Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
6.8
- Features
-
6.6
- Performance
-
6.8
- peruvian
- Report
my god, has the world gone mad. this phone is horrible: bad design. bad features, bad perfomance. if anyone wants a budget phone get a moto c650, it has slightly better specs for a cheap price
- Reply
- 2007-07-15 19:56
- Lyxm
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
this is a real beauty, but sad to see, it doesnt hav a card slot & so small memory & also no mp3. :( but still this is so lady...
- Reply
- 2007-05-20 07:17
- PxdH
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
the design of this phone is like 6101 but withouth the antenna. i like the design of 2505 much better (see mobile-review.com/fullnews/main/index_eng.shtml#13719 ). too bad it's in cdma and not gsm cell band. hope Nokia will come out with a gsm version og 2505.
- Reply
- 2007-05-07 16:16
- PZtr
- U
- gigi
- Report
nokia are good phones, but in comapre to other phones with same features nokia costs allmoust twice,and i don't thinck i am going to keep them twice as long as other phones
- Reply
- 2007-05-05 10:42
- mspt
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
Very similar to Z310, but for low end users, the looks matter a lot, and the Z310 looks better.
- Reply
- 2007-05-05 03:00
- U2Tx
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
What the f**k is wrong with you people. Don't you know that nokia has the best phones. What would you expect for a low end phone. If you think it's crap keep that to yourself and spend your money on a better phone.
- Reply
- 2007-05-04 20:58
- PvW1
- U
- zorba
- Report
ok i think some coments come from se fans
compare se low end and nokia
nokia is much better in low end
- Reply
- 2007-05-04 11:02
- n2Tj
- U
- luis
- Report
And one more thing. It will be cheaper than nokia 6101 when it was launched 2 years ago. And with more features. I think it`s a great deal
- Reply
- 2007-05-04 06:00
- P1Uc
- U
- Ricardo
- Report
The Nokia finally make a low end cell phone with a memory decent!
- Reply
- 2007-05-04 02:13
- Pfns
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.


RSS feed