I think that this phone could have been designed much better. When you open the flip there is way too much "white" space between the keys and the screen. Nokia Could have easily packed in a 128 x 160 px screen.
A 65K screen would not increase the costs too much, maybe around $30. Camera doesn't worry me at all, just the screen is important.
Low Cost is important, but that doesn't mean that you have to get cheap and old technology in a new design.
And I'm sure once this phone is out it won't be cheap either, it's a Nokia.
the phone is too big if u look att te futures, it shuld be smaler.. wierd design in the opening mekanism is it any good?
PS. nokia shuld make a similar phone but smaler.
It is a lower cost phone. So, it won't have amazing features. Not everyone wants, or can afford to have a phone with almost EVERYTHING.
Saw this phone last week . Only basic functions to make a call, but nice and small. Will be a success if the price is very cheap.
Ok, again I have to add my comment.
I won't even complain about the design...It's daring...not my taste whatsoever. But you know...there's someone out there who might like it....maybe....
Features? Do I really need to mention features? Someone said that people want simple technology that is easy to use.
HOW ON EARTH is a good, bright, clear, decent, BIG color screen COMPLICATED?????
I want to see MORE not focus on this little square, NOKIA are YOU REALLY THAT DUMB????? Do some Marketing Research!!!!
How is a freakin' Flip-phone without an external screen NOT ANNOYING???? It possibly even answers the call if you just want to look who is actually trying to call?!?
NOKIA, you know nothing about Flip phones. Get some help...quickly!
The rest of the stuff is ordinary, nothing to be proud of.
The type and colour of this mobile is very extreme and is the new style of mobiles but i prefer to be with photo camera and video camera as others
When this phone is open its the type of phone you'd expect to see in a mental institution (it looks like the material they use for the padded cells), closed it just looks like a plain red box. VERY UGLY PHONE!!
this phone is ugly!!!!!! i dont care about the features is ure wudnt wanna be seen wit one of these
did you know that 7200 was designed for a Louis Vuitton designer? Is not so much a phone, is a upper class accessorie... this one has the same end, but in budget phones area. I would rate this one with an 8 and the 7200 with a 10 (from 0 to 10). Great look
Anyone else convince Nokia needs to fire their designer??????????? This phone is even worse than the 7200. I know its incredibly negative to focus on design, yes it has great features and is up to date but I wouldn't want to carry a phone around that looks like this. The 7200 was a horrendous design. I think Nokia can't make flip phones they all look so square, basic and bland. Come on Nokia, hire a new designer and you will make an AWESOME flip phone eventually!!!!
this is a fashion cheap phone, is not for old people with no style and no good taste... Some people will never have that... Great phone, probably i'll get one as second phone
Hey gerko guess what, its a cheap phone! Don't you think you are asking too much? Is price will be something around 100euros not 250 or up. Do you wanna compare it to that crapy sendôs at the same price? this is mutch better
What is this piece of $h|t again? 4096 colors??? Class4 GPRS??? No IR or BT??? Ridiculous!
jealous of nokia? hahah i'm one of the people who abandon nokia and goes for SE
I think it's an ideal phone from NOKIA for the less techy folks; people who don't need a camera or any other contraptions/complications, someone that simply needs to make and recieve phone calls.
come on lahx ppl.. jealous tat nokia fones are better den the others? sae it!! dunch nid to tok bad bout nokia when dey r actually gd kaes.. all nokia fones rawks to da core manx!! NOKIA NOKIA NUMBER 1~~~