Apple iPhone 4S review: Fast 4ward
Motorola RAZR XT910 review: Through thick and thinNokia 3120 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.7
- Features
-
7.2
- Performance
-
7.6
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
the color is very crisp although its 4096 colors...looks better than SE T630...but lacks IR
- Reply
- 2004-10-17 06:16
- U
- Stephen
- Report
- 0
Nokia delivers yet another solid phone. Upgrade from 3595. Great ATTWS reception. Clear display (better than 3595). It is a SMALL phone; consequently, the keys would not 100% suit those with large fingers. Build quality is good, though 3595 I found to be absolutely indestructible (I'd be reluctant to drop the 3120 on concrete like I had accidentally done to the 3595 numerous times). Battery life is standard Nokia excellence but not as good as 3595 (alas, I'll only get 3+ hrs of talk time, not 5 or 6...darn!). If you're looking for a lightweight, inexpensive phone, go for the 3120. If you want a reliable, indestructible phone, 3595.
- Reply
- 2004-10-14 09:44
- U
- Pankaj
- Report
- 0
Hi it is very nice and officers look really it is talk of the town.
- Reply
- 2004-10-06 09:24
- U
- Thomas
- Report
- 0
hi there.. intented to get this phone.. can somebody pls enlighten whether is there a radio in this model 3120? to my info, i suppose there's none rite? and how good the camera really is?? thanks..
cheerss
- Reply
- 2004-10-05 12:33
- U
- Brandon
- Report
- 0
hey i was wondering is this phone better then the nokia 3595 or the 3100
- Reply
- 2004-10-04 04:12
- U
- Reece
- Report
- 0
I just bought this phone a couple of days ago. It's really cool. The design is professional looking. And what's even better is that it's not too expensive. I bought this to replace my SET230 where the screen accumulates layers of dust. This phone is really cool!
- Reply
- 2004-09-28 13:38
- U
- ruchi rastogi
- Report
- 0
hi! how r u? i have selected this phone for u. u buy it when u come here. see this page completely.
- Reply
- 2004-09-24 10:00
- U
- Funcky
- Report
- 0
Hi this is very nice handset esay to handle and it's like me so))) Qute Mobile
- Reply
- 2004-09-17 14:52
- U
- janessa
- Report
- 0
This is dumb... everyone is complaining about the phone not having a better quality screen or a camera... well some of us don't want to pay $600 for a better phone with better features because when it comes down to it, it's just a phone and the main reason i'll use it is just to call people
- Reply
- 2004-09-15 00:53
- U
- sunil
- Report
- 0
can any one tell me how to use the radio. can we forward ringtones using this thing n why does the pic message shrinks in size as u receive it compared to other cell phones
- Reply
- 2004-09-13 18:34
- U
- max see
- Report
- 0
this phone is basically a phone for ppl using it to make and receive calls...though not much great features..can't really complain much either since it is so cheap.....one last thing....the battery is extremely long lasting....thumbs up!
- Reply
- 2004-09-12 16:34
- U
- geoff
- Report
- 0
I couldnt believe how much people could whine about a cellphone. 4k instead of 64k colours = end of world? In another year you'll be saying that about the difference between 64k and 16M, or the non-ability to play Missy Elliot's entire back catalog as your ringtone.
I'll probably buy this one to replace my 5110 brick with the cracked faceplate... and I'll probably keep the default ringtone.
- Reply
- 2004-09-07 13:22
- U
- Andrew
- Report
- 0
I've had this phone since it was launched, and I can only say great thigs about it. Its very well built, has good reception, all the nice features you can expect from a Nokia, and on top of that is stylish + fun, not to mention the great display. I had to chose between the Mot. V300 and the S.Ericss 610...and I very glad I finally ended up chosing the Nokia 3120. I think is one of the best Tri-Bands in the market.
- Reply
- 2004-09-07 04:47
- U
