Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
6.9
- Features
-
6.9
- Performance
-
6.9
- Vinayak
- Report
- 0
> In reply to lungy @ 2009-12-10 08:28 from fstc - click to readin that some diffrent look up wont to see the market now a days ppl are craz on tuch screen so in that be low 10000/- not have any tuch screen so ppl are looking tuch in that range only thats it
- Reply
- 2009-12-11 12:55
- vGCV
- Q
- Kabute
- Report
- 0
Looks great..like its handiness but only problem is an archaic Symbian S40. Why did Nokia do this?
- Reply
- 2009-12-11 12:17
- vx6}
- C
- Brian
- Report
- 0
> In reply to lungy @ 2009-12-10 08:28 from fstc - click to readIt's cheap...
- Reply
- 2009-12-10 15:42
- mJrt
- R
- lungy
- Report
- 0
im working in a phone shop pips cum nun stop luking for this phone it must be a gud 1,seriously wht special about it ???
- Reply
- 2009-12-10 08:28
- fstc
- U
- Manpreet
- Report
- 0
Nice phone, with 3.5 mm jack and 2.2 inches screen and good to have GPS in it. Probably it'll attract nokia lovers as many facilities in small phones
- Reply
- 2009-12-09 07:05
- PGjA
- U
- AD
- Report
- 0
Please correct the TALK time: 12,5 hours
Please include DIGITAL COMPASS for GPS
Source: http://europe.nokia.com/find-p...ecifications
- Reply
- 2009-12-08 20:24
- ns09
- F
- mur
- Report
- 0
liked the design
liked the feature,of course The GPS
awesome
- Reply
- 2009-12-08 17:01
- Pxxd
- U
- Sherjeel
- Report
- 0
I am a big Nokia fan and I have used a lot of their devices including the old internet table. I find it really interesting that they are going to give a GPS feature in a low end phone. As competetion grows the quality and everything will improve as well. Why pay 30k or 40k for something when you can get it well under 15k. I am really happy with their decision and support them with each and everyone of their product.
- Reply
- 2009-12-08 12:51
- P%vN
- C
- Ramzy
- Report
- 0
> In reply to tgm91 @ 2009-12-07 15:00 from LaC2 - click to readTotally agree with u tm91, 1st thing for a navigation phone is big screen,second u could put a Flexible OS,with good processor, and with good battery,and lets not forget 3G...we are almost in 2010, and companies still deliver phones with no 3G, or with no bluetooth...
i mean is it still that expensive as a technology to implement?
i really cant understand!!
- Reply
- 2009-12-08 12:41
- mA@e
- R
- Frh
- Report
- 0
S40 sounds getting a little to far (or too short).
They could have got atleast S60 so that there could atleast be some multi tasking.
- Reply
- 2009-12-07 19:19
- PIdZ
- U


Login with
Facebook
Google
Sign up