News - Reader comments

Samsung loses court battle with Apple in Korea

12 December, 2013 | Read the news | Post your comment
Samsung loses court battle with Apple in Korea - read the full textRecently, Apple brought Samsung to court in the US alleging patent infringement and it ruled in its favor. After the loss abroad, Samsung experienced another loss on home turf - this time in a suit the Korean company itself has filed. Filed in late 2011, the lawsuit alleged Apple had infringed...

 

Sort by:

> In reply to My Opinion @ 2013-12-12 21:04 from LaTB - click to readWhat difference does it make if the Judge is an iPhone user?

Do you remember the court case where a Judge ruled in Samsungs favour, then shortly after joined them?

That's much more fishy.

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-12 21:27
  • nEUd

Bouncing back patent? Are you fucking kidding me? Go make a patent for scrolling up/down since it's the way in today's world. These kind of bs deserve to go bankrupt.

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-12 21:26
  • dMKX

"Apple, of course, sees it differently: "We are glad the Korean court joined others around the world in standing up for real innovation and rejecting Samsung's ridiculous claims," said Steve Park, spokesman for Apple Korea."

Keyword: Ridiculous.

LOL. Nice words Apple.

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-12 21:26
  • j8wI

Both companies are crap.

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-12 21:21
  • YQ@@

And then you ask: "why apple keep doing the same devices???" Because spend a lot of time trying pull down samsung, while could make something amazing for the own consumers...

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-12 21:12
  • 3SWK

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-12-12 19:52 from Ibxj - click to readThere are different patents in question, the american case is mostly that old galaxy s series phones look like I phones (a bit, from a distance, if you squint) and that apple were apparently allowed to patent a rectangle with rounded corners. Whereas the Korea case is about SMS technology and display. Both courts have decided in apples favour but about different issues. The reason The American case is seen as unjust is because the judge is an iPhone user and is therefore not impartial and objective. And when you're deciding which company has to pay the other BILLIONS of dollars an objective, impartial look at the evidence is the only fair way.

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-12 21:04
  • LaTB
  • The Boy with Red Hat
  • Report
  • Rating1

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-12-12 20:32 from J5sX - click to readAlso Samsung crappy plastic

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-12 21:01
  • 9BcM

Samsung forget that Korea doesnt have sCourts like US have iCourts

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-12 20:33
  • 3YeA

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-12-12 19:54 from Ibxj - click to readiphone is crap

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-12 20:32
  • J5sX

The truth hurts...

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-12 19:54
  • Ibxj

Where are the Samsung trolls?????

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-12 19:54
  • Ibxj

> In reply to samsung rules @ 2013-12-12 17:42 from 07Bh - click to readDon't understand this reply, if in Apple's home country the decision is the same as in Samsung's home country then how is it that Apple's home country isn't fair or equal??? The two countries have the same verdict and decision so the two must be equal and fair together. No country is biased in this matter. Correct me if I'm wrong.

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-12 19:52
  • Ibxj

"We are glad the Korean court joined others around the world in standing up for real innovation and rejecting Samsung's ridiculous claims,"
That Statement, I want to kill them. Want all of these patent wars to go away though. It hold back from the development of the industry.

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-12 19:31
  • PEHx

Samsung provides us with choices

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-12 18:53
  • v0Xt

stupid companies fighting like cats and dogs

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-12 18:39
  • t}Uh

apple iphone icons look 3d and bubblylike android the way u hold the centre button to slide the screens upwards to get rid of them is a windows feature apple have ran out of ideas. samsung has a better camera its free running no sill itunes, you all buy iphones for the pants logo and name even apple he name was stolen from a mexico company :)

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-12 18:08
  • 3AxW

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-12-12 17:35 from v0qJ - click to readThey have to be unite. May this be something which can workout..!!

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-12 17:58
  • PN9B

I'm not sure about the true story, but as far as I know, Samsung blatantly tried to copy iPhone's hardware design, UI, icons etc. It's clearly evident from the cheap phones Samsung keep dishing out. What an utter shameful and disgraceful act by Samsung!

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-12 17:51
  • 95qs

hahahahahahhaahah shamsung! apple rules!

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-12 17:44
  • 9579

> In reply to samsung rules @ 2013-12-12 17:42 from 07Bh - click to readJustice can always be bought out

  • Reply
  • 2013-12-12 17:44
  • Rg5R

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.