Samsung Galaxy S II ICS review: Sugar coated
HTC One S review: OnederfulNokia 2600 classic - user opinions and reviews
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
6.8
- Features
-
6.4
- Performance
-
6.6
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
some of the features are outdated like VGA camera, 10 MB memory and no 3g support and no expandable memory , no dual sim and very slow recharge of battery
- Reply
- 2010-08-22 10:14
- utgJ
- H
- jay
- Report
- 0
its an ok phone i suppose the browser is horrible tough when inputting txt in2 google or sumtin it lags behind by a few letters and have to wait for phone to catch up software is very very very slow on this phone but other than that everytin else is gud for 29euro its worth it to be honest 10mb memory aint all that much but its a low cost device and you get wat u pay for !!
- Reply
- 2010-08-10 18:02
- 3iL}
- H
- fasal
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2010-07-30 17:17 from ftIC - click to readfirst you check antinapad ok then you check/antina cunection in motherbord ok check antina swich ic ok so/we can understant power ic
- Reply
- 2010-08-05 12:52
- v{Tb
- R
- Mahmood
- Report
- 0
its too slow and i dont like its enough memory of 10MB. not option for expend
- Reply
- 2010-08-04 12:15
- u1F@
- H
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
well its very nice that nokia had made such a phone that almost have all the facilities like blue tooth but still it is very cheap only 12mb is not enough so..............i dont like it
- Reply
- 2010-07-26 10:24
- ut6a
- U
- Zoki
- Report
- 0
About 20 months ago I bought it for my mother.
It's price was either 291Kn=41€ or 391Kn=55€ today.Whatever of those 2 in my oppinion it was still very cheap-cheap.
It can be a bit slow sometimes,there are some MINOR issues with keyboard +it prevents me to transfer my 10MB-15MB MP3 files from my phone to it.
But it's 10MB or 12 is more than enough for around 10games by download and a few pictures.
It's very comfortable in hand,battery is also very lovely.
It fallen a few times and houssing and keyboard spread accros room,but it was easy to put it together again in minute or 2 and guess what,it worked like new.
Although it's no match for my SEW995(obviously),It's Great Choice for people that need phones for phonecalls and text messaging+a few neat extra functions.
My mother is very happy with it.
High recomendation.:-)
- Reply
- 2010-07-21 12:23
- SH{R
- H
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
it is hurting to say that a good phone like this has very low memory
- Reply
- 2010-07-12 16:23
- Mfxa
- C
- To: ALL
- Report
- 0
Heh, if you want to be cool with this phone, then don't buy it. When you want a comfortable phone, that have minimized features, and is very cheap and very easy/good to use, then buy it!
- Reply
- 2010-07-09 15:55
- pEf9
- U
- deepika
- Report
- 0
> In reply to mae @ 2010-07-04 00:18 from v0qx - click to readyup, i agree
- Reply
- 2010-07-08 05:39
- 2@1f
- R
- deepika
- Report
- 0
i bought this nokia 2600 classic phone.. cuz i had a trust on the name"nokia" rather than soni, samsung..etc. but sooner i found, i wasted ma money,, dis phone scuzzz.. HUH
- Reply
- 2010-07-08 05:37
- 2@1f
- U
- paul
- Report
- 0
i would like to ask if nokia 2600 can be use by people in US? specifically in NY.
- Reply
- 2010-07-06 10:20
- RKnx
- U
- Mayank
- Report
- 0
> In reply to bigCrap @ 2010-05-26 19:39 from SaB$ - click to readThis is a very beautiful phone .
- Reply
- 2010-07-04 19:10
- YT88
- C
- mae
- Report
- 0
I hate this cellphone . i have it !
soo boring to use i dont like
- Reply
- 2010-07-04 00:18
- v0qx
- C
