News - Reader comments

New Samsung midranger leaks out of China's TENAA

20 November, 2013 | Read the news | Post your comment
New Samsung midranger leaks out of China's TENAA - read the full textChina's TENAA certification agency has taken a few shots of an upcoming midrange Samsung device with a model number SM-G7106. Although only dual-SIM support has been confirmed out of TENAA, sources say that the upcoming device will run on Android 4.3 Jelly Bean, and feature a quad-core...


Sort by:

hi..please send to me rom ..i have difficult rom..need rom 4.4.2 for G7106

  • Reply
  • 2015-01-03 13:05
  • B{Cj

> In reply to rajan @ 2013-11-22 08:20 from vGWq - click to readi agree :)

  • Reply
  • 2013-11-22 17:47
  • rJ92

Samsung, why dont u change ur design, from high end to low end all are same..........

  • Reply
  • 2013-11-22 08:20
  • vGWq

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-11-22 02:36 from 9Lax - click to readWell thats a single hiccup I guess... I don't remember any other instance...
BTW - before you say - I am not a Sammy boy, I am pretty happy with my Optimus G Pro ;-). Actually sold of my SIII due to pathetic after sales support in India...
But you must admit that they are much faster compared to other manufacturers when it comes to OS updates.

  • Reply
  • 2013-11-22 06:26
  • vG7x

> In reply to basushaunak @ 2013-11-21 09:38 from vG7S - click to readAh yes,OS Updates like the one they rolled out in the U.K.? You know the 4.3 update that basically rendered thousands of mobile phones useless :)

  • Reply
  • 2013-11-22 02:36
  • 9Lax

> In reply to Shutup @ 2013-11-20 20:14 from KIAY - click to readSamsung makes millions of different phones but apple makes 1 in 1 year... and whats the difference ?? nothing :) Its just popular because it's an American product .... thats it :)

Also, the specifications of apple will never be close to Samsung's phone specifications

  • Reply
  • 2013-11-21 21:11
  • Ibxy

another samsung phone and more complains. but at the end of the day samsung still sells more. come on people this is 2013 what matters in a phone is functionality,personalization and easy of use. that is where samsung dominates.old design with functionality vs good design(htc,sony,nokia) but with less options i will always choose the first and that's what the majority will choose.whether u are a samsung fan or apple fan who cares, in this era the consummer is king. i personally prefer htc phones but i have to admit samsung makes overall the best phones.

  • Reply
  • 2013-11-21 20:12
  • N7IJ

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-11-21 16:32 from 0a0X - click to readwhat sales budget are you talking about, and where did you even get that information.. Micromax toppled every other company in india to reach the second position, in terms of market share.. samsung's sales are better in every segment compared to other manufacturers.. I'm not biased towards samsung, but something has to be seriously right with their products, to push their sales upward.. customers aren't fools you know..

polycarbonate are used in a variety of cars and also crash helmets.. the implications are fairly understandable I presume.. and for the gold, silver bit, you probably didn't understand what I meant..

  • Reply
  • 2013-11-21 17:42
  • u7Yh

1.2 ghz quad core device?
mtk proccesor i think

  • Reply
  • 2013-11-21 16:42
  • 61QF

> In reply to Monk @ 2013-11-21 14:07 from u7Y2 - click to readSamsung also has a MUCH larger marketing budget than anyone else, releases more phone spam than anyone else (see topic of this very article), and is available in more markets than anyone else. No surprise they have more sales, which, according to Samsung, are made up alot more from low to mid range phones than high end ones. They also project growth to be higher in those segments than in the high end too.

F1 cars? Last time I checked they were using carbon fiber, not polycarbonate, and meant to be driven, not held. Either way weight and aero is the most important thing for those cars, not looks. Gold, silver, platinum? Bring it back to reality. Those would make the devices cost prohibitive.

  • Reply
  • 2013-11-21 16:32
  • 0a0X

I cannot understand why most of the new offerings are large screen displays. For me, 4.3 inch is more than enough on a phone. That is opinion based. Can't say I like the design though...all samsungs look the same to me. Prefer square phones like the lumias.

  • Reply
  • 2013-11-21 14:36
  • 0mwb

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-11-21 13:36 from 0a0X - click to readYet samsung outsells all these brands.. the reason is at some point people realize that features, functionality and support, surpasses the design factor.. anyway, the material used in samsung devices is the same used in F1 cars..(can check it if u want).. and since when did aluminium become a premium metal.. last I heard it was gold, silver or platinum.. so comeback when all the brands you mentioned comes up with a gold or silver made phone..

  • Reply
  • 2013-11-21 14:07
  • u7Y2

> In reply to 9oo ooo ooo @ 2013-11-21 08:10 from pE3U - click to readWhy do you guys always bring up and are thinking about Apple? So what you're saying is that Samsung shouldn't improve unless Apple changes something? My point is, why do you all think Samsung shouldn't do anything unless they are reacting to apple. At least Apple, HTC, and Sony have won praise for their flagship design. Can't say the same for Samsung. The first thing most reviewers point out when reviewing the design and build is how much it is below that of other OEMs.

  • Reply
  • 2013-11-21 13:36
  • 0a0X

Its similar to Grand Duos but I dont think that its a grand's new model bcz its model number is way too different from Grand model number like the first Grand model with single sim was i9080 n the other with dual sim was i9082

and for the people who keep commenting that why samsung is not changing its shape n design ? I think the proper answer is bcz Samsung n IPhone has its own value n standard in market by their shapes n design which they r not changing. Like BlackBerry also do so they dont need to change it :)

and if u really need different type of design ?? U should go to other brand !! simple :)

  • Reply
  • 2013-11-21 11:49
  • 8jpX

definitely galaxy grand 2

  • Reply
  • 2013-11-21 11:34
  • U$4j

i think it's a copy i9082 Grand

  • Reply
  • 2013-11-21 11:29
  • 3yTY

SIII plus is that you??

  • Reply
  • 2013-11-21 11:08
  • vphe

Wow, what a revolutionary fresh design, Very radical, I bet no-one expected Samsung to be this innovative on the design front!

  • Reply
  • 2013-11-21 11:01
  • Kg%u

> In reply to abhilashes @ 2013-11-21 07:57 from tUh@ - click to readI just guessed because it is said its a midranger

  • Reply
  • 2013-11-21 10:08
  • sSKj

> In reply to 9oo ooo ooo @ 2013-11-21 08:10 from pE3U - click to readWell may be 2007-ish or 1907-ish design. But one thing is for sure, in spite of so much bruhaha in the forums - the people who matter (i.e. the buyers) don't seem to mind the dated design.
And as an intelligent company Sammy is really not interested to change the design as long as their sell do not drop. They are probably busy investing that money elsewhere - like being the first to provide OS updates... ????

  • Reply
  • 2013-11-21 09:38
  • vG7S

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.