with the Xperia X1.

Second of all to say Amoled is unnatural for saturated colors you would have to say LCD is unnatural due to lack of blacks and contrast. While Amoled is the only screen capable of true blacks and best contrast.
The difference is Amoled's colors can be tuned and since the Note2/S4 movie mode has given near perfect color accuracy while still retaining contrast and black. Making it overall the most realistic screen. While previous models still had good color accuracy while still as well retaining their true blacks and contrast. Just not as near perfect. Overall good enough for most though.
So Amoled can do saturated and natural both better...It also is getting more proper white balances. Also always getting closer to 100% accurate colors. All the while having a plethora of flexibility and advantages over LCD. Like being thinner, overall less power consuming, less reflective, completely even lighting, faster response times, and the bigger the displays get the more and more you notice the advantages of Amoled.

Not to mention generally most people like it being saturated anyway. It's usually fanboys, online trolls, and haters that complain about it. In fact nobody in person has ever complained to me about about the colors or that it's "fake". They like it. And for those that care so bad or rare few that need it there is a setting to fix it that in fact makes it overall more natural than LCD. So there is no real complaint. Just hating trolls.
Especially when you consider if you go back a couple years for LCD. LG's 600nit Nova display was considered outstandingly bright then and most LCD's generally were actually under accurate.

So....You really have no clue.

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-22 22:44
  • 4QSR

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-09-16 06:56 from UixJ - click to readThe galaxy is the brick when it's rounded and ergonomic while others literally are bricks.....Sounds like jealousy

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-16 08:01
  • 4QSR

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-09-16 06:52 from UixJ - click to readLmao! First off ....NOT EVEN RELATED! They were correcting misinforming trolling.

Second...You obviously don't understand Amoled or know how it's advanced.

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-16 08:00
  • 4QSR

> In reply to ALTAF'S @ 2013-09-13 10:43 from 7j@Q - click to readS3 & S4 look bulky brick ! have issue when putting in pocket

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-16 06:56
  • UixJ

> In reply to Tom-Helge @ 2013-09-13 12:44 from HFqR - click to readhow pathetic you are , until now AMOLED screen still looks over exposure with unbalance color saturation. you feel your own once you have iphone 5 & S4 in your hand

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-16 06:52
  • UixJ

> In reply to Recklesslife @ 2013-09-13 13:58 from nF96 - click to readyeah glass bricks and tin boxes....

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-15 22:27
  • 4QSR

Unless Google has release a 64 bit is. There's no way that the jellybean would be the base cause it's now becoming an old OS because of having the same UI without any changes to the coding so that it won't lag even if you had only 10% memory space or lags when your using a web browser on a heavy intense image sites.

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-14 14:01
  • thcx

> In reply to Xiaomi @ 2013-09-13 20:26 from mi7X - click to readBack to reality...IOS no lag? LMFAO!

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-14 08:21
  • 4QSR

> In reply to hahaha @ 2013-09-13 04:52 from v0Xd - click to readOh yeah...It's "superior" speed...Because it can open apps .00001 seconds faster because it's a glorified app launcher....Wooooooooo.

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-14 08:15
  • 4QSR

From a well respected iOS developer:

"This isn't how background tasks work in iOS. When the app goes to suspend, unless it is doing an authorized background process there is a very very very short window where it is resident before its save state is written and it is unloaded. That has nothing to do with available memory and everything to do with apple's "backgrounding" process. Even if you JUST TURNED the phone on, ran the app, closed it and loaded another app that used almost no memory, after a relatively short time when you go to open the first app it will load from save state. On top of that it all depends on how the author loads the app (i.e. if they actually check for resume or if they just load fresh every time).

I honestly feel, as a developer and a geek, that apple's system is incredibly well engineered and actually does multi-tasking how 95% of users expect to do multi-tasking. The problem with it is that people simply assume it works like their PC does.

You really can't and don't "run out of ram" or "use all 1GB" of your iPhone. Each app loading in to its sandbox and being programmed against ARC usually means that you will either have enough RAM, or your app will break. Not much of an in between there.

As for development as it exists, I'm not saying users wouldn't benefit from 2GB (now or eventually) but outside of bleeding edge games/apps I really don't know a whole ton of devs who are slamming head first into 1GB. Most of the cries for 2GB comes from users who don't have any clue of resource management on the phone and just assume that because the app is laggy or their app is resuming save state and has to load that an extra 1GB will fix all of that. And most of the time... It won't."

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-13 21:04
  • 0CDJ

> In reply to Tom-Helge @ 2013-09-13 03:58 from HFqR - click to readWhat point of having that much ram if those rams are SLOW? Apple may have only 1 GB ram but they saw themselves, that on IOS there is no need for more ram, everything is running with no lag or ram deficite. And this one gig of ram is designed to be way faster than 2 or 3 gigs on android.

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-13 20:26
  • mi7X

jeezz dude! just calm down, im not an apple or samsung fan boy either, O_x , just expressing my point of view on both OEM's so don't troll oke?? Im currently using Xperia Z right now so im not bias to apple or samsung OEM's.

"THIS IS TO ALL PEOPLE WHO TWERK ON MY COMMENT HEHEHE" :))

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-13 18:04
  • uSNU

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-09-13 17:07 from 3dv5 - click to readActually it was AMD who commercialized 64bit in the early 2000s, 64bit was developed to address more memory. Samsung made a good choice by not releasing it because it's not essential until 4GB mobile ram modules are feasible.

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-13 17:28
  • 3iJC

> In reply to coldsync @ 2013-09-13 16:26 from xv7a - click to readExactly and in order to take advantage of 4gm ram you must have 64bit OS however iphone has only 1gb ram so no advantage is taken as it's limited by RAM

  • Reply
  • 2013-09-13 17:23
  • 3iJC

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.