Nokia 5700 - user opinions and reviews

Nokia

Pages: 12…319320 321 322323…331332

Only w810i has good camera in walkman series rest of all walkman are going from bad to worst and also can you let me no which symbian SE (w950i) is cheaper than nokia symbian music edition or which SE symbian (p990i/M600i) is cheaper than Nokia symbian(N73/N70) the reason is simple symbian require special hardware which increases cost of phone Nokia 5700 is cheaper and will be better than walkman (becoz 5300 has good music as good as w950i check gsmarena 5300 review on a standard headphones and also 5700 has separate audio chip) dont know about camera hope that this time Nokia has used better cam

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-04 14:00
  • M@T2
  • U

786 i havent got that phone no more I took it back, contracts and expensive phones are useless. I now have a 3310, the coolest phone on the planet

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-04 11:14
  • iIR0
  • U

Phone is quiet stylish, but lack in dual cam. Otherwise phone has nice features......its cost may effect market....Should be in an affordable range for max. people (less than 10000 bugs)

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-04 10:52
  • PGjW
  • U

nokia is failed to produce classic fancy musical fone reasons
1- the music edition of n series are no doubt attractive but there prices are v high as compare with sony ericson
2- camera is worse as compare with 2 mega pixel camera of sony ericson

dun waste ur money for musical edition of nokia ,

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-04 10:41
  • ijpk
  • U

Must I turn d camera so that the camera face me and I can do video caLLing? Sorry, because I don't see the secondary cam.

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-04 10:41
  • PFWZ
  • U

XCV.....its out already?...cool...its cheap!!!...good..

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-04 09:50
  • Fvkb
  • U

I was thinking of buying an imate but this thing made me change my mind!!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-04 06:27
  • PFIx
  • U

Official price in Thailand for 5700 is set at 13500Bt or ~290EUR.
it is unbelievably cheap!!

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-04 05:38
  • PxXI
  • U

cool phone dude!!!!!!!
but I really hope it's affordable.

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-04 04:25
  • PvW1
  • U

here's d official and SOLID proof that SE is way way way way way behind nokia!

mobile market share in 2006

http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=501734

(1) nokia = 34.8%
(2) motorola = 21.1%
(3) samsung = 11.8%
(4) sony ericsson = 7.4%
(5) lg = 6.3%

d higher d handset maker's rating means d better and higher quality it is, as u can see above, SE needs a MIRACLE and cybershot, walkman, megabass gimmicks r not enough to at least beat samsung, a PITY!

SE = 7.4% vs nokia = 34.8%! come on SE, u really need to learn lots from nokia! SE got those figures coz of previous released phones have 1) unreliable joysticks 2) also, keypads 3) soft loudspeaker volume (on most sets) 4) dropped calls 5) white screen of death 6) tiny screens 7) ancient video recording 176 x 144

millions of nokia users and buyers can't be wrong! their respective market shares speaks for themselves, SE got a low market share thru d past years, it only means that dey hav low quality phones! ciao =)

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-04 02:42
  • wu4Z
  • U

The nokia website says that the 5700 has got text-to-speech capabilities, just like the 5500 sport..nice :)

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-04 01:02
  • T0rn
  • U

All you SE fans what all you doing around here visiting Nokia 5700??Go see SE phones.Are you Full of ENVy becouse nokia is the best??This is a far better smartphone than every SE in the market.I had from SE the P990i,K800,W800,K750 and they are all junk.Every of them broked,On the P990i the camera was the worst i`ve seen in a mobile phone,the k800i crashed from the software in it,the w800 joystick fell out and the k750 buttons stopped working,so...I WILL NEVER GET A SonyEricsson again in my life.Even Samsung is better.Then again Nokia is the Best.

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-04 00:25
  • p3Gn
  • U

Nokia series 60 is soo slow...u could give birth in the time it takes to open a application.LOL

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-03 23:09
  • nERX
  • U

i have a nokia 5300 and trust me the picture quality is good but i got it the thursday and by friday afternoon the speakers blew but a part from that it good and i think the 5700 is smashing. gonna get 1

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-03 18:48
  • A5fK
  • U

SE(Sonyerricson) have Music

Samsung have slick phones

Nokia have Good Mobile Structure(good features)

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-03 18:11
  • nERX
  • U

This nokia phone is awesome,it has all the features the works!!!Great job NOKIA.

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-03 17:36
  • PvW1
  • U

sony walkman phone do not have symbian os lol no comparason nokia rocks

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-03 17:20
  • 4BcA
  • U

12 h mp3 play back

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-03 17:19
  • 4BcA
  • U

peace in the world , save the environnement , an a nokia symbian phone , and health , love and nokia symbian phone is all we need

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-03 17:18
  • 4BcA
  • U

oh, (majority of) hardcore, big time sony ericsson fanatics can't help but bash 5700 (i think they r jealous) and praise their beloved walkman phones [which for me, is juz a mktg gimmick of SE, i.e. walkman, cybershot, megabass whatever]

nwey, here's a reliable link to show u all how nokia and sony ericsson handsets r doing as well as motorola and samsung who had a higher market share than SE worldwide in 2006

http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=501734

d data in d given link, is a solid proof that good camera and music n a mobile phone is not d only basis for a great and excellent all around mobile phone nowadays. there are other considerations, of course! =)

mobile market share in 2006

(1) nokia = 34.8%
(2) motorola = 21.1%
(3) samsung = 11.8%
(4) sony ericsson = 7.4%
(5) lg = 6.3%

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-03 16:34
  • vpd9
  • U
Pages: 12…319320 321 322323…331332

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.