Glavior, 18 May 2014Personally i think you guys should try the Z3. Currently i'm using the lumia 625 for about 6 m... moreZ3 has it own problem. Blackberry market lack in a lot of apps. Even developer refuse to port apps as they give a excuse as " you can enjoy our android app in bb10".
And bro 1.5gb ram is not enough to run android apps in z3 even 2gb ram in z10 struggle to run droid application. Z3 also has a mediocre camera. Onto that it doesn't support Dual sim and removable battery. Lol
Anonymous, 18 May 2014Nokia should not have launched half hearted Android phone, either u launch a proper Android o... moreWhen you pay more for a Nokia or a FAMOUS brand phone you NOT only pay for specification but also for other things like customer care, repair centres and REGULAR updates. Nokia and other Famous Brands some how has to make more money to provide the above THUS CANT sell high spec phone at low prices... Talk about micromax and karbon?? Lol how many customer care they have? Try to call micromax toll free number now( its switched of as it night and micromax doesn't pay for night duty lol). But you can call Nokia now(as they pay for service with you money that you give in buying a Nokia). So how many micromax and karbon phone got updated? NONE( they don't have money to spend in it) heck even there phone are coming with JB 4.1 (2 year old) in days of kikat. Lol
Anonymous, 18 May 2014Nokia should not have launched half hearted Android phone, either u launch a proper Android o... moreBro you don't understand. Seriously bro I don't know what to say. ANDROID oems have brainwashed you all. What you say? More specs = better phone? My elders use to say don't judge a book by it cover. Didn't you got the meaning then? Hardware it self doesn't make a phone run it the hardware+ software combo. That make it run. Nokia has lessen the hardware but made a strong and light version of android to compensate for its week hardware.
Personally i think you guys should try the Z3. Currently i'm using the lumia 625 for about 6 months now. It's great and it runs buttery smooth on 512mb RAM but when i tried the z3 when i went to a phone store the other day, i played and tinkered with it for about 30 mins trying to play games and run apps and shit. It has almost no lag whatsoever even when i'm playing asphalt or other android games. I really like the gesture-based controlls feels very unique. You guys should definitely give it a try. It's slightly cheaper and i think it'll worth much more than the nokia XL
Glavior, 18 May 2014Blackberry Z3 has much better specs than this and slightly cheaper. With approximately $191 ( ... morePlease buy Z3 at $191 for me. I will pay you that. Anything above that, you have to pay from your pocket. I am sure Z3 won't be available below $210.
osrrham, 18 May 2014you can buy a better speced device for $195...infront of our workplace in a mall is a big stal... moreHey bro people buy Nokia because of it build quality not spec list. A TOYOTA family car has longer spec list than a Lamborghini. So according to you painting a family car red will not make it faster than Lamborghini. Lol. If spec are you deciding buy a china phone.(which will not even last a month)
Sam Boga, 18 May 2014you are right. though Moto E has killer specs, it all comes down to the advertisement and popu... moreSeriously I just got a hands on with Moto E. It lags while flickering though home screen. Lags with a lot of widgets and cant play games well. All cores, ram and stock android goes in drain due to under powered GPU ADRENO 302. And the screen kinda look washed away. I compared asphalt 8 game play on it and my Lumia 520 seriously my 520 loaded the games faster even played with better frame rate
Anonymous, 18 May 2014Nokia should not have launched half hearted Android phone, either u launch a proper Android o... moreBuy Nokia XL if you want Nokia + Lagdroid + billion fartapps + crappy customizations
Buy Nokia 630 if you want Nokia + Performance - billion fartapps and crappy customizations
paxijaan, 18 May 20145" display with a resolution of 800 x 480 pixels???. I wouldn't pay $19.60 for this.Samsung mega's and Grand had even worst resolution and PPI still they sold a lot of them.
Ask a non tech person he doesn't even know what is resolution. Lol
And such person are the customer of Nokia xl
why would someone buy it over moto g? I think even moto e is better than this.
Blackberry Z3 has much better specs than this and slightly cheaper. With approximately $191 ( to its initial pricing in Indonesia) you get 1.2 ghz of qualcomn dual core processors, 1.5 gigs of ram, and qHD display (540x960 resolution). Eventhough it runs on BB 10 OS you can still download popular android apps easily now. So i think the Z3 is much more worth of the money.
just my two cents
paxijaan, 18 May 20145" display with a resolution of 800 x 480 pixels???. I wouldn't pay $19.60 for this.Then it's obviously not aimed a you.
Fofs, 18 May 2014So, when compared to the Moto E, it has a lower reslution, no Google Play Store, a way worse C... moreAnd a replaceable battery, free off-line maps, LED flash, a larger 5" screen and a front facing camera.
paxijaan, 18 May 20145" display with a resolution of 800 x 480 pixels???. I wouldn't pay $19.60 for this.Yes you would.
In Pakistan it's for PKR-17,600(about US$172) announced now a days in ad of a 3G cellular carrier.In open market it should be a little less.I already tested Nokia X(Price SR400)here in Saudi Arabia and it's performance did not impressed me at all.I use Lumia 820 now a days.Nokia X's touch is very laggy and cheap feeling and very slow with 512MB RAM.If it can have Google Android 4.2.2 only then it can become a enough faster and more stable as Android only got from its' "crawling infant" stage to full grown "Strong young adult" when it reached 4.2.2. version.