Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.1
- Features
-
6.9
- Performance
-
7.1
- Nilanka
- Report
- 0
Hi, I got this phone by a local seller in Colombo, Sri Lanka. At very first day something was gone wrong with the display. After that only a blue line was displayed in the screen. My problem is can this be happened? I didn't drop it even by my self.
Thanks
Nilanka(nrajapakse@virtusa.com)
- Reply
- 2003-11-04 16:50
- U
- thomas
- Report
- 0
The phone is good. More range than 5210 and cheaper. The lights are bright but the ringing tone is low. Plasctic body and ugly panels.
- Reply
- 2003-09-03 18:46
- U
- steph
- Report
- 0
hm....i like it so much!!!!!!!!! the functions also not bat!!!!!!!!!
- Reply
- 2003-08-08 20:39
- U
- judas
- Report
- 0
if u're using this phone, signal will be drop about 1-2 bar. I took a couple of test using N-8250 and Siemens S55.
- Reply
- 2003-07-08 14:33
- U
- Anwar hasan
- Report
- 0
How can we changr the Animated screensaver. Pls... give me the information.
- Reply
- 2003-06-29 23:46
- U
- Maricoiu Cristian
- Report
- 0
i want a 3610 because is very nice and is not so expensive!!!:)-
- Reply
- 2003-04-27 18:03
- U
- ling
- Report
- 0
dear nokia..today i was buy this 3610.is very lighter,very weight just like 8250.but it seem good condition.i like it very much.i almost u this nokia have oledy 3 years ago...by changging different model i use.if u all are saying nokia is lousy better don't buy it.think b4 action and buy for it.thanks!!!!
- Reply
- 2003-02-23 19:44
- U
- Slyders
- Report
- 0
I've just sell 3310 and buy this 3610 yesterday... U know what... today I trade in it with new 5210. I guess there's no big different between 3310 and 3610. I think it has a very stupid & ugly keypad style among the 3000 series. I prefer 5210 more than this stupid 3610. 3310 is better and money save , of coz !
- Reply
- 2003-01-26 14:44
- U
- Theresa Soh
- Report
- 0
Good phone, easy to use, reliable, value for money, small and handy.
- Reply
- 2003-01-08 21:20
- U

