Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.1
- Features
-
8.1
- Performance
-
8.2
- alsdflksdfj
- Report
> In reply to gurubrar @ 2009-08-23 15:40 from uwVBthis is crap how does this get 8.2 you crazies. it is not better than the samsung impression
- Reply
- 2009-09-02 19:00
- 4ZK8
- U
- @_@
- Report
they dont make any durable fones like these any more.. fones in these generation will last you a decade or more hahaha @_@
- Reply
- 2009-08-13 06:54
- 9Lb6
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
come on dudes!! sum f u r behaving as if it were an ultra modern handset released just now!! give the poor damn thing a break!! Its more than 14 years old....n at dat tym it must hv been a top-of-line fashion statement!!!
- Reply
- 2009-08-12 19:13
- utqN
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-08-09 16:10 from vGg1hello all
u know what
i drove my car over this phone and
it broke hahaha..........
- Reply
- 2009-08-09 16:12
- vGg1
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-08-09 15:56 from vGg1nice connectivity
- Reply
- 2009-08-09 16:10
- vGg1
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to @§§h0L3 @ 2009-08-02 22:32 from bedCthe phone has a nice camera
- Reply
- 2009-08-09 15:56
- vGg1
- R
- @§§h0L3
- Report
> In reply to Zabreet Nokia @ 2009-06-29 17:24 from MR3jWhat the crap! Gimme a break... If you're the one who discovered fire then you must've been burned your ass down. This phone won't be out in the market by 2010 but it will be out in the market in a millenia from now.. =)
- Reply
- 2009-08-02 22:32
- bedC
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
Oh dear, nostalgia... Had one back in 1995, for about a year or two. The d@mn thing was unbreakable. Menu was very straightforward (and very limited, which was rather annoying). Phone would run for up to 4 days with heavy use. Reception was somewhat disappointing, but that could have been caused by haphazard coverage as well. We called it brickie (because it weighed as much).
- Reply
- 2009-07-23 10:38
- i8eZ
- H
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to Zabreet Nokia @ 2009-06-29 17:24 from MR3jOK,first of all, if you found fire, you wouldn't be alive right now, secondly: This was released 1995. The how could it possibly com out end 2010?? This phone has been discontinued!
- Reply
- 2009-07-22 14:05
- Nxsf
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-07-08 09:01 from wrx8my correction the motorola dynatac is actualy the first mobile phone ever made but not to mention it is the biggest brick phone i've ever seen & its not on this website u would probably have to google it.
- Reply
- 2009-07-08 09:09
- wrx8
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to bill @ 2009-07-05 21:15 from Pxikericsson gh 218 was actualy the first mobile phone ever made but it looked like a walkie talkie. nokias 1st phone was in 1995 & ericsson 1st phone was in 1994.
- Reply
- 2009-07-08 09:01
- wrx8
- R
- bill
- Report
damn,,,this is the first phone ever....
it was 1995, im still young,. i just got school in elementary school, this phone was very high tech in that moment....
- Reply
- 2009-07-05 21:15
- Pxik
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to Anto @ 2009-06-25 15:07 from va6JThe 2110, for sure!
- Reply
- 2009-07-04 18:34
- 8NEh
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to Anto @ 2009-06-25 15:07 from va6Jstupid ass the nokia 2110 of coarse
- Reply
- 2009-07-02 06:34
- q5hd
- R
- 2110 Fan
- Report
Can i swap my N79 for this phone. i dont mind paying any cash difference.. thanx
- Reply
- 2009-06-30 15:38
- A8rH
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.


RSS feed