News - Reader comments

Samsung M8910 Pixon12 gets an upcoming price tag of 639 euro

24 June, 2009 | Read the news | Post your comment
Samsung M8910 Pixon12 gets an upcoming price tag of 639 euro - read the full textThe dozen-megapixel cameraphone Samsung M8910 Pixon12 is getting closer to its release date and sources in Spain have already gotten hold of the unlocked no-commitment price tag there. One of the hottest mobile phones this summer can be yours for "only" 639 euro. The price tag of 639 euro makes...

 

Sort by:

Has it processor of 1Ghz, FM RDS, USB, TV out, 528 RAM, Unlimited phone memory, G Map, inbuilt dictionary, Qwerty keyboard?

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-26 18:37
  • uBWC

Does someone know the release date for this phone? Is it coming out this month?

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-26 16:56
  • pKN6

I don't know what to think about htis...I know the over all goal of all these companies is to really make is so one thing dose all. Having a phone with a 12mp camrea means there is no need for a mid range digital camera (if its done right). However the price dose seem a lil steep, considering by the end of the year this thing will be obselete

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-26 16:55
  • 4DDS

When is this phone coming out?

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-26 16:21
  • pKN6

seriously, what was samsung even thinking?? an upcoming price of about 640 euros!!! Sure, we know it has a 12MP snapper, but this is mundane! samsung, get a life!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-26 12:47
  • i4d@

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-06-26 09:19 from ijDg - click to readDats for sure Buddy............Lets hope dat apart from this MPx Race other aspects are also looked upon!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-26 11:18
  • vG1A

> In reply to Dilmeet @ 2009-06-26 08:38 from vG1A - click to readthats true, but at least even this relatively surface-based marketing mp race, shows a push for better cameras... and mp does help a little but indeed they are negelecting many aspects of good cameras ie lense quality etc that need to be addressed... heres to hoping they figure it out soon!

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-26 09:19
  • ijDg

Right nw dis device certainly doesn't make ne sense just another high end device out of reach of normal consumers but doesn't even appeal to tech ppl also......

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-26 08:43
  • vG1A

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-06-26 07:57 from ijDg - click to read@anonymous
Yeah Buddy u r absolutely correct dis time............thnx 4 getting my point..........if mob companies end up this weird megapixel race and look 4 convergence den even i wud luv to keep one device dat does both the job done!!! rite nw its not d scene........it wud b gr8 2 hve a normal 3.2 mpx camera phone dat is equivalent to a digital camera and not 1 wid 12 or 24 mpx higly over priced but not gud enugh for a cheap cybershot or powershot......i agree vid u dis time as nw wat v want is a device dat gets both d job done.......rite nw m just seeing smasung release phone aftr phone highly priced ones wid more megapixels and a basic os.......dis is bad 4 consumers isn't it??

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-26 08:38
  • vG1A

> In reply to ynoS_gL_aikoN @ 2009-06-25 18:38 from vpcF - click to readActually Samsung were the first to develop 8MP camera modules just not first to release. As for their phones though personally not a fan.

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-26 08:28
  • 2CJd

> In reply to Dilmeet @ 2009-06-26 07:32 from vG1A - click to readdilmeet; me again,
I agree at the 'moment' there is a reason to have both, no argument here...
also the mp race does not equate to better photos... and much needs to be done to the other aspects of camera quality to catch up to point and shoots...

BUT as i was saying, you must agree that if mob companies continue to push the camera aspects of phones and they do catch up- which they will- this will eliminate need for both devices, converging them neatly into one...

would that not be better???

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-26 07:57
  • ijDg

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-06-25 08:24 from ijDg - click to read@anonymous

i do agree wid u abt convergence............but i hve seen for myself dat carrying two devices gets d job done better...........luk lemme explain........for ocassional shooting like wen m in office or sme place where i just need 2 get sme thng just 4 d moment i wud like a gud mobile cam n belive i hve seen 3.2 mpx of my n78.....its gud enuf......but wen m vid my family on a trip or go smewhere 4 official purpose 2 get sme product images or sme event i need a camera dat does its job well.........previously even i thot convergence thing but aftr seeing fones its better 2 hve two devices fr their job.........m vid u if d device offers d same quality as sony cybershot......till nw i hve concluded dat mobile cams still can't beat digital cameras out dere........i mean wats d use of buying such a high end phone wid a price through d roof......if u cn get a simple 5mpx fone wid a gud cam dat cn guyarantee u of better quality shot as well as occassional shooting.........just cramming 12 mpx wid no innovation is no use fr me........i hve seen n compared digital cam shots and mobile cam shots and even seen d same wid mobile review site.......n trust me dis device does nt fit d bill at all.....i mean megapixels race is just an excuse to innovate things......No innovation just increase d mpx n release to d market wid high price wich is of no use to consumer like me......

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-26 07:32
  • vG1A

Outstading Camera in every one of its features.
Undoubtedly the best mobile-phone-camera ever made.

Im waiting for you, GSM Team, for its review including comparison between its Camera and other great quality cameras such as the Omnia HD, INNOV8 and N86. =)

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-25 22:35
  • 0@cd

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-06-25 03:24 from uH{S - click to readim not just talking about phone's cameras, dude, if you got what i really meant with what i posted, then you've understood it..it's about your beloved Samsung, in general. Your beloved Samsung is trying to dictate higher pricing with their phones by projecting as if they are the leader when it comes to mobile technology, well in fact, they're not! look with what they have come up, and do you really know what a smartphone is? have you read the specs of pixon12? and have it priced that much? common on dude, you're not that damn, are you?

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-25 18:38
  • vpcF

just wait, the pictures will be s.hit

hahahahahaha, even without the price its still a piece of crap

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-25 17:39
  • 04@7

This phone is too expensive!!! I'll be keeping my Pixon until the price of this phone will drop or wait and see what it will be the price of the Samsung M8920 Monaco (when it will be released;))

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-25 17:02
  • M4BE

Only (Idou) aa Samsung No good haye U !

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-25 17:02
  • 3bTQ

Samsung Pixon12 doesn't run Symbian OS, Windows Mobile OS or Android OS, meaning its not a Smartphone. Think first before you post your comment.

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-25 16:28
  • w0QN

Hey guys, for your information samsung pixon12 is not a smartphone

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-25 16:21
  • w0QN

this is very poorrrrrrrrr phone i dont like this type of thing

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-25 15:03
  • uZHa

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.