News - Reader comments

Samsung Galaxy F leaks again, this time in gold

14 June, 2014 | Read the news | Post your comment
Samsung Galaxy F leaks again, this time in gold - read the full textThe Samsung Galaxy F is in the news so much these days that you surely know about it already. It's reportedly going to be the oft-rumored 'premium' version of the Galaxy S5, coming with even better specs and a metallic finish. This time around, we get to see the Galaxy F all dressed up in a...


Sort by:

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2014-06-16 10:07 from IaHc - click to readyes some people do look at the weight, but as an influence to the final buying decision. Someone whos always on the go, would like to feel something lightweight in their hand, helping with speed and efficiency/ease of use. The m8 however, isnt overly lightweight, and at times, feels protruding,making it harder to handle the phone. Ask yourself this question, what is easier to hold, a feather, or a brick?

  • Reply
  • 2014-06-16 11:27
  • m5Wy

> In reply to S M Jana @ 2014-06-16 07:17 from vw7x - click to readreduce weight??? come on, even with metal, it is not that heavy. Do you actually look at the weight of the phone to decide on your buying decision?

  • Reply
  • 2014-06-16 10:07
  • IaHc

Plastics are not really bad. Depends on the type of plastic being used. Polycarbonates are not really that bad. Kevlar is another that has been used by Motorola before. In what way is leather (used in Vertu and other premium phones) better than plastic? After a while, leather gives off. Plastic can be better than metal to reduce weight and provide better grip. I was having a real tough time to use my M8 without a back cover because it was so slippery. When we have a metal phone and cover it up with a plastic back case to avoid slips and scratches, why not accept the phone in a superior plastic itself?

  • Reply
  • 2014-06-16 07:17
  • vw7x

> In reply to htcownerguy @ 2014-06-15 11:39 from U@bs - click to's a copy of the GS5, in metal.

  • Reply
  • 2014-06-16 04:20
  • kegP

for the first time in new generation smartphones, Samsung need to do new display screen mix, LTPS + ClearBlack display (CBD), for great brigtness and very important is save battery power for long hour or day's

  • Reply
  • 2014-06-15 20:17
  • 3bmY

> In reply to ZarateJohnny @ 2014-06-15 04:39 from t7XH - click to readso your an apple fan boy?

  • Reply
  • 2014-06-15 19:25
  • qZ5x

Are display/screen STRONG (safir!) glass???.

  • Reply
  • 2014-06-15 14:10
  • 6uK1

nothing but a copy of LG G3.....

  • Reply
  • 2014-06-15 11:39
  • U@bs

> In reply to ZarateJohnny @ 2014-06-15 04:39 from t7XH - click to readWrong, they're already here and acting pathetic as usual. ;)

  • Reply
  • 2014-06-15 09:54
  • mSs0

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2014-06-14 21:31 from p2Vx - click to read:D like pottato.....

  • Reply
  • 2014-06-15 08:15
  • n9a6

An amazing piece of work, for those who like it, I believe. But not for me. I'd stick with phones from another manufacturer, thanks. :)

  • Reply
  • 2014-06-15 07:43
  • PxVq

Brace youselves, Samsung haters are coming!

  • Reply
  • 2014-06-15 04:39
  • t7XH

For great new hit smartphone of the year Samsung Galaxy F need be great thinner desing and contain this basic specs:
1.Display.- 5.3 inch 2K - LTPS + ClearBlack display - sapphire glass
2.Memory.- 3-4 GB RAM
3.Chipset.- Snapdragon 805 or Tegra K1

  • Reply
  • 2014-06-15 01:53
  • 3bmY

If the phone is full metal then it would give a good consideration. If Plastic again? Sorry, there are much better choice out there.

  • Reply
  • 2014-06-15 01:11
  • tueg

> In reply to Omar Al @ 2014-06-14 19:05 from 3CHy - click to read"Superpower technology" !?!?

  • Reply
  • 2014-06-15 00:25
  • 3kSK

I hate phones which have two different looks for the back and front and this phone is definitely one of them. That is why I love HTC which has a complete look and a flawless OS.

  • Reply
  • 2014-06-14 23:51
  • 0GHr

samsung galaxy f for failure

  • Reply
  • 2014-06-14 23:44
  • qb65

Looks like potato ... 700 dollar more expensive ....

  • Reply
  • 2014-06-14 21:31
  • p2Vx

As usual ugly.

Base on the back look, seems is metal like plastic.

  • Reply
  • 2014-06-14 20:44
  • vV5G

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.