Nokia 2650 - user opinions and reviews

Nokia

Popularity

Daily interest
0.2%
Total hits:
849966

Voting results

Design
7.1
Features
6.3
Performance
6.5
Votes:
2258


Sort by:

LOL, I don't think Nokia quite gets how to make a clamshell.

  • Reply
  • 2004-10-02 16:58
  • U

Nice looking and affordable. All the functions one would expect from a real phone without any complications, such as camera, MP3 player or radio.
Still what about connectivity? USB? IRDA? Bluetooth?
And whar about an exterior screen, that would normally show the time, signal and battery levels?
If the battery *really* will hold for one week at a moderate use (as the specifications indicate), then it is perfect. Anyway I think it beats the Samsung that are renown for the need to be recharged every 2-3 days.

  • Reply
  • 2004-10-01 11:06
  • U

so i can just say itīs chit donīt u know why becose i am waiting for this model and then u said itīs in the third part of this year normally in september but even that nothing came and i can say just and advice that itīs better to be more serious and to say the truth ok and this my email and i hope that u will send me a message when itīs coming really or that nokia 6170 thank u

  • Reply
  • 2004-10-01 08:28
  • U

I would like to know the price and special features for the Nokia 2650 and the country of origin

  • Reply
  • 2004-09-29 06:58
  • U

This particular phone really does attracts women.. but keep in mind that some women are so stupid to mistaken this phone as her sanitary pad !!!

  • Reply
  • 2004-09-25 15:43
  • U

please i wanna know the price of nokia 2650 in egypt and kwait

  • Reply
  • 2004-09-25 03:18
  • U

Not the best looking phone on the market it has to be said, but then it is only meant to be a bottom-level entry into the clamshell mobile market. Something I am happy about as I have no need of a camera, games, mp3 player, quad-band, gadget-laden piece of technology when all I want to do is make a phone call! Well-done Nokia for introducing an alternative to the ever-increasing price and sophistication of the modern phone, and therefore saving me a substantial amount of money. As for the design, well a better colour scheme would be nice, but everything else is just pandering to the view that a mobile phone is nothing but an expensive fashion accessory instead of a practical device whose primary purpose is simply to MAKE PHONE CALLS. All those that complain about the minutiae of its design and function to the point where they sound as if there lives depend on it....GET A LIFE.

  • Reply
  • 2004-09-25 00:19
  • U

stylist phone for middle class n phone collector

  • Reply
  • 2004-09-22 03:11
  • U

This phone looks very diffrent?????

  • Reply
  • 2004-09-21 05:57
  • U

I have seen a dummy of this phone. I use it to rest my pen on it. My pen looks very comfortable resting on it HAHAHAHHAHA.

  • Reply
  • 2004-09-20 16:36
  • U

I agree with you guys about that "Space" between the keypad and the screen.I mean,that space couldve been brought to better use,like a bigger screen or something.Also,if this phone has a camera and MP3 Player then it'll be a pretty neat phone.I think this plain design is simplicity at its best.I prefer this sort of design than those fancy ones that Nokia is producing.It has the same problem with 7200 in the sense that,it has a BIG flip but a tiny screen.Its like having a big face and really small eyes.Just doesnt work out.

  • Reply
  • 2004-09-18 13:55
  • U

This phone looks like a deck chair. Fair enough its aimed at the youth without money, but come on, dont punish them...

  • Reply
  • 2004-09-17 05:25
  • U

yuck yuck

  • Reply
  • 2004-09-16 17:23
  • U

Wake up Nokia you slipped way down here whats the great white lagoon between the keys and screen. Would be intelligent and sell like a hot cake if it had a bigger screen 126 x 160 px. Nothing to show off very ugly, Whoops you forgot the external screen FIRE YOUR DESIGNER he knows nothing about FLIP Phones send him on sabatical to Samsung

  • Reply
  • 2004-09-15 14:30
  • U

what? is this a phone. ? so much for nokia

  • Reply
  • 2004-09-10 21:01
  • U

Hi yall,

I think that this phone could have been designed much better. When you open the flip there is way too much "white" space between the keys and the screen. Nokia Could have easily packed in a 128 x 160 px screen.
A 65K screen would not increase the costs too much, maybe around $30. Camera doesn't worry me at all, just the screen is important.
Low Cost is important, but that doesn't mean that you have to get cheap and old technology in a new design.
And I'm sure once this phone is out it won't be cheap either, it's a Nokia.

cheers

  • Reply
  • 2004-09-09 07:16
  • U

the phone is too big if u look att te futures, it shuld be smaler.. wierd design in the opening mekanism is it any good?
PS. nokia shuld make a similar phone but smaler.

  • Reply
  • 2004-09-08 23:23
  • U

It is a lower cost phone. So, it won't have amazing features. Not everyone wants, or can afford to have a phone with almost EVERYTHING.

  • Reply
  • 2004-09-07 18:46
  • U

Saw this phone last week . Only basic functions to make a call, but nice and small. Will be a success if the price is very cheap.

  • Reply
  • 2004-09-07 10:09
  • U

it's very nice and lovely.i will like to have one when is out.

  • Reply
  • 2004-09-06 18:45
  • U

Sort by:
Total of 396 user reviews and opinions for Nokia 2650.