Nokia 2650 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.1
- Features
-
6.4
- Performance
-
6.6
- steph
- Report
i had the roxy version 2650 and it is shi* no camera is the worse part and the screan iz way to small and it looks like a pad
- Reply
- 2007-02-22 06:25
- PASq
- U
- abdullah
- Report
this fone luks great
but the downsides are-
1.no camera(at least a VGA)
2. no card slot
3.colour not enough (at least 65k)
4.and the lack of fm radio and MP3 playa
besides these dis fone is awsum
- Reply
- 2007-02-13 14:37
- w9KB
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
8anasakis, you can't compare a cheap €60 phone like the 2650 to a €400 phone like the K800.
- Reply
- 2007-01-24 03:35
- S6eL
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
This is a pretty cool phone i reckon the key padding is fine because if its raining and your txting it cant get water inside the phone i think it's a superb first phone not to many confusing features although it does have a awful range of signal! But overall i think its a cool phone
- Reply
- 2007-01-17 01:54
- TCmX
- U
- lexington
- Report
the fone is cool, but the only issue i have with it is the keypad, why in the world would nokia make something like that. i wish the keypad wasn't like that. but aside that it is a good piece.
- Reply
- 2007-01-08 16:55
- mcCM
- U
- 8anasakis
- Report
Let's begin:
1) features: an extreme dissapointment:
a)no Mp3 feature (OUTRAGEOUS!)
b)no camera (IMPOSSIBLE!)
2)bad design (WHAT IS THIS, A SEAT-BELT PHONE?)
very very very very very dissapointing design
3)performance: WEAK
every cheap phone has the capabilities of a cheapskate phone as expected.
---------------------------------------------
Last thing to say:
I got the Sony Ericsson (the best brand) K800 phone which is perfect [3.2 MegaPixels, Cybershot, BestPic, Videocalls...it is a 3g phone(a third-generation phone, that is what it means)
Yeah, the k800 is the best phone out, no phone can compete the k800 as it has the best design, the best features, the best camera, and its stand by time is incredible!
and...
Yeah, the 2650 is the worst phone out...even the gx25 has better design...
NOKIA is a huge dissapointment, when will NOKIA learn from the MASTER,and of course I am talking about Sony Ericsson!?
- Reply
- 2006-12-30 16:48
- pueV
- U
- Vicki
- Report
Hi All,
I live in Australia and im looking for a mobile around $50- $150. Ive beeen looking at the Roxy 2650 and the LG KG225. What is the difference between the KG 220 and the 225? And what is the difference between this phone and the newer one- they look da same
Vicki
- Reply
- 2006-12-15 00:50
- wg}Q
- U
- gbabijo
- Report
it's a great phone. been using it since jan 2005 though got bad once i think it's sometin like flex an whonce fixed it's been working i love the blue light ex. at night or when u hve missed calls
- Reply
- 2006-12-14 12:54
- N75%
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
if all you want is a fone for calling & texting & easy to use this is all you need
- Reply
- 2006-12-05 14:23
- IeTF
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
This phone is the most pathetic piece of technology I have ever had the misfortune of buying. DONT EVER BUY THIS PHONE!!!!!!!
- Reply
- 2006-11-17 14:22
- Rx}9
- U
- Ruhul Amin
- Report
It's one of the most third class sets from Nokia. It has very low signals, very low battery duration, and very low life of the Rebon.You should never buy this phone, if you don't want to waste your money.The only plus point is its soft keypad.
- Reply
- 2006-11-13 08:03
- SkE9
- U
- Anne
- Report
This phone was one of my favourites ever!! unfortunetly it took its last breath today as it fell in a poll of water in my boyfriends boat. It short circuted and is now completly broken. It was really cheap, worked great, excellent features and i loved the flip phone effect with the blue light.. that i will miss the most
- Reply
- 2006-11-08 18:16
- Srp8
- U
- Century
- Report
What is the difference between Nokia 2650 and Nokia 2652?
- Reply
- 2006-10-08 12:24
- ibaX
- U
- Ramgopal
- Report
i got this phone by jan 05 and still using it, i love this model, it has become my default handset. i use its features- timed profile, alarm, contact groups, folder organisation.. very well. All these days, the only problems arised are that i changed the keypad, and the cable in the mid-joint teared due to extensive use and i got it replaced. To me, the only problem with this model is the bad quality of the keypad, it'll tear out within a few months!...
- Reply
- 2006-09-19 04:51
- 2SN5
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
My dad used it for about 6 months, then I used it for 8 months. Suddenly one day, it started restarting whenever flap is closed. NOkia service centre ppl say that the whole motherboard is damaged. got it repaired from some local store twice. The flap problem is fixed but it doesnt detect sim anymore. No chance of doing it coz i am planning to throw it in garbage.
I wont recommend it to anyone. Easy to use until it breaks down. Repair costs are high because everytime phone has to be opened, the rubber keypad has to be peeled off and has to be glued back again. and the keypad peels off on its own.
I have lost all faith in nokia and their customer care promises n all. One of my other handset 1100 had also troubled me a lot.
I WILL NEVER BUY OR RECOMMEND NOKIA TO ANYONE.
- Reply
- 2006-09-04 17:16
- 2S$a
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
this phone is grt...unfortunately it got wrecked...apart from that i loved it..small and easy...and the blue light is the best feature.
- Reply
- 2006-08-12 20:08
- PSdd
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed