News - Reader comments

Nokia announces Nokia 6260 slide feature phone, writes S40 history

Nokia announces Nokia 6260 slide feature phone, writes S40 history - read the full textThe spanking new Nokia 6260 slide easily steals the spotlight with Wi-Fi, GPS, 320 x 480 pixels display, and a 5 megapixel camera with Carl Zeiss optics. We bet that reading those specs the words "dumb phone" or "S40" would never cross you mind. But the new...

 

Is it just me or the leading phone companies have run out of design ideas? Man, they all look the same... people are getting tired of the same age old designs...

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-25 17:39
  • G2GS

hmmm loving the press shots with youtube loaded on the browser ,then the next shot with m.youtube.com loaded
surely thats a difference between S60 and S40 haha

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-25 17:12
  • S35r

What is the 360 degree d-pad?

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-25 17:11
  • M@Ti

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-11-25 16:08 from uWxwyou know why nokia don't wanna use window??

when use window os means selling the phone to Microsoft

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-25 17:10
  • wc6i

> In reply to Rici @ 2008-11-25 16:14 from w98Athe screen k850 doesn't have 320x480 RESOLUTION BUT 240X320,

AND THE SCREEN color of k850 is 256K NOT 16M

K850 CANNOT record VGA(640X480) BUT QVGA(240X320)

k850/all SONY ERICSSON 5MP camera quality already worst enough, don't even compare it to NOKIA 5MP phone

k850 don't have FLASH LITE V3

K850 CANNOT TV-out

K850 CANNOT play WMV

K850 don't have 360 D-PAD

K850 equip a v2 bluetooth not V2.1

k850 don't have Carzl zEISS Optic n tESSAR LENS

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-25 17:07
  • wc6i

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-11-25 16:08 from uWxwshut up, it will cost around 300 euro or 350 usd

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-25 16:58
  • mygt

I love this phone!!!!!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-25 16:57
  • pTKC

> In reply to Rici @ 2008-11-25 16:14 from w98A240X320 256K 2.2"

COMPARE to 320x480 16M 2.4"

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-25 16:55
  • wc6i

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-11-25 16:08 from uWxwWindows Mobile OS is hell not better than S40 even. That useless OS is pathetic. Sony Ericsson only ever used it once and Nokia never used Windows OS.
Manufacturers keep needing to customize the cheap Windows Mobile OS because it looks so bad.
Mobiles with amazing screens cant even make the Windows OS look good. In fact it looks bad on large detailed screens because you can see the pixels. How cheap is that? You can see the pixels on a mobile. Pretty lame.

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-25 16:22
  • S9V8

Go for the SE k850, its has got everything here plus Xenon flash, Accelerometer.

Forget GPS and Wifi, the battery is too weak to hold them for even 15 mins !!!

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-25 16:14
  • w98A

The one thing that annoys me with Nokia is the build quality I still have the 1st original nokia on orange and its build quality is far superior to any phones they produce now. Please Nokia sort this out

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-25 16:08
  • MZ8N

S40 is such a bad platform... really dont mind,,,,,, symbian is far far better than S40
this mobile is not gonna be success may be... but nokia seems like releasing it at 600-700 US $
which is worse price for such a fone...
HTC fones with better features and far better WINDOWS OS are already available in market with VGA display, low weight and superior performence (600 Mhz) @ 450$-500$

Sony Ericsson Xperia which is already in stores at about 750 - 800 US $ which is far far far more superior

HTC advantage @ 950 USD

HTCtOUCH PRO AT 700 USD

HTC Shift @ 1300 USD

Motorola ZN5 at just 320 USD is a better fone than this one... beats it even if it is available @ 500 USD

So dear nokia sorry for the CRAP.... I hate u... because you have announced an INSANE FONE


these are real high end fones

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-25 16:08
  • uWxw

That's the phone I was waiting for! Surely my next phone. Long live the S40!

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-25 15:42
  • Tr$T

the first feature phone to "sport" the awesome Nokia WebKit Open Source Browser

Support? Sport?

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-25 15:12
  • t@E9

> In reply to Onslow @ 2008-11-25 11:53 from MZ8NThe guy's right
They're not gonna make the perfect phone 4 u because then everyone will have wat they want and they'll be out of business because nobody wants a phone thats not wat they want unless they produce a phone with entirely new features

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-25 14:58
  • S9V8

Omg, it's iphone copy... hahahaaa.... just kidding!

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-25 14:57
  • n7j$

This is a welcome addition to the S40 range and could be an indicator that Nokia is very likely over the longer term to seriously consider that as the similarities between S60 and S40 become greater and the differences less, that S40 could become integrated into an overall smartphone OS powering Nokia's entire range.

As far as this device is concerned, it faces its most direct challenge from the 6220 Classic which includes the S60 OS.

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-25 14:51
  • MAgW

just to give you an idea of how much pixels that is....the iphone is also HVGA but in 3.5", and this is crammed into 2.4"
meaning really high picture quality!!

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-25 14:48
  • kWPc

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-11-25 12:16 from uWxwBetter OS? Windows Mobile? You're kidding, right? Having windows on your PC is bad enough... I can't understand why anyone would want it running their phone.

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-25 14:35
  • PYUf

Good Job Nokia ! (^_^) Way the go ! Not regret to be the one of Nokia fans!

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-25 14:30
  • PS6b

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.