At first I thought "Way to go, a no-nonsense phone made to last", almost ready to buy as soon as it came out.
BUT, after checking the lack of ONE only feature, I have decided this is no my next phone, and no, that feature is not a better camera or 3G, nor is it a 3.5mm audio jack, no, no, no, what was a deal-breaker for me was the fact that this is TRIBAND, if it is supposed to be an outdoor phone, why not make it QUADBAND so that it actually gets proper signal strenght in and outdoors, makes absolutely no sense, which is why I decided to pass on this phone, because nowadays no phone can get away without being QUADBAND.
Thanks Nokia, but no thanks... guess I rather stick to my old, battered, 3120 classic.
im wondering why new nokia fon become longer
5630 11.2cm and dis wan 11.5cm.
maybe its nokia trend for 2009
It's me again.
After my initial moan I am actually quite looking forward to this phone if it lives up to the camera standard of the recent Nokia 2 megapixel phone (e.g. 5130 expressmusic ) without autofocus.
But according to the official Nokia 3720 specs the cam does actually have autofocus.
how come no voice clarity in all models?
Does Nokia 3720 have a voice clarity?
good news..it will cost cheaper than b2100..better feature (2 mp camera resolution) n cheaper..
why nokia design all the models same round shaped they can give some other shape also all time same shape in maximum models 3rd class
Ok Guys, settle down, you must understand that all nokia phones are made for specific people. Phones that are relevant and useful in accordance to their Lifestyle. Ok??so the next time you even judge Nokia phones, make more research 'bout certain phones which fits you.. ok??like.. don't judge a phone when it's not even made for you... get it? ~Real talk:sueje
sorry this is insane ..like ?? below i have had 5140 5500 all of them and have been waiting for an upgrade on the 5500 for a LONG time now .. and yet while this has certain improvements to stay with a 2mp camera is insane .. the C702 is better than this .. nokia what are you doing!! all this time and now i have to get the sony .. do not people understand? IF you work outside you want 1) rain proof 2) rubber/drop proof 3) a decent phoning capability 4) a decent camera ( as otherwise you are carrying one too 5) internet connection .. everything else games/ music etc is fluff .. please is it THAT hard to put a decent camera in a rubber phone??????
are you high? have you even compared these phones? it has almost dubble the battery life, 2,5 plugg, microusb, a2dp and the list goes on, this is a cheep phone that nokia is releasing, you whant the best go with nokia n97 or n86 8mpix. this is a realy good cheep phone
Why does this only have a 2 megapixel camera and useless QCIF video? What the hell is going on Nokia?
Might as well keep my 5500 because as far as I can see it is actually BETTER on paper than this new rubbish phone.
I have been waiting years for a decent outdoor phone which takes good pictures and videos, and has the same features as the older 5140 (I.e thermometer, compass etc)
This phone will not sell because without a decent camera there is no reason to buy it above the 5140, 5140i, 5500 or even the 5210.
Very disappointed :(
is this fon abit like my old sport 55oo, had alot od probelms with the keys falling off, does anyone know if this keypad is rubber or plastic.
GT3, 10 Jul 2009compete with SE C702 but C702 is far more better than this nokia. no GPS..3.5G..etc that C702 had. I agree,, C702 was far more better in features,, Nokia,, do youre engeneers have a mind of their own?? youre just great in imitating other brands features,, not to mention desighn,,
GT3, 10 Jul 2009compete with SE C702 but C702 is far more better than this nokia. no GPS..3.5G..etc that C702 had. this handset is made to be durable, ultra resistant and long lasting.
dust water and shock resistant + 2G for better battery performance..and cheap!