News - Reader comments

Ruggedized Samsung B2100 leaks, we can't wait to torture it

Ruggedized Samsung B2100 leaks, we can't wait to torture it - read the full textWith the MWC in Barcelona just around the corner we got a glimpse of another phone that will probably be introduced there. The Samsung B2100 looks like a trimmed-down sturdier version of the B2700, which we reviewed/stress-tested a while ago. The Samsung B2100 looks very similar to the Samsung...

 

Sort by:

b2100 is one of the best . for those people love nokia forget it. samsung is coming to town like santa =)

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-22 17:27
  • t7Nf

Served me well for my outdoor extreme lifestyle, but i got angry 1 day and threw it against the wall and the thing shattered into a thousand pieces. definitely NOT indestructable...

  • Reply
  • 2010-01-04 19:59
  • fj5f

Just got this phone, and it's the best rugged tough phone I've ever had. I've had Nokias 5410 & 5500 sport, and even JCB phone. And this one is by far the best. Fastest menu system I've ever used on a phone. Some may see it as basic features, but there's more than enough there, just because people will compare this to smartphones, which you shouldn't. It's a tough phone, and it does tough very very well! 10/10 I'd give this (and that doesn't happen often with a phone for me!

  • Reply
  • 2009-11-12 12:02
  • nE{6

this also bears the IP57 certification test.which also sonim xp3 enduro.it means that they are equal in toughness.but the price of xp3 is very high and their is no other features in sonim xp3 without ruggedness.while it have also good specification as 1.3 mp camera with auto focus.fm radio and card slot also.and above the all low price tag.

  • Reply
  • 2009-03-15 19:26
  • uWxU

I guess Sonim XP3 is tougher...

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-30 21:53
  • PEGg

> In reply to jonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn @ 2009-01-29 16:13 from nE6Y - click to readWell said...

Im the same i sell loads of M110's builders and tradesmen love them!!!

Also the B2700 = great seller ,.... 110-120 GBP.... bargin!!!

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-30 15:51
  • SbDP

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-01-30 03:32 from inyR - click to readwill you blend?

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-30 06:15
  • ijDg

but will it blend?

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-30 03:32
  • inyR

> In reply to Matej @ 2009-01-29 15:03 from prMY - click to readcorrection, they had a water RESISTANT phone, not waterproof.. nothing can be claimed to be waterproof.. there's been several on the market from nokia, sony, sonim.. the one thing phone companies need to realise is that a phone doesn't have to be basic to be rugged.. they could easily do a 3G/3.5G model without the foward facing camera and hsdpa and it would SELL.. sturdy doesn't have to be basic, give us who need a tough phone better options, 2G network is LAME, not every tradesman woks in metropolitan areas, give us 850umts in a tough shell, how hard can it be?

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-30 02:09
  • yVgU

> In reply to vinsoy @ 2009-01-29 07:42 from P@1W - click to readnokia, siemens, and ericsson had their ruggedized phones since long long time ago.
please do some research before making stupid comments

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-30 02:08
  • Mtyp

no 3G? no thanks, i prefer Samsung B2700.

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-30 01:48
  • tDA$

DS phon had bricks on it an water an sand ans still OK. THe bestt of all ever. mayjor hard. Bash it no wrries, smash also ok for it. dunno bout bang.

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-29 18:05
  • M3s@

I am a builder.

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-29 18:02
  • M3s@
  • jonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
  • Report
  • Rating0

I Think some of these posters need to get a life. I will be selling hunderds of these. people who work on building sites want a phone they can drop and use. not something with a 45 megapixel camrea that stops working when it gets a bit chilly.

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-29 16:13
  • nE6Y

> In reply to vinsoy @ 2009-01-29 07:42 from P@1W - click to readI'm sorry bu i think nokia had waterproof mobile a long time ago...
But it hadn't have the display in colour.

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-29 15:03
  • prMY

You don't need to be pretty for the things this phone is supposed to do.

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-29 11:22
  • QI%c

hey..im Rameez and im one of the most early posters!!!

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-29 08:42
  • u1t9

its only a matter of time, Nokia will imitate Samsungs water proof design... tsk tsk tsk.. Nokia copycats!

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-29 07:42
  • P@1W

its about time samsung made a durable phone that wont break in my pocket when im walking around with my cellphone or forget to take my phone out of my pocket when im bboyin whens the release date i want one NAOW!! : D

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-29 05:33
  • iS5b

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-01-29 00:37 from yVgU - click to readcouldnt have said it better - trady tool not fashion piece you ignorant bleeting goat, 'ugly' means nought to this type of phone

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-29 04:55
  • ijDg

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.