News - Reader comments

Galaxy S5's ISOCELL camera advantages demoed on video

12 March, 2014 | Read the news | Post your comment
Galaxy S5's ISOCELL camera advantages demoed on video - read the full textSamsung has been working on its ISOCELL tech for a while now and the new camera technology is ready for primetime it's used in the main camera of the Samsung Galaxy S5, which is bound to sell in the tens of millions. What's ISOCELL anyway? It turns out, individual pixels are in actual...

 

Sort by:

> In reply to bakzh0 @ 2014-03-15 04:44 from y$61 - click to readYou mean winner of benchmarks? Samsung.
Even the GSM articles state Samsung was not the only to do that. And they stopped. While others are still doing it. And even without it they still topped benchmarks....So????
Like others lying about screens? There is not really even a fix for that. Or making one of the biggest scams in phone history and getting away with it ever year???
Or fake camera commercials? Or ceo's publicly and rudely bashing others out of spite and jealousy?

How about learn some things about the related technology and hard facts before posting here?

  • Reply
  • 2014-03-16 13:36
  • 4QSR

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2014-03-14 09:03 from 4QSR - click to readyou forgot who's the winner of benchmark cheater?

  • Reply
  • 2014-03-15 04:44
  • y$61

> In reply to 2014: Z2 vs New One @ 2014-03-13 14:49 from 6w@C - click to readAdvertising sure...Cheating? That would be apple.

  • Reply
  • 2014-03-14 09:03
  • 4QSR

> In reply to waya @ 2014-03-13 14:45 from KZ8F - click to readLook. Here is one now.

  • Reply
  • 2014-03-14 09:02
  • 4QSR

If I care enough about the camera being a little bit better than the old one again.. is there anything thats actually good and new.. I can feel the phone market stagnating..

  • Reply
  • 2014-03-14 08:40
  • 2CFp
  • 2014: Z2 vs New One
  • Report
  • Rating0

Samsung is the master of cheating and advertisement.Lets wait and see how it performs in real life.

  • Reply
  • 2014-03-13 14:49
  • 6w@C

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2014-03-13 00:36 from 6}F7 - click to readhow much sammy pay u? kah3 what the joke

  • Reply
  • 2014-03-13 14:45
  • KZ8F

> In reply to Rdmkr @ 2014-03-13 12:08 from 0CPe - click to readWith a good chance of winning though. We will have to wait and see.

  • Reply
  • 2014-03-13 14:40
  • 4QSR

> In reply to teotron @ 2014-03-13 10:17 from p%Y4 - click to readalso smaller than Sony's (1/2.3)

  • Reply
  • 2014-03-13 12:08
  • 0CPe

Thinner sensor?? You kidding me GSMArena?? It says larger chief ray angle, not a thinner sensor. It however does say thinner modules.

  • Reply
  • 2014-03-13 11:52
  • utRd

... well, still nowhere near Nokia's 1020 1/1.5" large image sensor though. S5's camera is a runner up, second best so far.

  • Reply
  • 2014-03-13 10:17
  • p%Y4

I hope,next Samsung Galaxy S5 ("Prime")-model camera technology/ISOCELL-tech (lens light power!) is about 10% much better,what now!!!.

  • Reply
  • 2014-03-13 09:51
  • 6qxG

> In reply to Tobbe @ 2014-03-12 23:31 from 3WLG - click to readYeah saw those shots. They look the same or maybe even slightly worse than what the Note 3 managed. Of course the conditions are different but then the so called improvements don't seem to be doing much for those conditions.

A Russian site has done some more shots with it those are nothing special either. The usual HDR and other shots seem just about the same as what the Note 3 managed.

  • Reply
  • 2014-03-13 08:59
  • nC7L

I don't want to be rude as i like Samsung producs but let's wait and see how it's going to turn out.
Remember the lumia add that was not shot with a lumia but a professional camera?
Marketing is one thing and real life performance is another.
Hope it wil perform as presented.

  • Reply
  • 2014-03-13 08:32
  • MXWL

The thing with Samsung basically seems like they are slowly trying to turn Note into their main Flagship device and keeping Galaxy S series as a backup with smaller and easier to handle handsets that will give competition to the other flagships in the market. They're however trying to keep themselves ahead of the competition with Note series that get latest updates before other competition gets it. So hopefully, we'll be able to see some definite changes in Note 4 later this year.

  • Reply
  • 2014-03-13 07:22
  • bERI

> In reply to M and M @ 2014-03-12 23:29 from dPNi - click to readI second with you..

  • Reply
  • 2014-03-13 06:57
  • KA4t

S5 is just a minor upgrade to S4. Camera is nothing special about this phone. Given the lack of OIS, it will take too much effort to shoot a no blurry picture. Yet another marketing gimmick from Samsung.

  • Reply
  • 2014-03-13 06:04
  • t1$A

I've seen the future of phone cameras. Just head on over to XDA for real world shots and be amazed at it's dynamic range. All these haters will cry when GSM and a bunch of others will soon agree after testing. Great job Samsung in brining us the future of mobile photography.

ISOCell Phase Detection Baby!

  • Reply
  • 2014-03-13 04:35
  • sgyY

Does this mean the blurry mess results of taking pictures indoor is gone? The S4 camera was a big disappointment, even compared to S3 because of the slow shutter speed.

(Knox is Herpes)

  • Reply
  • 2014-03-13 03:26
  • nhuE

FTW Samsung. Greatest phone camera.

Next we wanna see article about the best Wi-Fi tech on S5
Then about the 2 nits up to 500 nits brightness(WOW) on AMOLED , and the real colors

  • Reply
  • 2014-03-13 03:02
  • TXnN

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.