Nokia 3210 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.3
- Features
-
6.8
- Performance
-
7.2
- eko
- Report
it has ni-mg batteries. u need empty the battery before charging. its too bad. and short battery life!! i heard thet some of 3210 has li ion batteries. but without them 3210 is not a good phone.
- Reply
- 2001-03-16 12:24
- U
- The Chad
- Report
terrible phone, terrible TERRIBLE phone. feels very cheap, keys make all sorts of foily noises after a month or two. what is it with the single "main" button for nokia's entry phones? makes everything a hassle.
- Reply
- 2001-03-10 08:03
- U
- Matt
- Report
Get a 3310 if you can as it is a lot better than the 3210 and the signal is better.
- Reply
- 2001-01-25 06:47
- U
- Rob
- Report
Nice useable phone, the menus take a bit to get used to, and the signals not great, but excellent value...
- Reply
- 2000-12-14 02:55
- U
- jethro
- Report
yeah its not bad. However now everyones seems to have got one! Thats a bad thing if you want to look " the dogs b "
- Reply
- 2000-12-13 10:42
- U
- Cryo
- Report
Heh, the lack of an antenna is not as good as you may think... I've been on a trip with some friends, and the guy with the 3210 was loosing his signal all the time and couldn't make a call, while my banana (nokia 8110) was still having 3 out of 4 lines of signal.. Banana rules :)
A nice phone, none the less..
- Reply
- 2000-12-11 22:53
- U
- GaZ
- Report
Why didn't you add some additional features like Alarm with snooze option like you did in description of other phones?
- Reply
- 2000-11-16 05:50
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed