Sony Xperia S review: NXT of kin
Samsung Galaxy S II ICS review: Sugar coatedNokia 3109 classic - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.5
- Features
-
7.4
- Performance
-
7.5
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
I badly wanted a music phone with card slot but WITHOUT camera... and this one was going to be my perfect phone, but alas... Nokia forgot the Radio !!!
- Reply
- 2007-05-21 19:28
- P$3e
- U
- ?#@$
- Report
- 0
it cud have been the perfect phone for those who don't want camera..but it's sooooo sad that it lacks radio...really bad thinking nokia...............
- Reply
- 2007-05-20 19:55
- 2@eN
- U
- Maxx
- Report
- 0
I don't understand nokia. I'm ok with that phone as budget model, but... What was the purpose to take the camera and radio out. I would understand this move, when battery life would significantly rise. What I see here is only 10 hours difference between this one and 3110. Heeelllloooo nokia, what are you doing??? There is no point in buying this one. Surely the price will be lower, but still who will buy that. Bye
- Reply
- 2007-05-19 21:57
- msWW
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Oops, how come radio is removed? 3110 classic does have radio. Actually seems recently Nokia phones almost all have radio... I'm almost going to recommend this phone to my friend who works in a company that does not allow usage of camera phone (SE W200 has camera). But if this phone really has no radio then may not worth to recommend to him... :p
- Reply
- 2007-05-19 18:44
- TIEf
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
can somebody take the pain of replying to
my email add ,, about how much this phone
may cost and how much memory can it support,
and how s the sound quality compared to
nokia 3300.......
- Reply
- 2007-05-19 17:03
- Sa5m
- U
- 786
- Report
- 0
people, who needs a camera in a budget phone ??? the camera version is 3110 . i think this 1 is a Music phone to compete with SE W200
- Reply
- 2007-05-19 14:24
- mqjx
- U
