Nokia 3109 classic - user opinions and reviews

Nokia

Popularity

Daily interest
0.1%
Total hits:
494164

Voting results

Design
7.5
Features
7.4
Performance
7.5
Votes:
711

Sort by:

POOOOOOR
nokia no camera
bad design
poor display
ALAS this is a sure disaster

  • Reply
  • 2007-06-06 22:37
  • PSdH
  • U

I think this phone will be a big hit among low-mid-high end segment.I will definitely get this phone if the price is right and the battery is long lasting.

NOTE: It could be the N6310i successor(who knows?)

  • Reply
  • 2007-06-03 13:13
  • wujH
  • U

The Deep, I totaly agree with you! I already have Nokia 6021 and I'm wating for this phone to release so I could get it.

  • Reply
  • 2007-06-01 21:30
  • miTi
  • U

This will definitely replace the Nokia 6021 for the B2B market. Nokia know there is a gap in the market as most corporates look for phones with bluetooth but no camera.

  • Reply
  • 2007-06-01 09:49
  • Tt{6
  • U

I want one! Its a must have phone.

  • Reply
  • 2007-06-01 09:02
  • ibdu
  • U

GUUUUYYYYYS why do you think all the phones MUST have the camera? There are tons of phones with camera! Don't you think there are some people out there who can't or don't want to have a phone with camera? Stop complaining for lack of camera on this phone.

  • Reply
  • 2007-05-31 10:19
  • miTi
  • U

............... no camera
what

jus a borin cell
from nokia

  • Reply
  • 2007-05-31 00:54
  • PFI}
  • U

good but no CAMERA!!!! everytime nokia do a lil mistake wit their phns

  • Reply
  • 2007-05-30 20:47
  • w9Lq
  • U

Simply Greattttt!!!!!!
Finally a cell with an mp3 player and other main features(gprs,edge,bluetooth etc.)without a camera is offered by a reputable company.Yes,a cell with mp3 player and extendable memory without any camera and thats exactly what I have been looking for a long time.Lack of FM is no big issue.Well done NOKIA but the price should be low as well.

  • Reply
  • 2007-05-27 23:27
  • Uq4P
  • U

Great phone, more phones with lots of advanced functions but WITHOUT camera is exactly what i'm looking for!! Throw in 3G and it would be a dreamphone.

The dimensions are stretching a bit though, 108.5 x 45.7 x 15.6mm is a bit to long and wide for my taste, 99x42x16mm would have been more appropriate for the pantspocket..

Length is the most important measurement when stuffing a phone in tight pockets, and width is the most important when it comes to resting the phone easy in your hand, to wide and you won't get a good grip, while thickness, as everyone seems to be so nuts about these days, is in my opinion the least important measurent on a phone?

I wish they would make more phones with the measurements of the wonderful Ericsson T66/T600.

  • Reply
  • 2007-05-27 11:49
  • muyd
  • U

This is what I've been waiting for! Stylish Nokia phone, NO USELESS CAMERA! Good features
such as MP3 player with high capacity memory.
I wish it had radio included. But fair enough! GOOD JOB NOKIA! Can anyone please let
me know how long usualy it'll take till nokia release a new phone after they announce it?? Thanks.

  • Reply
  • 2007-05-25 20:06
  • miTi
  • U

Great! Looks good and simple to me. Finally someone made a phone that stands near the Black Pearl phone.
Looking forward to read a review on this low-ender.

  • Reply
  • 2007-05-23 19:32
  • pj1D
  • U

the features of the phone is similar to Nokia N-gage

  • Reply
  • 2007-05-23 14:22
  • Rxck
  • U

Between 3110 and 3109, I'll definitely choose this one. Not everyone need radio and camera.

  • Reply
  • 2007-05-22 20:23
  • 2IGH
  • U

I think nokia is delibrately not giving much of the main features in one phone, thats bad.

  • Reply
  • 2007-05-22 14:44
  • PSdg
  • U

thank God at last nokia has got the point of giving lots of features and not adding useless, lower quality camera in there phone but i will be more happy to see a folding phone with no camera at all n many features at the same time.

  • Reply
  • 2007-05-22 14:39
  • PSdg
  • U

superb but something more with the screen, radio and battery

  • Reply
  • 2007-05-22 07:26
  • ijgi
  • U

I badly wanted a music phone with card slot but WITHOUT camera... and this one was going to be my perfect phone, but alas... Nokia forgot the Radio !!!

  • Reply
  • 2007-05-21 19:28
  • P$3e
  • U

it cud have been the perfect phone for those who don't want camera..but it's sooooo sad that it lacks radio...really bad thinking nokia...............

  • Reply
  • 2007-05-20 19:55
  • 2@eN
  • U

I don't understand nokia. I'm ok with that phone as budget model, but... What was the purpose to take the camera and radio out. I would understand this move, when battery life would significantly rise. What I see here is only 10 hours difference between this one and 3110. Heeelllloooo nokia, what are you doing??? There is no point in buying this one. Surely the price will be lower, but still who will buy that. Bye

  • Reply
  • 2007-05-19 21:57
  • msWW
  • U
Sort by:
Total of 167 user reviews and opinions for Nokia 3109 classic.