Nokia N9 review: Once in a lifetime
8 megapixel mega shootout: Picture thisNokia 2610 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.1
- Features
-
6.5
- Performance
-
6.8
- Ammar Hyder
- Report
- 0
No IrD, No Bluetooth, even No USB. Whats this??????
- Reply
- 2006-05-02 13:53
- PSdp
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
good looking phone.. nokia rules now and forever ;)
- Reply
- 2006-04-26 13:23
- niIT
- U
- Kal
- Report
- 0
Evereything excepted. No mutimedia features..No cam..No MP3..No bluetooth..No fancy features fine..some people dont need them. But why just 3 mb memory and why 65K color screen. if we really need a phone just for communication those are still out there..then why bringing these models up in 2006? what did we learn in so many years then?..(not to mention nokia even came up with a monochrome phone, such a shame). They are not going to sell it for 25USD? Are they?
- Reply
- 2006-04-26 12:22
- Ybt$
- U
- Adrián
- Report
- 0
holly "·$%&/()=.... why does nokia have to create spam like that??? nokia has a lot of phones... yeah, what a great phone
- Reply
- 2006-04-25 06:03
- PqcK
- U
- gapz
- Report
- 0
Hello Mavi this phone has no gprs!! It is just an average phone juz to make an recv call.Nothing interesting!
- Reply
- 2006-04-19 10:56
- PIWR
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Nokia...u need to get a NEW DESIGN~
I've seen Nokia phones since 1998 and the design still hasn't changed much...
still the same old brick phone...
ppl may say it's simple and easy to use but
come on...it's not like you're still stuck
in 1998~ try something different guys~~
Look how far Samsung and other phones have
come... from brick => folder => slide design
[and guys who are critical of designs don't
even attempt to criticize Samsung for making
folder phones and slide as copies from other
companies because you know what? Samsung has
had domestic mobile market for a long time
and I remember seeing folder design phones
before Moto releasing their folder~ and same
for Siemens with the slide]
- Reply
- 2006-04-18 03:18
- xiEY
- U
- gede
- Report
- 0
Its beautifull.........
Long life batre
But i think it willbe expensive one, better buy 1110.
- Reply
- 2006-04-16 13:34
- PEIA
- U
- fherduz
- Report
- 0
just do your homework guys if your planning to buy mobile devices such as this.....
- Reply
- 2006-04-14 05:42
- Rxch
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
A toy is a GIJOE A TONKA is a toy .musisians like to play with music instruments not toys if you like to listen to musique while you are joging so you buy i ipod mp3 video player to get pumped up with the beat it motivates you to go faster but youre also gowing out of the house for 6 hours do you whant a ipod and a toy phone or a phone that can take quality pictures videos play youre music go in a cofe shop or close to an are^port downtown check youre email beckose you E70 has wi-fi the office uses blackberry servise and voip !!! you definetly are in busness .a computer or laptop are toys just as mutch as the 6682 it's just that this is a solid toy phone
- Reply
- 2006-04-13 07:41
- 4Bck
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
This phone is like foward to the past. IT HAS NOTHING!
You could buy a 6610i nokia if you so badly wanted a boring phone for about a tenth of the price.
- Reply
- 2006-04-12 21:51
- n1c{
- U
- mavi
- Report
- 0
I tink i lyk d phone bcoz it hs gprs.Ppl can i ask?Wats d diffrence btween WAP1.2.1 and WAP2?Email me thnx
- Reply
- 2006-04-12 15:29
- j2CC
- U
- kuvlam
- Report
- 0
Having my way trough the specs and its appearance, i must say that this will propably be my next phone. Simply because i have been looking for a long time a mobile that isnt filled with cameras, mp3 players etc. just to get the price up. Plus most of the the phones ive looked over the past years look good but they cost alot and have functions that i dont need (read: i dont want to pay from something i dont need). To me phones (mobile and wire) have alvays been just short contact measures, not toys.
This particular model catched my eye, it looks decent (perhaps it could be more modern-like), its functions match my need (near perfectly) and its no too small (judging py the appearance). Plus, in Finland most of the Nokia models i think look very good cost like hell and some of them (example 6060) have stupid defects like missing outer display and an external antenna.
People say that these are boring and have no "soul", and of course missing functions (mp3, camera, videophone capabilities etc.) but i think some of us just want a phone instead of a toy rattle.
- Reply
- 2006-04-10 13:51
- iLyP
- U
- raja----Universalthi
- Report
- 0
this phone is GUD but nokia might intro mob wid more features and also it would been good if it provides multimedia phone for this Rate
- Reply
- 2006-04-08 20:56
- 2SMC
- U
- Macseth
- Report
- 0
This phone is just made for another profitable market. Think about it, if no one buys such phone, would they even think of even design more of such normal end phone? And don't even comment if people here thinks such phone dont look good. There are more 3G phone models in line now than such "low-end" phones to choose from. If you feel disgusted by the phone, u can don't click the link to read its specs u know...
- Reply
- 2006-04-08 08:29
- PFMY
- U
- titus
- Report
- 0
OK. This is the "comming back to common sense" era of the mobile phones. I believe someone somewhere realized that spending Euro 300 (~ $ 350) - I believe this is the medium cost of a high class mobile phone - is rather stupid when it's use for its basic features: to call somebody. I wonder how many of those who buy expensive mobile phones actually use their full technological capacities? 10 %? Even fewer?
Well done Nokia, I was looking for a decent Nokia made phone. Now I have a few models to choose from.
- Reply
- 2006-04-07 07:20
- nyfK
- U
- Koné
- Report
- 0
Yes, I agree with you Marc. For those who blame this phone, just stop using your tongue and use your head. Does everyone in this world have hundreds of dollars to buy a mp3 and million pixels phone? And why don't they use the old phones with the same fonctions? Because they have the right to use new and nice phone which are cheap enough for them. There are also ones who have enough money but don't need camera and mp3 phone. Just ask your grandfather as if he would like to have a mp3 phone? Critics are good for developpement but not in this case.
- Reply
- 2006-04-07 00:18
- mmhe
- U
