Nokia 2300 - user opinions and reviews
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
6.7
- Features
-
6.3
- Performance
-
6.6
- DMX
- Report
My god... is it so expensive to have at least a greyscale screen on their budget phone? T105 by Sony Ericsson looks better, has more features and has greyscale screen and this is still black and white?...
I bet it's going to be more expensive than the T105.
- Reply
- 2003-08-28 21:36
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
bad series numbers, bad design, bad features... nokia you are doomed !
- Reply
- 2003-08-28 21:12
- U
- quinty
- Report
The theory that these fones are cheap( Intended mostly for the Third World)is hardly valid. It's a really funny that you can get a SE T300 in South Africa cheaper than the Nokia 2100...LOL....Colour screen, GPRS, MMS, Polyphonic ringtones...all for under $70
- Reply
- 2003-08-28 18:50
- U
- mustafabay
- Report
I can under stand that nokia wants the 1100 and 2300 to be cheap phones but I thought the 2100 was going to be cheap here in egypt but it ended up quite expensive for a phone of its likes and both SE t200 and t100 were cheaper and looked better and had better features so where's the logic of a cheap phone?
- Reply
- 2003-08-28 17:25
- U
- cOw_keEper
- Report
huh? where is the colour?? black and white tv ? cool keypad and speical design..
- Reply
- 2003-08-28 11:09
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
Thats right.Most people want to communicate not make coffee with their phone.
- Reply
- 2003-08-28 05:57
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed