bakzh0, 16 Mar 2014you forgot who's the winner of benchmark cheater?You mean winner of benchmarks? Samsung.
Even the GSM articles state Samsung was not the only to do that. And they stopped. While others are still doing it. And even without it they still topped benchmarks....So????
Like others lying about screens? There is not really even a fix for that. Or making one of the biggest scams in phone history and getting away with it ever year???
Or fake camera commercials? Or ceo's publicly and rudely bashing others out of spite and jealousy?
How about learn some things about the related technology and hard facts before posting here?
Anonymous, 15 Mar 2014Advertising sure...Cheating? That would be apple.you forgot who's the winner of benchmark cheater?
2014: Z2 vs New One, 14 Mar 2014Samsung is the master of cheating and advertisement.Lets wait and see how it performs in real life.Advertising sure...Cheating? That would be apple.
waya, 14 Mar 2014how much sammy pay u? kah3 what the jokeLook. Here is one now.
If I care enough about the camera being a little bit better than the old one again.. is there anything thats actually good and new.. I can feel the phone market stagnating..
Samsung is the master of cheating and advertisement.Lets wait and see how it performs in real life.
Rdmkr, 13 Mar 2014also smaller than Sony's (1/2.3)With a good chance of winning though. We will have to wait and see.
Thinner sensor?? You kidding me GSMArena?? It says larger chief ray angle, not a thinner sensor. It however does say thinner modules.
... well, still nowhere near Nokia's 1020 1/1.5" large image sensor though. S5's camera is a runner up, second best so far.
I hope,next Samsung Galaxy S5 ("Prime")-model camera technology/ISOCELL-tech (lens light power!) is about 10% much better,what now!!!.
Tobbe, 13 Mar 2014I´m not impressed by the camera performance of the Galaxy S5, i found a sites that have ... moreYeah saw those shots. They look the same or maybe even slightly worse than what the Note 3 managed. Of course the conditions are different but then the so called improvements don't seem to be doing much for those conditions.
A Russian site has done some more shots with it those are nothing special either. The usual HDR and other shots seem just about the same as what the Note 3 managed.
I don't want to be rude as i like Samsung producs but let's wait and see how it's going to turn out.
Remember the lumia add that was not shot with a lumia but a professional camera?
Marketing is one thing and real life performance is another.
Hope it wil perform as presented.
The thing with Samsung basically seems like they are slowly trying to turn Note into their main Flagship device and keeping Galaxy S series as a backup with smaller and easier to handle handsets that will give competition to the other flagships in the market. They're however trying to keep themselves ahead of the competition with Note series that get latest updates before other competition gets it. So hopefully, we'll be able to see some definite changes in Note 4 later this year.
S5 is just a minor upgrade to S4. Camera is nothing special about this phone. Given the lack of OIS, it will take too much effort to shoot a no blurry picture. Yet another marketing gimmick from Samsung.
I've seen the future of phone cameras. Just head on over to XDA for real world shots and be amazed at it's dynamic range. All these haters will cry when GSM and a bunch of others will soon agree after testing. Great job Samsung in brining us the future of mobile photography.
ISOCell Phase Detection Baby!
Does this mean the blurry mess results of taking pictures indoor is gone? The S4 camera was a big disappointment, even compared to S3 because of the slow shutter speed.
(Knox is Herpes)