News - Reader comments

Samsung starts manufacturing LCD-based Galaxy Note 3 Lite

12 December, 2013 | Read the news | Post your comment
Samsung starts manufacturing LCD-based Galaxy Note 3 Lite - read the full textThere were rumors that Samsung is looking at LCD screens to cut costs for the next Galaxy S and Note flagships, but maybe they were only partially correct. New information from Korean publication ETNews suggests Samsung is already making the Galaxy Note 3 Lite, which is the actual LCD-packing Note...


Sort by:

How price of the device

  • Reply
  • 2014-01-01 11:37
  • pc3S


  • Reply
  • 2014-01-01 11:06
  • XNtq

great news but i dont think the price is going to drop too much if they keep the same internals. Oh who knows but if it does better for us ofcourse

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-15 00:56
  • TmCa


  • Reply
  • 2013-12-14 21:55
  • q9av

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-12-13 10:18 from 4QSR - click to readThis is a very good news.

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-14 14:10
  • t}F{

don"t for down your quality

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-14 03:50
  • IV$N

more ch0ice for consumer every time

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-13 21:07
  • HLx4

Even micromax like companies using crap ips lcd (some unit is warm other is cold).

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-13 18:41
  • vQ%F

Perhaps they're not actually creating a Note 3 Lite, which could arguably dilute the Note brand, but rather a Note 3 Active (slightly lower spec, but water proof).

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-13 18:15
  • nv1s

I love my Xperia Pro, I miss phone with keypad. It makes typing so easier.

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-13 13:12
  • ijya

This is actually very accurate. Despite it's humor and crude point.

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-13 10:35
  • 4QSR

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-12-13 06:25 from PIW1 - click to readSteve Jobs openly admits to shamelessly stealing.
He made his own daughter live on Welfare and would not claim her til she was older...Said he wanted her to learn.

Apple shamelessly stole the name Ipad and Iphone from existing devices.
They took the design from the LG Prada
They used nearly identical chips to Samsung's architecture.
In the UK after they finally lost the battle over ipad and galaxy tab they had to post on their site samsung did not copy.
Then apple tried again and had to do the same and compensate. They claimed 2 weeks was not enough time to add a link. Then made it in a non complying way and had to be reinforced by the courts to adhere to the court ruling.

They used photo shopped evidence in us and uk courts pertaining to iphone and ipad.
They barely designed IOS and they copied the iphone design then bought and stole the rest.

There is the small glimpse of truth.

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-13 10:18
  • 4QSR

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-12-13 06:25 from PIW1 - click to readNow I'm being a sour grape that's bashing for stating the truth????

And your point is? The majority of popular music now a days that is played all over the place and loved by the majority of general public is over used, rip off, barely can carry a tune without auto tune, heartless music....But it's generally the most popular, known, and sells like hot cakes...Does not mean that it's the best or most original.

What I said was just facts. I did not even down talk them. Just pointed out what really happened.

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-13 09:56
  • 4QSR

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-12-13 06:19 from PIW1 - click to readPutting words in my mouth then making up crap....Good job

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-13 09:50
  • 4QSR

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-12-13 03:05 from 4QSR - click to readcreate your own company and beat apple,no point sitting there bash a successful company and make yourself looks like sour grape.
there are no company from consumer electronics in this world has more cash reserve than Apple (100 billions),copy doesn't lead u this far.

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-13 06:25
  • PIW1

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-12-13 03:06 from 4QSR - click to readoh,u mean we should judge a technology by just looking at how new is it(skin deep boy),and we should be proud of our flagship model looking similar to your most obvious competitor. yea typical fanboy comment

i have an s4,i hate how the over saturated color makes my eyes sore,and its not bright,even the new one.Natural color mode looks washout

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-13 06:19
  • PIW1

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-12-12 16:33 from PIW1 - click to readSo you hate a superior technology and think gold version is an iphone thing.....Wow some of you trolls are really naive.

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-13 03:06
  • 4QSR

> In reply to TheNeighbor @ 2013-12-12 23:27 from v0qJ - click to readNot really. If you want a more accurate video of the original Iphone watch the Mad TV version. As sad and funny as it is it actually hits the spot.

It was not that revolutionary, nothing original, a combination of endless copied, stolen, and bought technology....and just more advanced to the general public...People who actually understands phones and already had smart phones knew that smartphones were well in that direction. Apple just jumped on the bandwagon and robbed and amazed. There was plenty of much better and functional phones even then. Even touch wise it was not first or outstanding or leader.....

Just that horrible company and that low life jobs was able to fool people.

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-13 03:05
  • 4QSR

> In reply to Pretoria East @ 2013-12-12 17:54 from f0bw - click to readWow.. you are so proud of your HTC using LCD since 2010? Common.. LCD is inferior to SuperAmoled, and Samsung is only using LCD on low to mid end model.. All Samsung Flagship are using SuperAmoled which is far more superior... Sorry if I offended you with your Godlike HTC LCD..

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-13 02:40
  • TC{C

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.