News - Reader comments

Exynos 5433-powered Samsung Galaxy Note 4 benchmarked

20 August, 2014 | Read the news | Post your comment
Exynos 5433-powered Samsung Galaxy Note 4 benchmarked - read the full textThe Samsung Galaxy Note 4 is back at AnTuTu and this time there are benchmark scores. The Samsung N910C is powered by a Exynos 5433 (not to be confused with the Exynos 5430 found in the Galaxy Alpha), while the N910S is based on Snapdragon 805. The new Exynos chipset moves to 64-bit processing...


Sort by:

> In reply to bobluck @ 2014-12-11 19:15 from q{68 - click to readJust got to 50109, with snapdragon 805,the only thing I did was keep the device on top of a fan blowing into it with the back off, so it's alot to do with heat, cold device = higher score.

  • Reply
  • 2015-04-05 17:59
  • mqJm

> In reply to Sunamer @ 2015-01-28 17:40 from kJiE - click to readYour i6 is based on latest Antutu version result. All recent result had changed. Note4 with Exynos 5433 easily hit 53k now..

  • Reply
  • 2015-03-21 19:42
  • wceW

my i6 gets 51730

  • Reply
  • 2015-01-28 17:40
  • kJiE

My N910U with Exynos 5433 runs Antutu and gets benchmark score 49623. Rooted with Greenify setup, about 50 apps installed. I am happy with the result!

  • Reply
  • 2014-12-11 19:15
  • q{68

> In reply to Arenaboi @ 2014-09-05 12:03 from XH1g - click to readThe A57 at 1.9GHz is 57% faster than the 2.7GHz 805 (which is not A15 based btw) on the CPU test. That means it is more than twice as fast clock for clock.

  • Reply
  • 2014-09-16 20:32
  • n5Eg

> In reply to Arenaboi @ 2014-09-05 12:03 from XH1g - click to readThis score will significantly improve once Android L releases as it will finally utilize the 64 bit architecture

  • Reply
  • 2014-09-14 07:12
  • Q}4e

I don't get it. The 805 is still based on the a15 as I understand it, and this is the first a57, a53 octacore big.little design. shouldn't it be SIGNIFICANTLY faster (a LOT more than about 12-15%)?. somewhere in the range of about 40-50% faster?

  • Reply
  • 2014-09-05 12:03
  • XH1g

> In reply to SeloWhey @ 2014-08-21 16:38 from JL0C - click to readNobody knows just yet. Gsmarena I'd just passing along what is provided.
you're asking what everyone is still waiting to find out.
I'm guessing as long as they are clocked equivalently that's actually just a much better a7/a15

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-21 17:42
  • q8QU

> In reply to jnxr @ 2014-08-20 15:28 from vbZN - click to readWhile Snapdragons were better in benchmarks, in real life they loose.
Look at real gaming framerates, you'll be surprised.

Also Samsung made Exynos 5422 much cooler than a year old Exynos 5410. Even after running Antutu twice Galaxy S5 didn't heat up too badly.

Sorry for my bad English.

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-21 17:24
  • gx3f

Guys in this sammobile article it says its a15/a7 combo and 32 bit but GSMArena says its a57/a53 combo and 64 bit I'm a bit confused which one is true, also antutu site is saying there is no arm-v8 environment

Can someone enlighten me please

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-21 16:38
  • JL0C

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2014-08-21 12:15 from 3AxW - click to readLol!!!!!
The one phone made of the most copy cat and tole parts. Or bought...still not original.
One that also copies many of its features from around.
Is so restricted it tells you what you are allowed to do.
Crashes the most app crashes on any smartphone os.
Has some of the buggies releases known to human kind...
So reliable and original. Haha.

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-21 16:36
  • q8QU

should have bought iPhone 100% original 100% reliable.

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-21 12:15
  • 3AxW

> In reply to Nuke @ 2014-08-21 06:28 from KAH$ - click to readLol. Yes. You supposedly had an S5 that got warmer then all other phones so people should not buy the Note 4 when the Note is always the best that comes to mobiles when released. Makes perfect sense.

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-21 09:27
  • q8QU

I made the mistake of buying the exynos powered galaxy s5. I've since sold the phone because of it overheating so much and poor battery life as well. I don't recommend buying the exynos powered note 4 -much like the s5, it's good only on paper. The fact that samsung products are overpriced and depreciate quicker than any other premium phone I urge all of you to think twice before buying the note 4.

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-21 06:28
  • KAH$

Totally agreed. Back to square one. :(

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-21 05:37
  • w4sa

> In reply to ThunderCrackR @ 2014-08-20 23:17 from pk54 - click to readActually the K1 was tested on mipad tablet with 2048x1538 resolution and it's performance still on top.

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-21 03:48
  • tDMr

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2014-08-20 17:55 from w7n@ - click to readsamsung always clock exynos chipsets lower than snapdragon to make both models performance almost identical...

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-21 02:50
  • 6ksN

Lots of effort to push cheap Exynos to convince the third world to accept. Cheap marketing gimmick from Samsung. I do appreciate Samsung dare to work on its own chipset, but none the less its paid benchmark test result. You are killing your own market Samsung. Get ready to be next Nokia. May god bless you! Chinese companies are digging your funeral place...

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-21 02:38
  • tTiV

> In reply to PhoenixGuetta @ 2014-08-20 20:04 from mKZ0 - click to readThey don't have to discontinue but just win further by properly opening up their Exynos line's sources/docs to be more AOSP/GPL compliant. Something that's disturbingly ignored by most Exynos fans, when it is actually crucial not just for rooting or custom ROMs but also for upstream fixes/patches that can be supplied by external devs (if they're allowed to look at problems/issues wholesale not half ass*d).

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-21 02:02
  • ibgV

Welcome back in the first place, Exynos. Nice to see you here again. Remember the K1 was tested on 1920x1080 so half the resolution, of course it scores better than the 5433. Thank Samsung for bringing 8-cores powered processors THIS year (I am looking at you Qualcomm)!

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-20 23:17
  • pk54

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.