512MB of ram and no camera flash make this a very bad deal.
Looking forward to the 730...
Also, in typical Nokia fashion, the 525 has more ram than the brand new and supposedly superior 630...
People who don't use windows phone criticizing Windows phone... kinda funny. does Moto G come with expandable memory. Nope it's limited to 16 gb. this one comes with 128 gb expandable memory. 32 GB is enough for me. Not gonna buy this device cause i have a 520. WP 8.1 will has everything i need. It's fast and smooth. Doesnt require power hardware. add to that Nokia's extras like double tap to wake, glance screen (Lumia 720 and higher) making life easy. can turn on the screen as many times as i like without using a button. No waving hands like in samsung. cortana will be a fun experience. and IE 11 will be awesome, animated lockscreen. everything is gonna be awesome without having to tinker with custom roms and worry about bugs. Let microsoft worry about quality. Life is stress free
High End OS.
If it has remain as Dual Core, but 1Gb ram.
Flash and Front Camera.
It would have been more Awesome.
Its TOO MUCH OF COST for this config. When compare to the other branded mobiles.
Anonymous, 06 Apr 2014WP ram 512 vs androids 2gb - Wp very limited inbuilt systems apps - limited downable apps - ... moreI wouldn't say WP is limited in downloadable apps. 3 years ago I would have, but not now.
my greatest mistake ever was investin my hard earned money on a lumia. a dumb phone in smart covers.
ramyHR, 06 Apr 2014Sure, but problem is that wp8 works fluid with 512mb, and android lags with 2gb. No, I am not ... moreWP ram 512 vs androids 2gb - Wp very limited inbuilt systems apps - limited downable apps - very limited fucntionalities == poor sales wp phones WORLDWIDE ==customers choices /needs/nokia 630 - even nokia top 1520 NO GAME CHANGERS - even at LOWEST PRICES ..
But seriously, no camera flash? I mean it wouldnt even cost them 5 bucks to add it.
If it had the flash and a gig of ram it would've been a half-decent low/mid end phone with more than acceptable performance. Seriously Nokia has to offer more for less, not charge more for less. They're not in a position to do so
lower pixel density than 620, which also had front camera and flash and this one doesn't.... Fail!
Tase, 06 Apr 2014512 Ram @ that price is not worthy . You can buy better Androids with that kind of money and w... moreSure, but problem is that wp8 works fluid with 512mb, and android lags with 2gb. No, I am not an wp funboy and i wouldn't ever buy 630. What android can you buy for that money??? Some crappy Samsung that will constantly alert you that you don't have enough space for apps... And yes, I know what I'm talking about. I had a lot of android phones and get sick of them. Only bright side about them is Cyanogenmod and other custom roms.
This phone is a disappointment. Seriously, It should have a GB of RAM with flash. It's not better than 520. In fact, it's the same as 520. Just a Quad-core Processor. Seriously, disappointment. It shouldn't be even more than $130
512 Ram @ that price is not worthy . You can buy better Androids with that kind of money and with more power !
$205 is what MS/Nokia/Lumia/WinPhone fanboys will pay to be early adopters of this low-performance phone.
And they need to do that, so Nokia/Microsofts stockholders get some profit for their investments in Smartphone market.
Everybody else will get it for much cheaper later or turn to Androids
The Nokia Lumia 630 is expected to rollout in May, beginning with Asia, Russia, China, India and Europe, from $159 for the single-sim variant, and $169 for the dual-sim variant before subsidies and taxes.
630 = Dual Sim.
635 = single sim.
Maybe We shall see 635 at no more than 130euro .