Nokia 2650 - user opinions and reviews

Nokia

Popularity

Daily interest
0.2%
Total hits:
849834

Voting results

Design
7.1
Features
6.3
Performance
6.5
Votes:
2258


Sort by:

well, i like my phone. No frills....just make or answer your calls. Pretty straightforward. I like the displays too..i can do wthout the MP3s and stuff..i have stereos in the car, at home and office. why should my phone play music. Downside for me is inability to browse the web.
And the battery goes out fast, plus i can't find a good one to replace it in Nigeria

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-19 16:42
  • mJZe
  • U

frankly' i think this fone is gr8 but the people who wrote that fone is ugly i think they dont take care of it so why did they bought it from the beging any way its good and who said that its a bad reciver ther are wrong its good and the false may be from there operator not from the fone and the rapper keybad is not bas it looks pretty not bad thnx all salam from egy
bay c bye u

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-15 16:13
  • ft0e
  • U

hello everybody
i purchased this phone nearly last year,at the the beginning it was going well although sometimes it didnt work but i guess that happens to all phones

but now after nearly a year,,it is almost not working,,
-when opening 3 quarters of the screen is black and the screen saver is still there and wont go ,,pressing the keys doesnt do anything

-when talking sometimes it displays insert sim card

-sometimes it doest ring at all ,,and doest respond to any calls as tall although the network dashes r complete

-the cover is nearly removed

-the light sequences nearly dont work or usualy hang

i feel that i regret getting this phone,, coz it doesnt have so many feautures and now it is almost dead,,,,

with this amount of money i could have bought any other brand with better and more features

i'm almost worried to get another nokia phone
i dont know what happened to them

  • Reply
  • 2007-08-28 14:27
  • iEtN
  • U

Excellent, simply, stylish and very practical phone. It only lacks an infrared, bluetooth or USB port and the performance it's not that great, but who cares? It's just a phone! Who wants a swiss-knife-like-cellphone can go to a N73 or a K800. Sadly, in Brazil we just have the silver option and it's so expensive to fix it that it's better buy another one.

  • Reply
  • 2007-08-22 19:40
  • LxNq
  • U

It's such a nice phone. Good display and bright light boosts the clarity of the screen. The only drawback is that it doesn't have bluetooth, infrared,edge and got only shared memory of 1Mb.

  • Reply
  • 2007-07-22 22:56
  • jkrx
  • U

how can nokia even think of putting in a 1100 like keypad on such a nice clamshell.... i don have a prob with the design otherwise .... n all thoze dumbz ...compared high endz with this .... yo lack gray matterz dude...(eva heard the term low-end)
get a n95 or k800 instead.....
java 2.0 n a 65k screen would have been nice ...... ..yeah u don get a cam in that price...... :))))

  • Reply
  • 2007-06-27 14:06
  • 2F2N
  • U

Great phone, this was my first and the one I'm currently using until I get a new phone in september. The keypad is great and I don't know why people are complaining about it, the flashing is a great feature, and everything is simple and easy to use.i like how the sim card slot is at the side aswell, and I drop this phone ALOT and it still works perfecty fune. The only thing I don't really like is that the plastic on the inside is starting to peel off a bit at the bottom. I'd giive it a 9/10 for a low end phone.

  • Reply
  • 2007-06-27 13:16
  • M{3J
  • U

this phone looks damn ugly... yakzzzz... thank god i'm not using this phone....

  • Reply
  • 2007-05-30 06:44
  • PMQt
  • U

There's no beauty on Nokia 2650! The model must have been simply made by High Sch Engineering students on apprentice scheme!!

  • Reply
  • 2007-05-29 04:52
  • PxW@
  • U

this fone is ugly to my brains seriously the point of fones r 4 thry to be nice and not pad looking! it looks like a pad ewwwwwwww why would u put one of those things to your ear

  • Reply
  • 2007-05-19 05:55
  • 2G6G
  • U

the fone is guly!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2007-05-01 10:28
  • RNZs
  • U

Having using this phone as long as it has been on the market, I appreciate its ringtones, small size and functionality. The translucent keypad works great as a short range pocket light. Some problems with sound, especially at the time on connecting the call, like a small explosion. The design of the keypad is downright USSR 1970´s, but you will see it only a few seconds when answering or making a call. The blinking white and blue lights are helpful finding the phone when it rings. I would buy this product again, if I had to.

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-17 04:24
  • mtne
  • U

i had the roxy version 2650 and it is shi* no camera is the worse part and the screan iz way to small and it looks like a pad

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-22 06:25
  • PASq
  • U

this fone luks great
but the downsides are-
1.no camera(at least a VGA)
2. no card slot
3.colour not enough (at least 65k)
4.and the lack of fm radio and MP3 playa

besides these dis fone is awsum

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-13 14:37
  • w9KB
  • U

8anasakis, you can't compare a cheap €60 phone like the 2650 to a €400 phone like the K800.

  • Reply
  • 2007-01-24 03:35
  • S6eL
  • U

This is a pretty cool phone i reckon the key padding is fine because if its raining and your txting it cant get water inside the phone i think it's a superb first phone not to many confusing features although it does have a awful range of signal! But overall i think its a cool phone

  • Reply
  • 2007-01-17 01:54
  • TCmX
  • U

the fone is cool, but the only issue i have with it is the keypad, why in the world would nokia make something like that. i wish the keypad wasn't like that. but aside that it is a good piece.

  • Reply
  • 2007-01-08 16:55
  • mcCM
  • U

Let's begin:
1) features: an extreme dissapointment:
a)no Mp3 feature (OUTRAGEOUS!)
b)no camera (IMPOSSIBLE!)

2)bad design (WHAT IS THIS, A SEAT-BELT PHONE?)
very very very very very dissapointing design

3)performance: WEAK
every cheap phone has the capabilities of a cheapskate phone as expected.
---------------------------------------------

Last thing to say:
I got the Sony Ericsson (the best brand) K800 phone which is perfect [3.2 MegaPixels, Cybershot, BestPic, Videocalls...it is a 3g phone(a third-generation phone, that is what it means)

Yeah, the k800 is the best phone out, no phone can compete the k800 as it has the best design, the best features, the best camera, and its stand by time is incredible!

and...

Yeah, the 2650 is the worst phone out...even the gx25 has better design...

NOKIA is a huge dissapointment, when will NOKIA learn from the MASTER,and of course I am talking about Sony Ericsson!?

  • Reply
  • 2006-12-30 16:48
  • pueV
  • U

Hi All,
I live in Australia and im looking for a mobile around $50- $150. Ive beeen looking at the Roxy 2650 and the LG KG225. What is the difference between the KG 220 and the 225? And what is the difference between this phone and the newer one- they look da same

Vicki

  • Reply
  • 2006-12-15 00:50
  • wg}Q
  • U

it's a great phone. been using it since jan 2005 though got bad once i think it's sometin like flex an whonce fixed it's been working i love the blue light ex. at night or when u hve missed calls

  • Reply
  • 2006-12-14 12:54
  • N75%
  • U

Sort by:
Total of 396 user reviews and opinions for Nokia 2650.