sony walkman phone do not have symbian os lol no comparason nokia rocks
peace in the world , save the environnement , an a nokia symbian phone , and health , love and nokia symbian phone is all we need
oh, (majority of) hardcore, big time sony ericsson fanatics can't help but bash 5700 (i think they r jealous) and praise their beloved walkman phones [which for me, is juz a mktg gimmick of SE, i.e. walkman, cybershot, megabass whatever]
nwey, here's a reliable link to show u all how nokia and sony ericsson handsets r doing as well as motorola and samsung who had a higher market share than SE worldwide in 2006
d data in d given link, is a solid proof that good camera and music n a mobile phone is not d only basis for a great and excellent all around mobile phone nowadays. there are other considerations, of course! =)
mobile market share in 2006
(1) nokia = 34.8%
(2) motorola = 21.1%
(3) samsung = 11.8%
(4) sony ericsson = 7.4%
(5) lg = 6.3%
peace in the world , save the environnement , and a nokia symbian phone is all i want
the central joystick will last trust me. but my serious problem with 3250 is that after 3 months the phone, out of the suddon, didn't recognised my memory card any more. it wasn't a software issue cause i reinstaled it it was a harware problem. P S it is till in service after 1 and 1/2 weeks.
well, here's wat i can say about battery life of both nokia and sony ericssons. as wat my experiences tells me, SE's batteries and stated official talk time NEVER been accurate or even come close. an example of which is k750, official talk time is 9 hours but in reality, it can only last up to 4 hours and 10 mins continuous talk time (call) on a fully charged battery [note dat i bought my k750 straight from a SE shop/store so there's no excuse of having a fake battery]. contrary with nokia, i had 6230i and official talk time is 3-5 hrs, in reality its about 4 hrs 5 mins, another one is 6630, official talk time is 3-6 hrs, in real life, it can last up to 3 hrs 45 mins (GSM not in dual mode) both on a fully charged batteries respectively. as stated, 5700 has a 3.5 hrs talktime but must never b d basis how long 5700 wil b able to play music in loudspeaker and/or when an earphone is plugged. at least, nokia is being more realistic and true than other brands.. =) peace out!
what i said was i have a W850i the battery lasted without Charging for 6 Days and that was without Charging it lasted from Saturday to Thursday without charging and i listened to the Walkman everyday of that 6 days it Neer died never said the bettery was low soo Sony have a good reputation for long batterys Nokias to me batterys drian very quick but if this 5700 has the same battery as the W850i il buy 5700 becuase i prefer Nokia to SE
I am not saying that SE has poor battery i am just saying that it will not last for 12 hours contineous music through speakers if you are using external portable stereo speakers than case is different as external speakers uses saparate battery then it may last for 12 to 16 hours sorry (moe) if you dont like my words although Nokia 5700 will definately have good music than walkman phones this phone have music playing time of about 10/11 hours which is quite good
Not a SE fan always crashes (yes it might just be mine) rubbish battery braaap! is totally right the battery lasts an hour max when playing music full volume out loud switching to nokia from my w850i is the best decision i ever made. This phone is phat! It has everything and much more than Walkmans! cmon a audio chip even the walkmans dont ave that and theyre music phones hahaha!
This phone is radddddddddddd!. just hope that it doesn't have a jaked up price.
i think the 5700 is showing to much of 3250 and 5300.any way it is a nokia!
and im say'n again wot u r tellin is not rite , u mite have a faulty one or battery .
I aint saying ur lying but what sort of a preson has their phone on loudspeaker when they are at work? where do you work for godsake!? lol Anyone, weather a SE fan or not will know that the phone will last about 2 hours max when the music is out loud thru the loudsoeaker :)
From the pictures, it looks pretty sweet. So it doesn't have that sleek look, but I like the whole sporty attitude it projects. The specifications it lists sounds very impressive.. but then again, I'm not that hard to please. The whole twisting concept to me sounds like something that could amuse for days. >>;; The color scheme isn't all that bad either, it's.. unique.
Anyways, I think comparing and judging the so-called 'performance' of the phone when it isn't even out is just plain stupid.
P.S. People have their different tastes. If you like Nokia, then go ahead. If you like SE, then go ahead as well. Just don't start being an ass and force your stupid opinions on people. -.-
to ED ..
well ED i do have w850i and i didnt lie , simply coz i dont have to lie bout it .. i dont use ma fone dat much , i mean for calls , i work alla day and i mite get 3 or 4 calls dats all per ma shift and ma music is on most of the time thru the loudspeaker , so i dont mass it but i do listen that much hours and the battery goes on for the next day .. and if i went [flight mode] it will give me more .. so please dont call me liar and get sure before u thro such a word .. Peace .
to braap ..
well yes i agree that nokia is givin me a better feature's with smart new OS [which is a plus] for almost the same price , i cant denied that SE is always pricy but as i told you @ the end of the day i got good music and battery as well with less crashin or laggin [S60] .. dats it and as i said before im not tellin that any is bad its juz ppl prefer's im a music man i prefer SE over nokia ma bro is more into applications and so he prefer Nokia S60 or UIQ , dats all .. but im consider'n 5700 coz it sounds Good with the whole package and Good price :D
hey the se weenies are infesting the nokia forum so i guess its time to plant our flag in a new horizon...... if ya know what i mean so.......let nokia rule........se are s*it n its a truth............