Nokia 2600 classic - user opinions and reviews

Nokia

Popularity

Daily interest
4.3%
Total hits:
1110170

Voting results

Design
6.9
Features
6.5
Performance
6.7
Votes:
3160

im coming when first launch in indonesia. very impressed, not only entry level. coz, this phone equiped with an email wizard, and user possibly to change the cover. the fm radio with a 20 presets.

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-22 14:53
  • Py8B
  • U

56k colours?!?! Thats new...

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-22 14:25
  • phWa
  • U

Whats the point of Bluetooth without memory card slot, what are we going to transfer and where.. Its just a 2630 in disguise. Nokia is lazy.

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-22 14:00
  • puyX
  • U

great I like it i will buy it for my mum!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-22 13:36
  • 0xcA
  • U

i think this phone was good... god for all the bastard whose posting there opinions ryt now.. wakekeke rocks

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-22 13:29
  • PDPg
  • U

@ kazekage

this is not a good phone even for a spare phone u know?!

LOL c",)

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-22 13:20
  • PDPg
  • U

....

if we're talking about main phones of course i will not waste money on this hehe, no offense.. 2630 is better

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-22 12:35
  • PDPg
  • U

whow, at least to the specs, the battery is pretty amazing, I'll say!

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-22 12:35
  • 0xNp
  • U

maybe Nokia just wanted to create budget phones that could just be an extra unit, like here at my hometown.. we often 2 sim cards and we prefer that both sim are working in an individual unit.. compare the interface of other budget phone of other brands, this ones good from the display and the fonts.. very likable

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-22 12:31
  • PDPg
  • U

this phone is good as nokia 3110classic

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-22 12:29
  • 2SR7
  • U

i agree with Jon2 !

and thats also true, Nokia and SE are jusr releasing the same phones again and again! same features and same design.
same as before nothings changed..just the keypad...

???

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-22 12:27
  • nEwT
  • U

@aLLeXiNho

its your choice if you buy the expensive fones or the cheap ones like 2600. if you can afford buying n82,8800 etc..then why not? you can buy great fones which are not too expensive....you can also buy cheap fones like this one and after a few weeks you'll start wishing it has 5mp camera,mp3,ms applications blah blah blah.

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-22 12:23
  • PDPg
  • U

nokia and SE are just same stupid...they released phone with similiar design every years, every months, every year... we should burn their design department.. get a life nokia and SE...

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-22 12:09
  • PFKq
  • U

In my opinion, this is a good phone.. The battery life is very good comparing to other phones.. I'm agree with u guy's.. nokia should work at design and..price as well. Phones that look great, with 5 mp camera and other facilities are very expensive.. For ex here in Romania.. The medium salary is 150-200euro. Phones like n95, n82, e90, 8800 sapphire arte, 8800 arte, 8600 luna are more then 600euro.. how about that?

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-22 12:01
  • nDRS
  • U

this one's fit for an extra phone at hand, w/mms and radio.. good surviving kit

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-22 11:53
  • PDPg
  • U

just a mere marketing strategy!!

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-22 11:52
  • PEGw
  • U

your right....

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-22 11:49
  • PDPg
  • U

First..

Honestly, I don't see the point why Nokia is making phones like these when phones with very similar specs are available in the market.
???

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-22 11:26
  • vx6u
  • U

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.