News - Reader comments

AT&T Galaxy S5 camera image leaks on Flickr

18 February, 2014 | Read the news | Post your comment
AT&T Galaxy S5 camera image leaks on Flickr - read the full textSamsung will be officially announcing the upcoming Galaxy S5 smartphone at their next Unpacked event next week but until then we have another blurry image from the camera to check out. The image was posted on Flickr and tweeted by evleaks and is allegedly from the AT&T variant of the phone. The...

 

Sort by:

can be 16MP or 20MP but if the sensor phisical size is the same the photo will suck as an 8MP photo

the 41MP from Nokia is another thing because it has a larger phisical size so more information(light) is on sensor meaning more quality of the photo

  • Reply
  • 2014-02-19 00:21
  • ajPD

Gone is time when leaks were real, Now its just part of marketing strategy. ok Samsung we got the message.

  • Reply
  • 2014-02-18 17:31
  • M7YA

what i can determine by this picture is that it f out when placed very closely to objects.

  • Reply
  • 2014-02-18 16:51
  • Nvme

go to get the s5

  • Reply
  • 2014-02-18 16:28
  • fuwx

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2014-02-18 12:40 from PBTX - click to readyou never said a truer word folk.

  • Reply
  • 2014-02-18 16:24
  • rrfV

No one gives a flying feck. I dont.

  • Reply
  • 2014-02-18 15:44
  • D8XA

The picture is so yuckz.. It can't match Lumia 1020, Nokia 808 Pureview.

  • Reply
  • 2014-02-18 14:48
  • t@y2

Lol, so the next samsung flagship produces very bad image quality as we can see here.

  • Reply
  • 2014-02-18 13:58
  • IWMN

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2014-02-18 12:40 from PBTX - click to readHe's saying Sony against Android so it's mortal to mortal fight.
But if it's Samsung vs Apple then thats what u call mortal vs iGod.

  • Reply
  • 2014-02-18 12:53
  • K7ev

> In reply to geordie81 @ 2014-02-18 11:57 from L2Yr - click to readTruth is, there was nothing really wrong with SGS4 in terms of specs. It's just that the SGS4 was well.. um.. boring. This unfortunately was the result of their designers having to design something on their own, after the Apple copycat debacle.

  • Reply
  • 2014-02-18 12:44
  • Tr3N

In the Android world, Samsung was lucky to be in the right place at the right time. The Galaxy series had no real rivals, and it created a halo effect which is still apparent to this day.

However, the last year rivals have caught up with better products, while Samsung have stagnated. People are becoming aware, but it will still take some time. Samsung will feel the pain for real this year as the SGS4 was a disaster.

  • Reply
  • 2014-02-18 12:41
  • Tr3N

> In reply to Abaddon-ISJ5 @ 2014-02-18 12:29 from UNAe - click to readWhy?i just don't understand people these day.i mean come on if u want to compare something vs samsung, it like a mere mortal try to boxing with god.

  • Reply
  • 2014-02-18 12:40
  • PBTX

Apart from no focus, the image is noiseless and detailed. Nice.

  • Reply
  • 2014-02-18 12:37
  • nX%G

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2014-02-18 12:11 from PUsP - click to readActually, only Sony Takes my choice when I choose an Android phones.

  • Reply
  • 2014-02-18 12:29
  • UNAe

I have no doubt Sammy's goal in 2014 is not to have a repeat of 2013 with the GS4...they want the S5 to be the #1 device. The Question is will HTC, LG, Sony and even Moto-Lenovo let them. Other players like Oppo, Huawei, Xiomi etc might also deliver a surprise.

  • Reply
  • 2014-02-18 12:20
  • TfjR

So samsung bitter rival this year is sony?i don't get why people like to compare samsung with sony.sony 's a big android player now?

  • Reply
  • 2014-02-18 12:11
  • PUsP

I did mot think that the s4 camera was to bad, but it was poor in low light, and the comoetition since the s4 release have mostly vastly improved their cameras, i hope this new beast will have MUCH better low light skills, how about being able to control the shutter speed as well, also when is google implementing RAW standard in their update, i heard they was looking to put it on one of the next major updates. Need much more settings from the camera then

  • Reply
  • 2014-02-18 11:57
  • L2Yr

wtf photo quality??

  • Reply
  • 2014-02-18 11:45
  • AL}M

Very Nice and Exelent Quality. lol

  • Reply
  • 2014-02-18 10:59
  • HFiP

> In reply to Gelvin - Maximus @ 2014-02-18 10:36 from sSxY - click to readAs we expected :)

  • Reply
  • 2014-02-18 10:54
  • UNAe

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.